Search

The objective was to assess the global oral lichen planus prevalence. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published before September 2019. We evaluated the quality of studies and carried out several meta‐analyses. The global pooled prevalence was 1.01%, with a marked geographical difference (p <.001). The highest prevalence was reported from Europe (1.43%) and the lowest in India (0.49%), where tobacco‐associated keratosis appears to mask oral lichen planus resulting in attenuation of its prevalence. From the age of 40 years, the prevalence increases significantly and progressively (OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 2.48–4.73, p <.001). Studies that define diagnostic criteria report a higher prevalence (1.31% vs. 0.70%, p =.03), although the application of the WHO criteria (year 1978‐2007) does not increase the ability to diagnose the disease compared with other criteria (p =.11). The studies performed by oral medicine/oral pathology specialists report significantly higher prevalence (1.80%) than dentists (0.61%) and dermatologists (0.33%; p <.001). In conclusion, we propose that reliable diagnostic criteria should be defined, which should include a set of essential criteria including the presence of white reticular lesions in any location of the oral mucosa. The impact of histopathological confirmation with defined diagnostic criteria must be researched in the future, although its main use should be to determine the presence or absence of epithelial dysplasia. The necessity to improve the knowledge of oral lichen planus among dentists and dermatologists through continuing education is apparent in the results of this meta‐analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate current evidence in relation to the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of oral squamous cell carcinomas arising in patients with oral lichen planus (OLP-OSCC).Material and Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus for studies published before May-2019. We evaluated the quality of studies (QUIPS tool). We carried out meta-analyses to fulfill our objective. We examined the between-study heterogeneity and small-study effects, and conducted sensitivity and subgroup analyses.Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 27 studies (10,505 patients with OLP, of whom 205 developed a total of 247 OSCCs). The combined 5-year mortality rate was 15.48% for OLP-OSCC (95%CI  =  7.34-25.19), clearly lower than the 34.70-50.00% mortality rate for conventional oral cancer communicated in previous official reports. Also, 14.67% (95%CI  =  6.34-24.81) of OLP-OSCC developed N+ status, compared to 47.00% of conventional oral carcinomas. Likewise, most of the OSCCs in the study were T1/T2 (93.57%, 95%CI  =  82.20-99.88) and presented at stage I/II (81.51%, 95%CI = 68.32-92.38) at the time of diagnosis, which contrasts with 50.00% of conventional carcinomas diagnosed in stages I/II. Furthermore, most of the cases were grade I (well differentiated OSCC) (67.79%; 95%CI = 43.50-88.65), in comparison to conventional OSCCs, which present typically in grade II in 90.00% of cases. Our results also show an 11.21% of the OLP-OSCC patients in this study developed multiple tumors.Conclusions: Oral squamous cell carcinomas that developed in oral lichen planus show favorable prognostic parameters, especially with regard to the mortality rate. Around 11% of OLP-OSCC patients develop multiple tumors, which confirms that OLP can lead to field cancerization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]