Search

Background and purpose: Post‐ischaemic immune cell invasion into the brain is well characterized in animal stroke models and contributes to neuronal damage. Therefore, it represents a promising therapeutic target. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is easily accessible and may reflect cellular events within the parenchyma. However, comprehensive studies on CSF immune cells in patients with stroke are lacking. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we performed extensive immune‐cell profiling in CSF and peripheral blood of patients with acute ischaemic stroke and healthy controls. In patients with stroke, infarct size was quantified on follow‐up imaging. Results: Overall, 90 patients with ischaemic stroke and 22 controls were included in our study. After stroke, the total protein was increased (537.3 vs. 353.2 mg/L, P = 0.008) and the mean total white cell count was slightly but non‐significantly elevated (1.76 vs. 0.50 cells/μL, P = 0.059). Proportions of CSF lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes and their respective subsets did not differ between patients with stroke and controls. In addition, there were no associations between proportions of major leukocyte subsets in CSF and the time from symptom onset to CSF sampling, infarct size or infarct localization. Conclusions: Ischaemic stroke induces only a very slight increase of CSF immune cells without changes in the composition of immune cell subsets, thus indicating that parenchymal inflammation is not sufficiently reflected in the CSF. Our findings suggest that CSF is not a major invasion route for immune cells and that CSF cell analyses are not suitable as biomarkers to guide future immune therapies for stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize patients with ischemic stroke due to bacterial meningitis. Methods: In a single‐center retrospective study, we analyzed 102 patients with bacterial meningitis of which 19 had an ischemic stroke. Clinical characteristics, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses, and spatiotemporal distribution of infarcts were assessed. In addition, we searched PubMed from database inception to August 2021 for observational studies on ischemic stroke in patients with bacterial meningitis, and performed a meta‐analysis to investigate the frequency and timing of stroke as well as its effect on mortality. Results: In our cohort, 15 (78.9%) patients with stroke had an modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≥ 3 at discharge compared to 33 (39.8%) in patients without stroke (p < 0.01). Of 1,692 patients with bacterial meningitis from 15 cohort studies included in our meta‐analysis, cerebral infarcts were found in 332 (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13–0.20) patients. The occurrence of stroke was strongly associated with a higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.70–3.34, p < 0.0001). There was no association of any specific causative pathogen with the occurrence of stroke. Infarcts were mainly distributed in territories of arteries located in the vicinity to the infection focus and peaked at 3 to –7 days and at 2 weeks after onset of meningitis. In patients with ischemic stroke, vasculopathy was found in 63.2% and additional intracerebral hemorrhage in 15.8%. Interpretation: This study found that ischemic stroke due to bacterial meningitis is caused by cerebral vasculopathy located in the vicinity of the infection focus, and that the time course of infarctions might enable a therapeutic intervention. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:1094–1105 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]