Search

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for distal clavicle resection.Methods: A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified relevant publications in the English and German literature between 1997 and 2017. All included studies were levels I-IV, describing both treatments, with a minimum of 12 month follow-up, had at least one validated outcome score and documented patient recruitment, study design, demographic details, and surgical technique. Studies were excluded if they were only abstracts or conference proceedings, involved revision procedures, or the loss to follow-up exceeded 20%. Publication bias and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tools, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.Results: Four studies (n = 319 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. The pooled estimate for clinical outcomes (Constant, ASES) demonstrated no significant differences (SMD 0.323, I2 = 0%, p = 0.065) between open and arthroscopic resection, although the analysis favored open resection. The pooled estimate for clinical outcomes (SST) also demonstrated no significant differences (SMD 0.744, I2 = 49.82%, p = 0.144) between open and arthroscopic resection, but the analysis again favored open resection. The pooled estimate for VAS assessment of pain demonstrated no differences (SMD 0.217, I2 = 58.96%; p = 0.404) between open and arthroscopic resection.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that similar functional and clinical outcomes can be achieved with either open or arthroscopic distal clavicle resection. The observed trend that open resection may have a more favorable outcome warrants further investigation.Level Of Evidence: Level 3; systematic review and meta-analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study is to audit the clinical and functional outcomes of arthroscopic ganglionectomy (AG) in our centre. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all 29 patients who underwent AG from 2007 to 2012 with a mean clinic and telephone follow-up duration of 6 months and 32 months respectively. Results: A total of 29 patients (17 women and 12 men) with a mean age of 38 years underwent AG. 15 patients (52%) had associated pain with the lump, 24 out of 29 patients (83%) had preoperative ultrasound to confirm the diagnosis. All patients had preoperative wrist radiographs that showed no chronic carpal instability and bony pathology. 26 out of 29 patients (90%) had dorsal wrist ganglions and 3 patients (10%) had volar wrist ganglions. 15 out of 24 ganglions (62.5%) were multiloculated. Mean ganglion size clinically and through wrist ultrasound was 2.5 cm and 1.8 cm respectively. During arthroscopy, ganglion stalk was identified in 14 patients (48%). Average operating time was 69.5 minutes. Intraoperatively, 24 out of 29 patients (83%) had wrist synovitis and 26 patients (90%) had associated carpal ligament laxity. 97% of cases were successfully resected arthroscopically. Recurrence rate was 10% (3 cases). There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative range of motion of wrists - the mean wrist flexion ranged from 63 to 59 degrees pre and postoperatively, and the mean wrist extension ranged from 66 to 64 degrees pre and postoperatively. Overall grip strength improved from 27 kg to 32 kg (), and there was also a significant improvement in pain scores pre and post-operatively from visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 0.8 to 0.3 (). No major intra or post-operative complications occurred. All patients were satisfied in terms of cosmesis. Conclusions: AG is a safe and reliable alternative to open resection of wrist ganglions. In addition, it can be used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for other wrist conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Shoulder pain in general and acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain specifically is common after acceleration‑deceleration injury following road traffic accident (RTA). The outcome of surgical treatment in this condition is not described in the literature. The aim of the present study was to report the outcome of arthroscopic resection of the ACJ in these cases. Materials and Methods: Nine patients with localized ACJ pain, resistant to nonoperative treatment were referred on an average 18 months after the injury. There were 3 male and 6 females. The right shoulder was involved in seven patients and the left in two. The average age was 38.9 years (range 29‑46 years). All presented with normal X‑rays but with torn acromioclavicular joint disc and effusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Arthroscopic ACJ excision arthroplasty was performed in all patients. Results: At a mean followup of 18 month, all patients had marked improvement. The Constant score improved from 36 to 81, the pain score from 3/15 to 10/15 and the patient satisfaction improved from 3.5/10 to 9.3/10. Conclusion: Arthroscopic ACJ excision arthroplasty, gives good outcomes in patients not responding to conservative management in ACJ acceleration‑deceleration injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Calcaneonavicular coalition represents abnormal coalescence between calcaneus and navicular bone. It is a congenital anomaly, sometimes becoming symptomatic in young adolescent. This is managed conservatively initially, failing which surgical excision, open or arthroscopic, is considered. We present our arthroscopic technique via a modified sinus tarsi approach, with early results in two adolescent and two young adult patients. Method: The patient is placed in a 45° “saggy” lateral position, and entry points for portals are marked around sinus tarsi area. The adequacy of resection is checked with image intensifier at the end of procedure. Patients complete subjective scoring forms, Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scale, pre operatively and at follow-ups. Paired t test was performed to assess statistical significance. Results: The results of early follow-up of these patients have confirmed complete excision, non-recurrence and symptomatic improvement. The mean difference in MOXFQ scores pre and post surgery is 39.33, with a two-tailed p value of 0.0187. Similarly, the mean difference in VAS score is 5.67 with a two-tailed p value of 0.0034. These are statistically significant and confirm symptomatic improvement at an early follow-up. Conclusion: The arthroscopic technique provides better access allowing wide excision and causes minimal soft tissue trauma leading to early recovery and mobilisation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The discoid meniscus is a common meniscal anomaly. Symptomatic discoid menisci treated by arthroscopic surgery were examined preoperatively and postoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aim of this study was to quantify the amount of meniscal resection when treating discoid meniscus in children by partial meniscectomy. The hypothesis was that partial meniscectomy left sufficient amounts of meniscal tissue. Methods: A quantitative evaluation of meniscal size comparing preoperative and postoperative data after partial meniscectomy was performed by MRI ( n = 6). The anteroposterior meniscal diameter and anterior and posterior thickness were measured. The relative postoperative thickness to preoperative thickness was defined. All patients were graded according to Lysholm score and Ikeuchi knee scale. Results: The quantitative MRI evaluation showed a pronounced reduction of the anteroposterior meniscal diameter (42%) and anterior thickness (41%) after partial meniscectomy, whereas the posterior thickness showed a mean increase of 50%. According to Ikeuchi, all clinical postoperative findings were excellent and displayed an increase in Lysholm score. Conclusions: MRI findings showed that the amount of remaining tissue after partial meniscectomy was smaller than aspired. Especially in the anterior joint, the final size of remaining meniscal tissue was overestimated intraoperatively. It may be concluded that in arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, the final meniscal size, especially in the anterior part of the joint, is difficult to assess. As it is known that the extent of meniscal resection plays a crucial role in the clinical course of discoid menisci, these data claim retentiveness in resecting meniscal tissue. Level of evidence: Therapeutic case series, Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our aim was to compare two methods of treatment of ganglia on the volar aspect of the wrist (the open excision done through a longitudinal volar skin incision and the arthroscopic resection through two or three dorsal ports), to see if arthroscopy could reduce the risks of operating in this area and the time to healing. Twenty radiocarpal and five midcarpal volar ganglia were operated on by open approach and an equivalent group was treated by arthroscopy. Fifteen radiocarpal and five midcarpal ganglia were treated with good results in the open group and 18 radiocarpal and one midcarpal ganglia in the arthroscopic group (no visible or palpable ganglion, a full range of active wrist movement, grip strength equal to preoperatively, no pain, and a cosmetically acceptable scar). In the open group there were four injuries to a branch of the radial artery, two cases of partial stiffness of the wrist associated with a painful scar, one case of neuropraxia, and one recurrence (all of which were among the 20 radiocarpal ganglia). In the arthroscopic group there was one case of neuropraxia, one injury to a branch of the radial artery, and three recurrences (three of the complications were among the five midcarpal ganglia). The mean functional recovery time was equal to 15 (6) days in the open group and 6 (2) days in the arthroscopic group. The mean time lost from work was equal to 23 (11) days in the open group and 10 (5) days in the arthroscopic group. Our results suggest that arthroscopic resection is a reasonable alternative to open excision in treating radiocarpal volar ganglia because it has less postoperative morbidity and a better cosmetic result. Midcarpal volar ganglia, however, should still be treated by open operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]