Search

Background It is increasingly clear that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are proinflammatory and cause low-grade systemic inflammation. However, it is currently unknown whether elevated plasma triglycerides are causally related to the development of psoriasis, a skin disorder driven by chronic inflammation. Objectives To determine if elevated plasma triglycerides are associated with increased risk of psoriasis in observational and Mendelian randomization analysis. Methods Consecutive individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study were included. We used plasma triglycerides (n = 108 043) and a weighted triglyceride allele score (n = 92 579) on nine known triglyceride-altering genetic variants. Genetic results were replicated in 337 159 individuals from the UK Biobank. Psoriasis was defined using the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10) code for hospital contact in the main analyses, and prescription of topical antipsoriatics for mild psoriasis in the sensitivity analysis. Results During a follow-up of median (range) 9.3 (0.1–15.1) years from 2003 to 2015 through 2018, 855 (1%) individuals were diagnosed with psoriasis by ICD-10 in the observational analysis and 772 (1%) in the Mendelian randomization analysis. In the observational analysis, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for psoriasis by ICD-10 was 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.39] per doubling in plasma triglycerides with a corresponding causal odds ratio of incident psoriasis of 2.10 (95% CI 1.30–3.38). Causality was confirmed from data from the UK Biobank. Results were similar but slightly attenuated when we used topical antipsoriatic prescriptions for mild psoriasis. Conclusions Elevated plasma triglycerides are associated with an increased risk of psoriasis in observational and Mendelian randomization analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The long-term pulmonary sequelae of mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to characterize lung function trajectories in individuals with mild COVID-19 from preinfection to 2 years postinfection. Methods We reinvited participants 2 years after infection from our matched cohort study of the Copenhagen General Population who had initially been examined 5.4 months after infection. We repeated lung tests and questionnaires. Linear mixed models were used to estimate dynamics in lung volumes in individuals with COVID-19 patients versus uninfected controls over two intervals: from pre-infection to 6 months postinfection and 6 months postinfection to 2 years postinfection. Results 52 individuals (48.6%) attended the 2-year examination at median 1.9 years (interquartile range, 1.8–2.4) after COVID-19, all with mild infection. Individuals with COVID-19 had an adjusted excess decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 13.0 mL per year (95% confidence interval [CI], −23.5 to −2.5; P =.02) from before infection to 6 months after infection compared to uninfected controls. From 6 to 24 months after infection, they had an excess decline of 7.5 mL per year (95% CI, −25.6–9.6; P =.40). A similar pattern was observed for forced vital capacity (FVC). Participants had a mean increase in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) of 3.33 (SD 7.97) between the 6- and 24-month examination. Conclusions Our results indicate that mild COVID-19 infection affects lung function at the time of infection with limited recovery 2 years after infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]