Search

Haze pollution not only affects the quality of economic growth and the image of the government, but also seriously affects public health. With the improvement of climate risk perception, the public is actively seeking all kinds of risk management measures to combat the hazards of haze pollution. The study of the relationship between haze pollution, climate risk perception and the development of commercial health insurance is of great significance to the formulation of haze control policies and the improvement of social security system. This paper attempts to explore the relationship between haze pollution, climate risk perception and commercial health insurance demand by establishing static and dynamic models based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2005 to 2022. Also, the spatial spillover effects of haze pollution in different regions on the development of commercial health insurance in other regions are investigated by establishing a spatial Durbin model. It is found that (1) haze pollution has a lagged positive effect on the demand for commercial health insurance; (2) haze pollution has a significant spatial spillover effect on the development of commercial health insurance; (3) this study used Python technology to construct a climate risk perception index, and found that the moderating effect of the residents' perception of climate risk existed significantly, and that the residents might take other measures to manage the risk in the short term, but in the long term, the climate risk perception showed a positive correlation with the level of education. This paper provides implications for government departments and social media to strengthen education and publicity, improve residents' awareness of risk diversification, and deepen the concept of commercial health protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Public health policies are designed for specific subsets of the population. Evidence that a policy is effectively designed should be based on whether it effectively addresses its mission. A critical factor is determining whether utilization patterns reflect the mission and the efficacy of public health policies, particularly during early stages of implementation. We assert that utilization patterns can be effectively assessed using geographic information systems (GIS).Objective: This paper uses the Silver Alert program, a recently implemented public health policy, as a case for how and why GIS can be used to examine utilization patterns.Design: GIS are employed to visualize and spatially analyze a new health policy--North Carolina's Silver Alert policy. We use visualized data and spatial statistics to assess utilization patterns and mission adherence.Results: Results show disproportionate utilization patterns of the Silver Alert policy. In particular, an outstanding number of Silver Alerts were used in Wake County and its surrounding counties, which are both the political and media center of North Carolina. Other counties, including populous counties, had few if any alerts.Conclusion: Findings suggest that the North Carolina's Silver Alert policy needs to be adjusted to more effectively address its mission. We identify several factors that need further examination prior to a statewide evaluation. From this case study, we propose ways future programs, particularly the introduction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, might use GIS to examine utilization patterns as a means to better understand whether and in what ways the health care needs of the public are being met with such a policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this paper are to analyze the role of medical and health professions in creating and establishing the disability category. We also explore how the diagnosis, measurement, and treatment of disability have contributed to stigmatization and promoted social, political and economic inequality. Theories from a variety of disciplines are used to examine the ways that medicine and the health-related professions have contributed to the oppression of people with disabilities, including the maintenance of a 'medical/knowledge power differential,' reinforcement of the 'sick role,' and objectification of people with disabilities. We also explore opportunities for empowerment versus 'sick role' status. The medical and health professions are uniquely positioned to promote the empowerment of people with disabilities as active partners in their own health care. Replacing the biomedical model of disability with a socio-political model that prioritizes disease/health care management, wellness and prevention of further disability as opposed to treatments aimed at curing disability could facilitate the empowerment process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This literature review broadly examines disability in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The paper addresses the various types of disability in AD, as well as the presumed causes and the economic and social costs of such disability. The influence of various types of treatment of disability, particularly pharmacological is addressed, as are directions for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The debate over the impact of the new Medicare prescription drug benefit (Part D) has intensified in anticipation of its implementation. This paper contributes additional information related to the effect of different types of prescription drug coverage plans on use and expenditures among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.Cross-sectional design using data from the 2002 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS). The two dependent variables were (1) prescription drug use and (2) expenditures. The main independent variable was the type of drug insurance (Medicare FFS only [no Rx insurance], Medicare FFS + Rx insurance and Medicare HMO). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to test the effect of insurance type, and beneficiaries' characteristics, on likelihood and level of drug use, as well as expenditures. The findings showed that average total drug expenditures among Medicare FFS enrollees who had Rx insurance (non-HMO) were higher ($182.51) than that of Medicare FFS enrollees with no Rx insurance. In addition, the former group had a higher likelihood (any use) of using prescribed medications. On the other hand, no differences in the likelihood of use were detected between Medicare HMO and Medicare FFS (no Rx insurance) enrollees. However, Medicare HMO enrollees had a higher level of drug use. In conclusion, The differences in drug use and expenditures by insurance type imply that each party (Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans, employers) will have a different set of dis/incentives for involvement in Medicare Part D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been an important financial issue in the U.S. Medicare expenditures that health care expenses of Medicaid-Medicare dual eligibles (MMDE) are much higher than those of Medicare only beneficiaries (MOB). This paper compares health care use and health status of MMDEs and MOBs who are either Afro-American or white recipients. Using total health care use information from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2000, we find that the proportion of dual eligibles with chronic health conditions is higher by 4% than that of the Medicare only beneficiaries and that dual eligibles make more frequent uses of various health care services. The number of office-based physician visits and outpatient physician visits are higher for Afro-American dual eligibles than white dual eligibles. This finding seems to be contributed to by relatively high medical needs among dual eligibles. Higher utilization of agency-related home health services among Afro-American dual eligibles than among white dual eligibles is considered as a consequence of different ethnicity-specific responses to insurance coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The United States is the only western industrialized nation that fails to provide universal coverage and the only nation where health care for the majority of the population is financed by for-profit, minimally regulated private insurance companies. These arrangements leave one-sixth of the population uninsured at any given time, and they leave others at risk of losing insurance as a result of normal lVe course events. Political theorists of the welfare state usually attribute the failure of national health insurance in the United States to broader forces of American political development, but they ignore the distinctive character of the health care financing arrangements that do exist Medical sociologists emphasize the way that physicians parlayed their professional expertise into legal, institutional, and economic power but not the way this power was asserted in the political arena. This paper proposes a theory of stakeholder mobilization as the primary obstacle to national health insurance. The evidence supports the argument that powerful stakeholder groups, first the American Medical Association, then organizations of insurance companies and employer groups, have been able to defeat every effort to enact national health insurance across an entire century because they had superior resources and an organizational structure that closely mirrored the federated arrangements of the American state. The exception occurred when the AFL-CIO, with its national leadership, state federations and union locals, mobilized on behalf of Medicare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of political ideology and self-interest on the attitudes of medical students toward national health insurance. Previous empirical studies of the relative importance of ideology and self-interest in explaining attitudes and behavior have been conducted on general population samples. This is the first empirical test of the effects of these factors on the attitudes of professionals in general and of medical students in particular toward a policy issue which is important to their material interests, but which evokes ideological responses at the same time. The findings show that political ideology as well as objective and subjective self-interest are independent dimensions. Both factors are related strongly to medical students' attitudes toward national health insurance. Their relative strength varies considerably with the salience of the issue at hand. Almost uniformly, political ideology has a more pronounced impact on attitudes than does objective self-interest. The differences between the effects of political ideology and of subjective self-interest, however, are not always substantial or significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the health insurance movement, the provision of drugs has been one of the medical needs least well met. One prepaid medical care plan has pioneered in an effort to meet this need, and its precise experience is reported in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telepsychiatry is a cost-effective alternative to in-person psychiatric consultations. The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a sharp spike in the utilization of telepsychiatry due to ongoing restrictions on gatherings and traveling. In recognition of the importance of telemedicine in general, and telepsychiatry specifically, telemedicine practice guidelines and telepsychiatry operational guidelines have been released. Due to the rising trend in telemedicine, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDIA) incorporated teleconsultation health insurance coverage at a level on par with regular in-person consultations. In contrast, in the United States of America, private insurance coverage for telepsychiatry has been in vogue for some time. In this paper we draw comparisons between India and the United States on telepsychiatry and health insurance. We compare the evolving regulatory policies of these two countries in relation to existing insurances plans that are available, the challenges in implementation of new regulations and the possible ways to overcome the challenges to make telepsychiatry affordable to all. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]