Search

An enhanced dung beetle optimization algorithm (EDBO) is proposed for nonlinear optimization problems with multiple constraints in manufacturing. Firstly, the dung beetle rolling phase is improved by removing the worst value interference and coupling the current solution with the optimal solution to each other, while retaining the advantages of the original formulation. Subsequently, to address the problem that the dung beetle dancing phase focuses only on the information of the current solution, which leads to the overly stochastic and inefficient exploration of the problem space, the globally optimal solution is introduced to steer the dung beetle, and a stochastic factor is added to the optimal solution. Finally, the dung beetle foraging phase introduces the Jacobi curve to further enhance the algorithm's ability to jump out of the local optimum and avoid the phenomenon of premature convergence. The performance of EDBO in optimization is tested using the CEC2017 function set, and the significance of the algorithm is verified by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Friedman test. The experimental results show that EDBO has strong optimization-seeking accuracy and optimization-seeking stability. By solving four engineering optimization problems of varying degrees, EDBO has proven to have good adaptability and robustness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pathfinder algorithm (PFA) starts with a random search for the initial population, which is then partitioned into only a pathfinder phase and a follower phase. This approach often results in issues like poor solution accuracy, slow convergence, and susceptibility to local optima in the PFA. To address these challenges, a multi-strategy fusion approach is proposed in the symmetry-enhanced, improved pathfinder algorithm-based multi-strategy fusion for engineering optimization problems (IPFA) for function optimization problems. First, the elite opposition-based learning mechanism is incorporated to improve the population diversity and population quality, to enhance the solution accuracy of the algorithm; second, to enhance the convergence speed of the algorithm, the escape energy factor is embedded into the prey-hunting phase of the GWO and replaces the follower phase in the PFA, which increases the diversity of the algorithm and improves the search efficiency of the algorithm; lastly, to solve the problem of easily falling into the local optimum, the optimal individual position is perturbed using the dimension-by-dimension mutation method of t-distribution, which helps the individual to jump out of the local optimum rapidly and advance toward other regions. The IPFA is used for testing on 16 classical benchmark test functions and 29 complex CEC2017 function sets. The final optimization results of PFA and IPFA in pressure vessels are 5984.8222 and 5948.3597, respectively. The final optimization results in tension springs are 0.012719 and 0.012699, respectively, which are comparable with the original algorithm and other algorithms. A comparison between the original algorithm and other algorithms shows that the IPFA algorithm is significantly enhanced in terms of solution accuracy, and the lower engineering cost further verifies the robustness of the IPFA algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]