Search

Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of lifelong disability, but access to treatment in the chronic stages has significant barriers. Group-based, remotely delivered neurorehabilitation reduces costs, travel barriers, and infection risk; however, its feasibility for patients with ABI is not well-established. To investigate the feasibility of remotely group-based cognitive and mood therapies for persons with chronic ABI. Three hundred and eighty-eight adults with chronic ABI participated in group tele-neurorehabilitation modules comprising Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Goal Management Training®, Relaxation and Mindfulness Skills Training, and/or a novel Concussion Education & Symptom Management program. Assessments comprised quantitative metrics, surveys, as well as qualitative semi-structured interviews in a subset of participants. High retention, adherence, and satisfaction were observed. Facilitators of treatment included accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and convenience. Adoption of technology was high, but other people's technological interruptions were a barrier. Self-reported benefits specific to group-based format included improved mood, stress management, coping, interpersonal relationships, cognitive functioning, and present-mindedness. The present study examined chronic ABI patients' perceptions of telerehabilitation. Patients found remotely delivered, group-based mood, and cognitive interventions feasible with easy technology adoption. Group format was considered a benefit. Recommendations are provided to inform design of remotely delivered ABI programs. Group-based mood and cognitive telerehabilitation is feasible for persons with chronic acquired brain injury, with high reported satisfaction. Screening for technical proficiency and providing ongoing technical support improves therapy adherence and retention. Integration of clinical care and research is feasible for delivering remote therapies to persons with brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Addressing patient-clinician communication barriers to improve multiple chronic disease care is a public health priority. While significant research exists about the patient-clinician encounter, less is known about how to support patient-clinician communication about lifestyle changes that includes the context of people's lives. Data come from a larger photo-based primary care study collected from 13 participants who were adults 60 or older with at least two chronic conditions, in English, Chinese (Cantonese or Mandarin), or Spanish. We use discourse analysis of three examples as anchor points demonstrating different interactional pathways for the photo-based communication. Patients and clinicians can move smoothly through a pathway in which photos are shared, clinicians acknowledge and align with the patient's explanation, and clinicians frame their medical evaluations of food choices, nutrition suggestions, and shared goal-setting by invoking the voice of lifeworld (VOL). On the other hand, when clinicians solely press the voice of medicine (VOM) in their evaluations of patients' pictures with little attention to patients' presentations, it can lead to patient resistance and difficulty moving to the next activity. Because photo-sharing is still relatively novel, it offers unique interactional spaces for both clinicians and patients. Photo-sharing offers a sanctioned moment for a primary care visit to operate in the VOL and promote goal-setting that both parties can agree upon, even if clinicians and patients framed the activity as one in which patients' lifeworld choices should be assessed as medically healthy or unhealthy based on the ultimate judgment of clinicians operating from the VOM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]