Search

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is internationally defined as chest compressions and rescue breaths, and is a subset of resuscitation. First used for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, CPR is now frequently used for in‐hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with different causes and outcomes. Aims: This paper aims to describe clinical understanding of the role of in‐hospital CPR and perceived outcomes for IHCA. Methods: An online survey of a secondary care staff involved in resuscitation was conducted, focussing on definitions of CPR, features of do‐not‐attempt‐CPR conversations with patients and clinical case scenarios. Data were analysed using a simple descriptive approach. Results: Of 652 responses, 500 were complete and used for analysis. Two hundred eleven respondents were senior medical staff covering acute medical disciplines. Ninety‐one percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that defibrillation is part of CPR, and 96% believed CPR for IHCA included defibrillation. Responses to clinical scenarios were dissonant, with nearly half of respondents demonstrating a pattern of underestimating survival and subsequently showing a desire to offer CPR in similar scenarios with poor outcomes. This was unaffected by seniority and level of resuscitation training. Conclusions: The common use of CPR in hospital reflects the broader definition of resuscitation. Recapturing the CPR definition for clinicians and patients as only chest compressions and rescue breaths may allow clinicians to better discuss individualised resuscitation care to aide meaningful shared decision‐making around patient deterioration. This may involve reframing current in‐hospital algorithms and uncoupling CPR from wider resuscitative measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the NAP7 (National Audit Project 7) papers on peri-operative cardiac arrest. The author addresses criticism that there have been too many NAP7 papers, stating that all 12 papers went through peer review and were judged to meet publication standards. The papers were disseminated through various means, including open-access publishing, social media, author interviews, and podcasts. The author emphasizes the importance of reading the main results papers and specialist papers relevant to one's area of practice. The article provides references to specific papers on topics such as obstetrics, anaphylaxis, airway management, and resuscitation decisions. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Alongside medical science, educational efficiency and local implementation have been identified as the three leading themes that influence cardiac arrest survival outcomes. Where the medical science domain continues to inform the contemporary evidence for the optimal practice, the remaining two education themes continue to face criticism linked to the poor sustainability of clinician resuscitation skills, with a rapid decay in abilities often evident soon after training and certification. The European Resuscitation Council recently reasserted the importance of programmes to reflect educational best practices and learning theory. Discussion: This paper discusses a selection of key contemporary theoretical themes, which directly relate to several specific ongoing education concerns. Reccomendations: Beyond questioning the effectiveness of current conventions to achieve sustainable knowledge and skills for the long term, it is suggested that common approaches may not be sufficient to prepare clinicians or certify competency for the complexities of these future events and that a major pedagogical shift may be required to teaching and assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children's unexpected cardiac arrest warrants cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by kindergarten teachers. Yet, recent research revealed trained personnel reporting poor transfer of acquired skills during real‐world emergencies with conventional CPR training. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) training induces a greater sense of presence and agency than conventional CPR training and may be more effective in terms of increasing trainees' intention and initiative to perform CPR in real‐world emergencies. A quasi‐experiment was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the IVR‐based CPR training method in terms of enhancing the intention to perform CPR. The trial enrolled 50 participants, 25 of whom examined a child patient in an IVR virtual scenario, using an AED, and performed two rounds of two‐minute chest compressions. The remaining 25 participants were trained using a video with consistent content on a monitor. A generalised estimating equation analysis demonstrated that the IVR training method significantly increased prospective kindergarten teachers' self‐efficacy for performing CPR, positive attitudes towards CPR, and CPR knowledge. This advantage was also maintained after the five‐week follow‐up. Thus, CPR teaching via IVR looks to be an excellent way to enhance the intention to perform CPR and may be of great value in improving existing CPR training systems. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Many trainees who have received traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training hesitate to perform the skills learned in a real‐world emergency.The critical determinant of whether an individual performs a behaviour is the individual's 'intention' to perform that behaviour.Individual's self‐efficacy to perform CPR, attitudes towards CPR, and perceived social norms are three determinants that influence intention to perform CPR.Immersive media such as virtual reality may elicit more attitudinal changes and a greater sense of learner self‐efficacy than current mainstream media.What this paper adds The study's results indicated that compared to conventional technology‐supported video training, immersive virtual reality (IVR) training significantly increased participants' self‐efficacy about performing CPR, positive attitudes towards CPR and CPR knowledge.CPR training through IVR may enhance trainees' intention to perform CPR in real‐world emergencies.Implications for practice and/or policy The effectiveness of combining IVR technology into existing CPR training methods such as mixed reality training, which blends virtual environments with realistic mannequins, should be further examined in the future.IVR may be a more effective medium for enhancing the intention to perform behaviour than conventional technology. Future research could further experiment with the use of IVR as a behavioural intervention technique in education [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: In medical education, there are often several didactic methods for teaching and learning a specific medical skill. For educators, there are often pragmatic reasons to decide for one or another of them, such as costs, infrastructural requirements, time expenditure or qualification of the teacher. However, a central aspect to consider is the learning outcome: Does a new method achieve a similar learning success as an established standard method? To answer this question, we need an appropriate method to assess comparability of learning outcomes. Methods: In this paper, we present two essential statistical concepts that can address the issue of comparability of learning outcomes: Equivalence and non‐inferiority testing. We explain the ideas behind these concepts and illustrate them with an example data set. To clarify several concepts, we use theoretical examples from one selected field: the teaching and assessment of Basic Life Support (BLS). Conclusions: Equivalence and non‐inferiority tests can be powerful tools for comparing teaching and assessment methods. However, their correct application requires adequate knowledge about their strengths, pitfalls and application fields. The aim of this paper is to deliver this knowledge and to provide clinician researchers with a practical guidance to a successful application of these methods. In the latest addition to the Research Approaches section, Klasen and Sopka discuss the concepts of equivalence and non‐inferiority studies while highlighting the benefits and pitfalls of their application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a lifesaving emergency procedure. To increase survival rates, it is recommended to increase the number of high school students who know how to perform CPR. We have developed an immersive "Virtual Reality (VR) Resuscitation Training" to train the theoretical knowledge of CPR in which trainees must save the life of the patient in a virtual environment. This paper presents a randomized controlled study with a pre‐posttest design to explore whether a VR enhanced curriculum improves high school students' theoretical CPR knowledge. Forty students without previous CPR experience in the past year were randomly assigned to either the VR group or the standard group. The VR group had a significant higher increase of correct answers in comparison with the Standard group. More importantly, the gain in score on taking the correct sequence of CPR steps was significant favouring the VR‐enhanced protocol over the Standard protocol. Therefore, the use of a VR training for CPR training appears to be an effective learning method for non‐medical students and may be of great value skilling high school students in becoming adequate CPR providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this paper is to report the findings of the consultation rounds with former patients and health care professionals to inform the design of a qualitative study. We aimed to understand stakeholders' views regarding the relevance of a proposed study looking at the impact of patients witnessing cardiopulmonary resuscitation on other patients in hospital, the appropriateness of the proposed methodology and ethical aspects. We conducted an online survey (n = 22) and telephone interviews (n = 4) with former patients linked to the British Heart Foundation charity and a focus group (n = 15) with hospital health care professionals involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitation activities. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. The consultation rounds provided valuable advice on three major themes: conceptual aspects, methodological aspects and practical suggestions. The conceptual aspects were related to the relevance of the proposed study, the emotional impact for participating patients and how the social interaction among patients could influence the witnessing experience. Methodological advice included recruitment strategies and data collection methods such as the use of individual and focus group interviews, the timeframe of interviews with patients and the topics of the interview guides. In the third theme, practical suggestions were provided, such as strategies to advertise the study, improving the public's and participants' engagement throughout the study process and disseminating the findings. Overall, the study proposed in this consultation was considered relevant and worthy by patients and health care professionals to raise awareness and generate new evidence on an unconsidered aspect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and of patients' hospital experience. These stakeholders' consultation rounds constituted a valuable exercise to design high‐quality research based on a shared vision among researchers, service users and clinicians. They also provided pragmatic advice to inform critical care practice to support patients witnessing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The incidence of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation continues to increase worldwide largely due to greater awareness of the symptoms of cardiac events and increased attention to cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in the community. Globally, predicted survival rates after cardiopulmonary resuscitation have remained at 10% for decades and although patient outcome remains unpredictable, there is a positive trend in life expectancy. For a resuscitation attempt to be classed as successful, not only survival but also quality of life has to be evaluated. Aim The aim of this review was to examine literature that explores the quality of life ( QOL) for survivors' after CPR and the influence cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder ( PTSD) has had on their QOL. Review methods This review follows Whittemore and Knafl's framework for an integrative literature review. Electronic databases EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed and EMBASE were searched. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thirty-six papers published from January 2000 to June 2015 were included in this review. Results These papers represent a broad spectrum of research evaluating quality of life for survivors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The heterogeneous research methods and vast number of different research tools make it challenging to compare the findings. The majority of papers concluded that quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was generally acceptable. However, studies also described survivors' experience of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress and cognitive dysfunction. Conclusion A majority of papers reported an acceptable quality of life if the patient survived to hospital discharge. The heterogeneity in quantitative papers was noticeable and indicates a marked variance in patient outcomes. This review highlights the absence of specialized tools used to investigate survivors' experience of the event. Further exploration of the impact cardiopulmonary resuscitation has on the individual may improve ongoing rehabilitation and quality of life levels for survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a first aid survival technique used to recover victims of cardiac arrest. To learn CPR different handheld device applications have been proposed. Most of them are based on sophisticated graphics and interaction techniques that make them inaccessible to visually impaired people. In this paper, we propose CPRforBlind, a video game designed to introduce the main steps of the CPR protocol to visually impaired people. The game is composed of different mini‐games inspired by the CPR steps proposed by European Resuscitation Council. The player acts as a helper who has to save the victim by using tactile interaction to solve the challenges assigned to each mini‐game. To test the game, 16 participants from which 8 are blind have been considered. After and before playing the game participants answered different questionnaires related to CPR knowledge, playability and enjoyability. The obtained results are very promising detecting a great improvement on CPR knowledge. In addition, blind players enjoyed the game and found it easy to play. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Positioned within a hybrid of the human and technology, professional nursing practice has always occupied a space that is more than human. In nursing education, technology is central in providing tools with which practice knowledge is mobilized so that students can safely engage with simulated human patients without causing harm to real people. However, while there is an increased emphasis on deploying these simulated humans as emissaries from person-centred care to demonstrate what it is like to care for real humans, the nature of what is really going on in simulation-what is real and what is simulated-is very rarely discussed and poorly understood. This paper explores how elements of postcolonial critical thought can aid in understanding the challenges of educating nurses to provide person-centred care within a healthcare culture that is increasingly reliant on technology. Because nursing education is itself a hybrid of real and simulated practice, it provides an appropriate case study to explore the philosophical question of technology in healthcare discourse, particularly as it relates to the relationship between the human patient and its uncanny simulated double. Drawing on postcolonial elements such as the uncanny, diaspora, hybridity, and créolité, the hybrid conditions of nursing education are examined in order to open up new possibilities of thinking about how learning to care is entangled with this technological space to assist in shaping professional knowledge of person-centred care. Considering these issues through a postcolonial lens opens up questions about the nature of the difficulty in using simulated human technologies in clinical education, particularly with the paradoxical aim of providing person-centred care within a climate that increasingly characterized as posthuman. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relatives’ presence in connection with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and sudden death at the intensive care unit Within Norwegian intensive care units it is common to focus on the needs of the next of kin of patients undergoing end-of-life care. Offering emotional and practical support to relatives is regarded as assisting them in the initial stages of their grief process. It has also become usual to encourage relatives to be present at the time of death of close relatives. How can dignified end-of-life care coexist with the sometimes turbulent and dramatic character of intensive care in the highly technological environment of intensive care units? This paper describes a case study based on an incident that took place at the intensive care unit (ICU) of Trondheim University Hospital, Norway, in which the relatives of a newly deceased patient voiced unusually strong dissatisfaction with the way they were excluded in connection with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The next of kin's criticism highlights an important paradox as well as a degree of inconsistency in lifesaving and end-of-life care at the ICU. I argue that an investigation of the multiple identities within medical practice can illuminate the potential for clashes between lifesaving and end-of-life care, as described and analysed in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review paper summarises the key changes made to the resuscitation guidelines used in Australia and New Zealand. They were released by the Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation in January 2016. These are local adaptations of the evidence previously published in October 2015 by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). They are presented across the main working groups in ILCOR: ALS, BLS, paediatrics, neonates, acute coronary syndromes, first aid and 'Education, Implementation and Teams'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To trust someone is to have expectations of their behaviour; distrust often involves disappointed expectations. But healthy trust and distrust require a good understanding of which expectations are reasonable, and which are not. In this paper, I discuss the limits of trustworthiness by drawing on recent studies of trust in the context of defensive medicine, biobanking and cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between theory and practice has received considerable attention within the nursing literature. This paper uses qualitative data from debriefing interviews with nurses following episodes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to illustrate the complexities of translating sanitized theory into the messiness of practice. The interplay of affect and cognition on both learning from experience and on professional practice are explored. The feelings engendered by the CPR event and the labour required for their management form the second and major part of the paper. These are explored by examining the realities of a CPR event with its accompanying threat of death: success and failure, dignity versus indignity and the place of appropriate emotions throughout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information on the research paper published in February issue of the journal which discusses the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in refractory cardiac arrest and the survival rate of patients. Topics include treating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ECPR, improving and optimizing the quality of CPR by using mechanical CPR guided with endtidal CO2 (ETCO2), and focusing on quality of CPR than the time-based inclusion criteria.

Introduction Emergencies in radiology are infrequent but potentially lethal. Australian and New Zealand radiologists are advised to undergo resuscitation training at least every three years; however, little is known about their experience and confidence in managing common emergencies relevant to their clinical practice. This paper describes the current experience and confidence of radiologists and radiology trainees in Australia and New Zealand in the management of common medical emergencies. Methods A cross-sectional online survey of trainees and fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology collected data on training and learning preferences relating to resuscitation and life-support skills, access to emergency medical care, and knowledge, confidence and ability in managing a variety of medical emergencies. Results There were 602 responses to the survey (response rate 23.4%). The majority of respondents were interested in learning more about the management of contrast reactions, cardiac arrest, ischaemic chest pain and basic life support. Self-rated knowledge, confidence and ability were higher in respondents who had completed life-support training within the previous three years. In this group, however, more than 40% rated their ability at managing contrast reactions as poor or fair, while more than 60% rated their ability as poor or fair for management of cardiac arrest, basic life support, advanced life support and dosing of adrenaline. Preferred resuscitation training modalities included simulation, small-group tutorials and workshops. Conclusion Self-reported level of skill and expertise in the management of potential emergencies in radiology is suboptimal among a large number of respondents. Consideration should be given to addressing this by improving access to specific training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper reports a study to determine the experiences and attitudes of Turkish critical care nurses concerning family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Background. The debate surrounding family-member presence in resuscitation areas has been evolving since the 1980s. The practice of performing resuscitation of adults in the presence of family members is controversial and has stimulated discussion and debate worldwide. Design. A descriptive survey. Method. The survey was carried out in 2007 with 135 critical care nurses from two university hospitals in İzmir. A structured questionnaire was used, which incorporated a series of attitude statements that were rated using a three-point Likert scale. The attitudes of the nurses were explored in three areas: decision making, processes and outcomes of resuscitation. Results. Of the nurses, only 22·2% experienced a situation where family members were present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most of these nurses ( n = 20) had one or more negative experiences. The majority disagreed that family members should always be offered the opportunity to be with the patient during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The most common concerns for not favouring family-witnessed resuscitation were reported as performance anxiety, fear of causing psychological trauma to family members and increased risk of litigation. Conclusions. Many Turkish critical care nurses have no knowledge of family-witnessed resuscitation and do not support the practice. We suggest that Turkish critical care nurses should be informed by the international literature on the concept of family-witnessed resuscitation and the culturally appropriate policies concerning this subject should be changed in Turkish hospitals. Relevance to clinical practice. Most critical care nurses in Turkey are not supportive of family-witnessed resuscitation. All critical care nurses should be informed by the international literature on the concept of family-witnessed resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. Presence of patients’ families during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physicians’ and nurses’ opinions. Aim. This paper is a report of a study to determine the opinions of physicians and nurses who work in a university hospital intensive care unit and emergency department about the presence of patients’ families during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in these units. Background. Healthcare professionals have conflicting opinions about the presence of patients’ families during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Families who are allowed to be present have less fear and worry, feel they have supported their family member and are able to cope more easily. Method. The data for this descriptive questionnaire study were collected between November 2006 and January 2007. The respondents were 62 physicians and 82 nurses who worked in an emergency department or in cardiology or anaesthesia intensive care units in Turkey. The data were collected using a questionnaire and the responses summarized using frequencies and percentages. The chi-squared test was performed to test for differences in the opinion by profession, educational level, or number of years of working experience in the profession. Findings. The response rate was 79%. Of the respondents, 82·6% did not think it was appropriate for patients’ families to be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The most common concerns mentioned were that the family would interfere with the team’s activities (56·3%) and that resuscitation is a very traumatic procedure (43·6%). Conclusion. Policies need to be developed regarding this topic because the absence of policy can cause misunderstanding and differences in practice. Further research is needed to determine what public education is needed to facilitate implementation of such policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. Nurses’ involvement in ‘do not resuscitate’ decisions on acute elder care wards Aim. This paper reports the involvement of nurses in ‘do not resuscitate’ decision-making on acute elder care wards and their adherence to such decisions in the case of an actual cardiopulmonary arrest. Background. Previous literature showed that nurses are involved in half or less than half of ‘do not resuscitate’ decisions in hospitals, but their involvement in this decision-making on acute elder care wards in particular has not been investigated. Method. A questionnaire was sent in 2002 to the head nurses of all acute elder care wards in Flanders, Belgium ( n = 94). They were asked whether nurses had been involved in the last ‘do not resuscitate’ decision-making process on their ward and whether nurses ‘never’, ‘rarely’, ‘sometimes’, ‘often’ or ‘always’ started resuscitation in case of cardiopulmonary arrest of patients with ‘do not resuscitate’ status and of those without. Results. The response rate was 86·2% ( n = 81). In 74·7% of the last ‘do not resuscitate’ decisions on acute elder care wards in Flanders, a nurse was involved in the decision-making process. For patients with ‘do not resuscitate’ status, 54·3% of respondents reported that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ‘never’ started on their ward, ‘rarely’ on 39·5% and ‘sometimes’ on 6·2%. For patients without ‘do not resuscitate’ status, nurses started cardiopulmonary resuscitation ‘rarely’ or ‘sometimes’ on 22·2% of all wards, and ‘often’ or ‘always’ on 77·8%. Conclusion. To make appropriate ‘do not resuscitate’ decisions and to avoid rash decision-making in cases of actual cardiopulmonary arrest, nurses should be involved early in ‘do not resuscitate’ decision-making. If institutional ‘do not resuscitate’ guidelines were to stress more clearly the important role of nurses in all kinds of end-of-life decisions, this might improve the ‘do not resuscitate’ decision-making process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives. This paper examines issues of contention regarding current practices and suggests the application of the experiential theory of learning (incorporating reflective practice) to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training. Background. The need for formalized training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ACLS is well documented. However, the effectiveness of traditional training programmes has not been firmly established. The question still remains - how to best ensure transfer of learning enabling learners to apply classroom knowledge successfully in the clinical setting. It is argued that educators can no longer rely on traditional teaching methods and more effective learner-centred education techniques are required. Method. A review of available literature regarding ACLS training has been conducted for this discussion. Data sources and selection: MEDLINE, CINAHL, OVID, Expanded Academic and Proquest were searched using textwords. English-language articles related to CPR and ACLS practices and also experiential learning were reviewed. Additional references were also reviewed from the bibliographies and from citation searches on key articles. Articles related to CPR/ACLS and experiential learning practices published within the last 10 years were reviewed. Results. There is evidence that past ACLS training programmes have proven inconsistent and inadequate, with numerous studies reporting trainees have poor retention; and, therefore, ineffective ACLS skills as a result. Conclusions. The reviewed literature demonstrates that the need for effective ACLS training is clear. Increasing numbers of critically ill patients in hospitals means that it has never been more important to ensure the competence of healthcare professionals. Training must give learners a chance to pull together all aspects of ACLS and the use of experiential learning has the potential to achieve this aim. Relevance to clinical practice. It is argued that providing training designed and implemented using experimental learning enhances learning through critical thinking and reflection, and subsequently should improve ACLS outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports on a research study carried out in an independent hospital in the south east of England. The aim of the study was to assess the basic life support skills of nurses in order to compare the results with those reported for nurses in public hospitals. The findings show that the basic life support skills of the nurses studied are poor but no worse than those of their public sector colleagues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In many long-term care settings, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is regarded as an available treatment option. However, for the majority of long-term care residents the expected outcome following CPR is poor. This descriptive study explored the CPR decision-making process in two long-term care institutions. This was accomplished through the administration of questionnaires to nursing staff, residents, residents' family members and through completion of a chart review of deceased individuals. This paper primarily addresses the role of nurses in the CPR decision-making process in long-term care. Nurses were rarely explicitly involved in the CPR decision-making process. Knowledge deficits of nurses concerning the CPR policy at the institutions and the expected outcomes of CPR were identified. Also noted were inconsistencies between policy and practice, with CPR being withheld in practice more often than dictated by protocol. Strategies to facilitate the CPR decision-making process in long-term care settings are suggested, and specific roles for nurses in relation to CPR decision making are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Nursing has been described as a moral endeavour (Seedhouse, 1988; Berger et al., 1991), the art of dealing with ethical issues of right and wrong. • Within the nursing literature, ethical issues are a major topic for discussion. Berger et al. (1991) explain that this reflects larger societal concerns about ethics in business, industry and government. • The development of advanced technology and life-sustaining treatments such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has heightened the dilemmas of moral decision making. CPR was developed in the 1960s as an emergency life-saving procedure, although it is currently used on anyone who does not have a not-forresuscitation status (Anon., 1980). • In this paper, an ethical issue involving the decision of whether or not to resuscitate a stroke patient is discussed. An overview of the main ethical theories is presented because they provide a framework for an explication of ethical decisionmaking. The options available to those involved are then discussed in relation to relevant research. Finally, a conclusion is drawn from the ensuing situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two papers in this issue address the limits of surrogates' authority when making life-and-death decisions for dying family members or friends. Using palliative sedation as an example, Jeffrey Berger offers a conceptual argument for bounding surrogate authority. Since freedom from pain is an essential interest, when imminently dying, cognitively incapacitated patients are in duress and their symptoms are not manageable in any other way, clinicians should be free to offer palliative sedation without surrogate consent, although assent should be sought and every effort made to work with surrogates as harmoniously as possible. Ellen Robinson and her colleagues report on the implementation of a policy at Massachusetts General Hospital that supports do-not-resuscitate orders when cardiopulmonary resuscitation is likely to be ineffective or harmful, even if surrogates disagree. The 'Doing No Harm' policy at MGH allows for what MGH calls a 'medically indicated DNR' and what in some other places is called 'a unilateral DNR'-the writing of an order not to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation, regardless of surrogate disapproval. These kinds of DNR policies have emerged in some hospitals across the country and for much the same reason that Berger provides in his argument regarding palliative sedation. I support the reasoning and the policies in both the Berger and Robinson papers. However, as the authors would most likely agree, the problems they aim to remedy are not simply about the scope of surrogate and professional authority. They are also symptoms of inattention to professional obligations and system failures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors reflect on the paper of T. L'Ecuyer and colleagues on accepting prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) donors in pediatric heart transplant recipients. They mention that the authors explores the question on the existence of difference in recipient survival where donors received CPR greater than 30 minutes. They state that L'Ecuyer and colleagues show that the perceived risks in accepting prolonged CRP donors may not be as risky as it seems.

Presents information on several research papers related to emergency medicine that were published in different journal as of September 1, 2003. Severity and natural history of jack jumper ant venom allergy in Tasmania; Description of community competence in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Description of injuries from spider spines, not spider bites.