1. Investigating the perceptions and experiences of Canadian dentists on dental regulatory bodies' communications and guidelines during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
- Author
-
McLaughlin, Kendra Jennie, Khanna, Mehak, Allison, Paul J., Glogauer, Michael, McNally, Mary E., Quiñonez, Carlos, Rock, Leigha, Siqueira, Walter, and Madathil, Sreenath A.
- Subjects
- *
WORK , *CANADIANS , *MEDICAL protocols , *QUALITATIVE research , *RESEARCH funding , *DENTAL associations , *CONTENT analysis , *HEALTH , *INFORMATION resources , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *LONGITUDINAL method , *FRUSTRATION , *COMMUNICATION , *COGNITION disorders , *COUNSELING , *DENTISTS' attitudes , *EXPERIENTIAL learning , *COVID-19 , *RULES , *COVID-19 pandemic - Abstract
Objective: Dental regulatory bodies aim to ensure the health and safety of dentists, dental staff patients and the public. An important responsibility during a pandemic is to communicate risk and guidelines for patient care. Limited data exist on the perceptions and experiences of dentists navigating new guidelines for mitigating risk in dental care during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to use a qualitative approach to explore how dentists in Canada experienced and perceived their regulatory bodies' communication about COVID‐19 risks and guidelines during the pandemic. Methods: Participants were Canadian dentists (N = 644) recruited through the email roster of nine provincial dental associations or regulatory bodies. This qualitative analysis was nested within a prospective longitudinal cohort study in which data were collected using online questionnaires at regular intervals from August 2020 to November 2021. To address the objective reported in this paper, a conventional qualitative content analysis method was applied to responses to three open‐ended questions included in the final questionnaire. Results: Participants encountered challenges and frustrations amid the COVID‐19 pandemic, grappling with diverse regulations and communications from dental bodies. While some bodies offered helpful guidance, many participants felt the need for improved communication on guidelines. Dentists urged for expedited, clearer and more frequent updates, expressing difficulty in navigating overwhelming information. Negative views emerged on the vague and unclear communication of COVID‐19 guidelines, contributing to confusion and frustration among participants. Conclusion: As COVID‐19 persists and in planning for future pandemics, these experiential findings will help guide regulatory bodies in providing clear, timely and practical guidelines to protect the health and safety of dentists, dental staff, patients and the public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF