Search

• The net ecosystem carbon balance was extended for harvest residues (HR). • The balance term related to HR can be in the range of other cumulative carbon terms. • Therefore, it is imperative to consider HR in the carbon balance of croplands. • Soil carbon loss/gain are mostly controlled by the fast-decomposing carbon pools. Over the past two decades, major efforts have been made to quantify the extent to which and under what conditions croplands are sources or sinks for carbon. For this purpose, the net carbon stock change of the study site is typically quantified based on net CO 2 fluxes monitored with an eddy covariance or chamber system, on measured C import by organic fertilizer and C export by harvest. While in cropland studies this balance is usually referred to as net biome productivity (NBP), we prefer to use the term net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) here. NECB is basically the sum of the stock change of plant carbon (ΔPC) and soil organic carbon (ΔSOC). In the standard approach, the assumption is that at an annual cropland site the bulk of plant biomass is typically removed at harvest, and that ΔPC can therefore be neglected. In this case, ΔSOC equals NECB. In this paper we show that this assumption is problematic, particularly if in crop rotation systems the budget is determined over a single cropping period. The present contribution extends the concept of NECB to include harvest residues (HR) and applies it to a case study over a maize - winter wheat - winter wheat rotation at a cropland site in southwest Germany. In all three cropping periods, the sign of NECB was opposite that of ΔSOC. Accordingly, neglecting HR led to an incorrect result concerning the question whether the site is a sink or a source for soil carbon. Our findings demonstrate that for croplands HR must be included to obtain an accurate and meaningful carbon balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]