Search

The Bogota company El Áncora Editores was founded by Patricia Hoher and Felipe Escobar in 1980 and is still in operation. The purpose of this text is to present an approach to the history of El Áncora publishing house, analyze its editorial line based on study of the reconstructed catalog and show how the company was inserted into the publishing market of the last decades of the twentieth century and throughout the 21st century; all of this having as a theoretical-methodological framework the sociology of literature and the publishing studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Minimally invasive surgery using a mini-open lateral retropleural or retroperitoneal approach for corpectomy is a well-described procedure for treating unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Most surgeons have incorporated fluoroscopy for localization and determination of hardware placement accuracy; however, the utility of computer-assisted image-guided spinal navigation has not been well described. We report a series of mini-open lateral approach thoracolumbar corpectomy cases using either fluoroscopy or intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) with computer-assisted navigation and discuss the technical nuances and advantages of using iCT with navigation versus fluoroscopy. Methods A retrospective review and analysis was performed of the cases of 20 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures surgically managed via mini-open lateral corpectomy with fluoroscopy (2013–2015) or iCT navigation (2015–2017). The surgical outcomes were evaluated by the estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and need for revision. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the numerical rating scale pain score. Radiographic outcomes were assessed with follow-up CT scans. The results were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Results The mean follow-up period was 13.4 months for the fluoroscopy group and 14.7 months for the iCT group. No surgical complications developed and no revisions were required. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in surgical or clinical outcomes. However, the radiation exposure to the surgeons was significantly less with the iCT group (P < 0.003). Conclusions The use of iCT with spinal navigation for mini-open lateral corpectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures yields perioperative and clinical outcomes comparable to those using traditional fluoroscopy, with decreased radiation exposure to surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Pedicle screw placement remains challenging. The present study focuses on the comparison between 2 intraoperative-based neuronavigation systems (O-Arm and AIRO) during thoracolumbar screw instrumentation. Methods This is a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study conducted in 2 French academic centers. The O-Arm was used at the University Hospital of Bordeaux, whereas the AIRO was used at the University Hospital of Marseille. Routine computed tomography was performed on postoperative day 2 to evaluate pedicle screw placement. Measures of radiation exposure were extracted directly from reports provided by each system. The effective dose was calculated. Results Overall, 74 screws were placed in 11 patients in the O-Arm group and 84 in 11 patients in the AIRO group. In the first group, 90.8% were rated as acceptable and 92.2% in the second (P > 0.05) according to the Heary and Gertzbein classifications, respectively, for thoracic and lumbar spine. Differences between both implantation systems were significant (P < 0.05) concerning dose length product (235 and 1039 mGy/cm, in O-Arm and AIRO, respectively), overall mean radiation dose received by 1 patient (3.52 and 15.6 mSv in O-Arm and AIRO, respectively), mean radiation dose per single scan (2.58 and 8.7 mSv in O-Arm and AIRO, respectively), mean effective dose per instrumented level (1.04 and 3.9 mSv in O-Arm and AIRO, respectively), and radiation dose received by the primary surgeon (0.63 and 0 μSv in O-Arm and AIRO, respectively). Conclusions Intraoperative computed tomography–based navigation is a major innovation that improves the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning with acceptable patient radiation exposure and reduced surgical team exposure. Highlights • A comparison between 2 iCT-based neuronavigation systems, O-Arm and AIRO, is proposed. • iCT-based navigation is a major innovation that improves patient safety regarding pedicle screw positioning. • Acceptable patient radiation exposure and reduced surgical team exposure is noted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Current solutions for navigated spine surgery remain hampered by restrictions in surgical workflow as well as a limited versatility and applicability. Against this background, we report the first experience of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO(®) intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) scanner.Methods: AIRO(®) iCT was used for navigated posterior spinal instrumentation of 170 screws in 23 consecutive patients operated on in our Department between the first use of the system in May 2014 and August 2014. The indications for AIRO(®) were based on the surgical region, anatomical complexity and the need for >3 segment instrumentation. Following navigated screw insertion, screw positions were confirmed intraoperatively by a second iCT scan. CT data on screw placement accuracy were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed by an independent observer.Results: AIRO(®)-based spinal navigation was easy to implement and successfully accomplished in all patients, adding around 18-34 min to the net surgery time. A systematic description of the authors' approach, setup in the OR and workflow integration of the AIRO(®) is presented. Analysis of screw placement accuracy revealed 9 (5.3%) screws with minor pedicle breaches (<2 mm). A total of 7 screws (4.1%) were misplaced >2 mm, resulting in an accuracy rate of 95.9%.Conclusions: The AIRO(®) system is an easy-to-use and versatile iCT for navigated spinal instrumentation and provides high pedicle screw accuracy rates. Although the authors' experience suggests that the learning curve associated with AIRO(®)-based spinal navigation is steep, a systematic user-based approach to the technology is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation dose and image quality from a recently introduced mobile CT imaging system are presented. Radiation dose was measured using a conventional 100 mm pencil ionization chamber and CT polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) body and head phantoms. Image quality was evaluated with a CATPHAN 500 phantom. Spatial resolution, low contrast resolution, Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and Normalized Noise Power Spectrum (NNPS) were analyzed. Radiation dose and image quality were compared to those from a multi-detector CT scanner (Siemens Sensation 64). Under identical technique factors radiation dose (mGy/mAs) from the AIRO mobile CT system (AIRO) is higher than that from a 64 slice CT scanner. Based on MTF analysis, both Soft and Standard filters of the AIRO system lost resolution quickly compared to the Sensation 64 slice CT. The Siemens scanner had up to 7 lp/cm for the head FOV and H40 kernel and up to 5 lp/cm at body FOV for the B40f kernel. The Standard kernel in the AIRO system was evaluated to have 3 lp/cm and 4 lp/cm for the body and head FOVs respectively. NNPS of the AIRO shows low frequency noise due to ring-like artifacts which may be caused by detector calibration or lack of artifact reducing image post-processing. Due to a higher dose in terms of mGy/mAs at both head and body FOV, the contrast to noise ratio is higher in the AIRO system than in the Siemens scanner. However detectability of the low contrast objects is poorer in the AIRO due to the presence of ring artifacts in the location of the targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]