1. Response shift in coronary artery disease.
- Author
-
Lawal, Oluwaseyi A., Awosoga, Oluwagbohunmi A., Santana, Maria J., Ayilara, Olawale F., Wang, Meng, Graham, Michelle M., Norris, Colleen M., Wilton, Stephen B., James, Matthew T., and Sajobi, Tolulope T.
- Subjects
- *
CORONARY artery disease , *CORONARY artery bypass , *CORONARY disease , *CONFIRMATORY factor analysis , *PERCUTANEOUS coronary intervention - Abstract
Purpose: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) experience significant angina symptoms and lifestyle changes. Revascularization procedures can result in better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) than optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. This study evaluates the impact of response shift (RS) on changes in PROs of patients with CAD across treatment strategies. Methods: Data were from patients with CAD in the Alberta Provincial Project on Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry who completed the 16-item Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at 2 weeks and 1 year following a coronary angiogram. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was used to assess measurement invariance across treatment groups at week 2. Longitudinal MG-CFA was used to test for RS according to receipt of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. Results: Of the 3116 patients included in the analysis, 443 (14.2%) received CABG, 2049(65.8%) PCI, and the remainder OMT alone. The MG-CFA revealed a partial-strong invariance across the treatment groups at 2 weeks (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.05 [0.03, 0.06]). Recalibration RS was detected on the Angina Symptoms and Burden subscale and its magnitude in the OMT, PCI, and CABG groups were 0.32, 0.28, and 0.53, respectively. After adjusting for RS effects, the estimated target changes were largest in the CABG group and negligible in the OMT group. Conclusion: Adjusting for RS is recommended in studies that use SAQ-CAN to assess changes in patients with CAD who have received revascularization versus OMT alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF