Search

Metastatic testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are a potentially curable disease by administration of risk-adapted cytotoxic chemotherapy. Nevertheless, a disease-relapse after curative chemotherapy needs more intensive salvage chemotherapy and significantly worsens the prognosis of TGCT patients. Circulating tumor markers (β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG), alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP), and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)) are frequently used for monitoring disease recurrence in TGCT patients, though they lack diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Increasing evidence suggests that serum levels of stem cell-associated microRNAs (miR-371a-3p and miR-302/367 cluster) are outperforming the traditional tumor markers in terms of sensitivity to detect newly diagnosed TGCT patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these miRNAs are also informative in detection of disease recurrence in TGCT patients after curative first line therapy. For this purpose, we measured the serum levels of miR-371a-3p and miR-367 in 52 samples of ten TGCT patients at different time points during disease relapse and during salvage chemotherapy. In our study, miR-371a-3p levels in serum samples with proven disease recurrence were 13.65 fold higher than levels from the same patients without evidence of disease (p = 0.014). In contrast, miR-367 levels were not different in these patient groups (p = 0.985). In conclusion, miR-371a-3p is a sensitive and potentially novel biomarker for detecting disease relapse in TGCT patients. This promising biomarker should be investigated in further large prospective trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed a propensity score analysis on the role of metastasectomy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Our results support the concept that metastasectomy is associated with improved overall survival in this population. This benefit appears to be confined to metastasectomies that achieve complete resection of all known lesions. Introduction: To quantify the magnitude of benefit of metastasectomy as compared to medical treatment alone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and Methods: We therefore conducted a propensity score analysis of overall survival (OS) in 106 mRCC patients with metachronous metastasis, of whom 36 (34%) were treated with metastasectomy, and 70 (66%) with medical therapy alone. Results: The most frequent metastasectomy procedures were lung resections (n = 13) and craniotomies (n = 6). Median time-to-progression after metastasectomy was 0.7 years (25th-75th percentile: 0.3-2.7). After a median follow-up of 6.2 years and 63 deaths, 5-year OS estimates were 41% and 22% in the metastasectomy and medical therapy group, respectively (log-rank P = .00007; Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.21-0.68). Patients undergoing metastasectomy had a significantly higher prevalence of favorable prognostic factors, such as fewer bilateral lung metastases and longer disease-free intervals between nephrectomy and metastasis diagnosis. After propensity score weighting for these differences and adjusting for immortal time bias, the favorable association between metastasectomy and OS became much weaker (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-1.00, P = .050). Propensity-score-weighted 5-year OS estimates were 24% and 20% in the metastasectomy and medical therapy group, respectively (log-rank P = .001). In exploratory analyses, the benefit of metastasectomy was confined to patients who achieved complete resection of all known metastases. Conclusion: Within the limitations of an observational study, these findings support the concept of metastasectomy being associated with an OS benefit in mRCC patients. Metastasectomies not achieving complete resection of all known lesions are likely without OS benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefit of alpelisib in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer patients provided clinical evidence for the increasing importance of PIK3CA testing. We performed a comparison of liquid biopsy and tissue-based detection of PIK3CA mutations.Materials and Methods: PIK3CA hotspot mutation analysis using a high-resolution SiMSen-Seq assay was performed in plasma from 93/99 eligible patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Additionally, mFAST-SeqS was used to estimate the tumour fractions in plasma samples. In 72/93 patients, matched tissue was available and analysed using a customised Ion Torrent panel.Results: PIK3CA mutations were detected in 48.6% of tissue samples and 47.3% of plasma samples, with identical PIK3CA mutation detected in 24/72 (33.3%) patients both in tissue and plasma. In 10 (13.9%) patients, mutations were only found in plasma, and in 6 (8.3%) patients, PIK3CA mutations found in tissue were not detectable in ctDNA. In 49/93 plasma samples without detectable PIK3CA mutations, 22 (44.9%) samples had elevated tumour fractions, implying true negative results.Conclusion: SiMSen-Seq-based detection of PIK3CA mutations in plasma shows advantageous concordance with the tissue analyses. A combination with an untargeted approach for detecting ctDNA fractions may confirm a negative PIK3CA result and enhance the performance of the SiMSen-Seq test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]