1. Why Are There So Many Waterfowl and So Few Northern Bobwhites? Rethinking Federal Coordination.
- Author
-
Williams, Christopher K., Applegate, Roger D., and Coppola, Philip M.
- Subjects
- *
NORTHERN bobwhite , *WATERFOWL , *MIGRATORY animals , *GAME & game-birds , *MIGRATORY birds ,MIGRATORY Bird Treaty Act (U.S. : 1918) - Abstract
In this paper we ask whether we should we re‐examine the future of upland gamebird management and greater federal oversight and partnerships in the twenty‐first century. Management for waterfowl in North America has been successful because of the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the subsequent 1986 North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP). Although the MBTA included most migratory and non‐migratory species, upland gamebirds, including the northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; bobwhite), were excluded and retained under state control. Although many waterfowl populations have been increasing, bobwhite populations have declined precipitously during much of the period. Excluding non‐migratory gamebirds from the MBTA meant that the multistate coordinating efforts that made the MBTA successful for increasing the management of waterfowl have not been applied. The National Bobwhite Conservation Initiative (NBCI) has made a strong effort to unite states within the bobwhite range but does not have the federal anchoring and financial support that were given to states by the MBTA and NAWMP and currently integrate adaptive harvest, habitat management, and financial partnerships to acquire and manage wetlands that support waterfowl production. The NBCI Coordinated Implementation Program (CIP) is designed to serve the function of developing and monitoring habitat for bobwhites but is entirely voluntary and dependent entirely on state and non‐governmental organization (NGO) funds, lacking federal grants and Federal Duck Stamp funds. To catch up with the successes of waterfowl, we discuss the implications of increasing coordination, partnerships, and funding mechanisms between the federal government, state governments, and NGOs to provide common landscape‐level population monitoring and modeling, adaptive harvest regulations, habitat management goals, and a national upland gamebird stamp. © 2021 The Wildlife Society. : This paper explores whether upland gamebirds should have increased federal coordination, like migratory gamebirds, to assure better conservation in the twenty‐first century. The authors discuss the implications of increasing coordination, partnerships, and funding mechanisms between the federal government, state governments, and non‐governmental organizations to provide common landscape‐level population monitoring and modeling, adaptive harvest regulations, habitat management goals, and a national upland gamebird stamp. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF