Search

The aim of this study is to delineate the expression patterns of prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting protein 1 (Pin1), Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and Angiotensin II (ANG II) during the process of wound repair, and to ascertain the effects of Pin1, GDNF, and ANG II on the healing of wounds in a rat model. A total of 18 rats were allocated into three groups—sham (control), DMSO (vehicle control), and Pin1 inhibitor (treatment with juglone)—with six animals in each group. An animal model of wound healing was established, followed by the intraperitoneal administration of juglone. Tissue samples from the wounds were subsequently collected for histopathological evaluation. Expression levels of Pin1, GDNF, and Ang II were quantified. In addition, an in vitro model of wound healing was created using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), to assess cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation under conditions of juglone pre-treatment. The expression levels of Pin1, GDNF, and ANG II were notably elevated on 7-, and 10- days post-wound compared to those measured on 3-day. Contrastingly, pre-treatment with juglone significantly inhibited the expression of these molecules. Histological analyses, including HE (Hematoxylin and Eosin), Masson’s trichrome, and EVG (Elastic van Gieson) staining, demonstrated that vascular angiogenesis, as well as collagen and elastin deposition, were substantially reduced in the juglone pre-treated group when compared to the normal group. Further, immunohistochemical analysis revealed a considerable decrease in CD31 expression in the juglone pre-treatment group relative to the normal control group. Pin1 serves as a pivotal facilitator of wound repair. The findings indicate that the modulation of Pin1, GDNF, and ANG II expression impacts the wound healing process in rats, suggesting potential targets for therapeutic intervention in human wound repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative complications are vital factors affecting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for complex hepatectomy. The present study aimed to compare perioperative complications between laparoscopic and robotic complex hepatectomy (LCH vs. RCH). Patients with solitary HCC after complex hepatectomy were collected from a multicenter database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was adopted to control confounding bias. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors. 436 patients were included. After PSM, 43 patients were included in both the LCH and RCH groups. The results showed that compared to LCH, RCH had lower rates of blood loss and transfusion, and lower postoperative 30-day and major morbidity, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the RCH group (P = 0.026). Multivariable analysis showed RCH is an independent protective factor for reducing the 30-day morbidity, major morbidity and PHLF. RCH has advantages over LCH in the minimally invasive treatment of complex HCC, as it can reduce the incidence of postoperative morbidity. Therefore, RCH should be considered for patients with HCC who require complex hepatectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]