Search

Implementation science is the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices in routine care, with the goal of improving the quality and effectiveness of health services (Bauer et al., 2015). In addition to this common goal, practice-oriented psychotherapy research (and researchers) and implementation science (and scientists) share a common focus on the people and the places where treatment happens. Thus, there exists strong potential for combining these two approaches. In this article, we provide a primer on implementation science for psychotherapy researchers and highlight important areas and examples of convergence and complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research. Specifically, we (a) define and describe the core features of implementation science; (b) discuss similarities and areas of complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research; (c) discuss a case example that exemplifies the integration of implementation science and practice-oriented research; and (d) propose directions for future research and collaborations that leverage both implementation science and practice-oriented research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In response to COVID-19, continued workforce training is essential to ensure that evidence-based treatments are available on the frontline to meet communities' ongoing and emerging mental health needs. However, training during a pandemic imposes many new challenges. This paper describes a multisite training and implementation pilot program, facets of which allowed for continued training despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social distancing guidelines. This virtual facilitated learning collaborative in Written Exposure Therapy, an evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, included virtual workshop training, phone-based clinical consultation, implementation-focused video calls for program leadership, and program evaluation. Data are presented about program enrollees and patient impact following the onset of COVID-19-related social distancing restrictions. Challenges, successes, and practical guidance are discussed to inform the field regarding training strategies likely to be durable in an uncertain, dynamic healthcare landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. IBS is a risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI), the unintentional passage of solid or liquid stool. FI can substantially interfere with health related quality of life (HRQL), leading to heightened anxiety and avoidance behavior. Nevertheless, relatively little research has been conducted on the prevalence of FI in IBS patients. This study evaluated the prevalence of FI in people with self-reported IBS and the relationship between FI and HRQL. 703 people who reported a diagnosis of IBS completed questionnaires on IBS symptom severity, FI symptom severity, HRQL, fear of food, anxiety about visceral sensations, and GI specific catastrophizing. Overall, 60% of people with IBS reported experiencing at least one lifetime episode of FI. In a subsample of 360 people who met strict Rome IV criteria and reported no other GI related co-morbidities, 62% reported experiencing at least one lifetime episode. While people who experienced FI more frequently had worse HRQL statistically, the differences in HRQL between people who had experienced FI and those who had not were not clinically significant. Rather than frequency of FI or physical symptom severity, quality of life was mostly determined by psychological variables, such as fear of food, anxiety, and catastrophizing. This study suggests that FI is quite prevalent in IBS patients, but that the best way to improve HRQL for IBS patients with FI may be to focus on reducing anxiety, catastrophizing and avoidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]