Search

It is generally recognized that when deciding on a significance level for a test, its power must also be taken into account. Determination of the optimal significance level, however, is not a straightforward task. It is pointed out here that by use of critical significance level and power we can achieve the usual objective of making a reject-or-accept decision without explicitly determining the optimal significance level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cronholm and Revusky [4] have proposed a rank test based on independent subexperiments for the comparison of a treatment effect with a control when the treatment is destructive but the control produces at most a transient effect. This article provides a thorough study of its performance under two sampling situations. With the aid of a computer, the exact small sample power of the test is evaluated for some important alternatives. A modification of the test is proposed for the situation where numerical measurements are available rather than merely the ranks within each stage. The modification is found to substantially improve the power. Both tests are shown to be unbiased. Finally, the Pitman asymptotic efficiencies are obtained and comparisons are made with the appropriate Wilcoxon tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A double sample test for a hypothesis concerning the mean mu of a normal random variable with unknown variance sigma[sup 2] is presented in this note. This test is an alternative to the usual single sample t test and is made by taking samples at two stages. After the first sample has been observed the hypothesis is rejected, accepted or a second sample is taken. This double sample test is a modification of a double sample test suggested by D. Owen. However, for the test being suggested here if the second sample is taken the information from the first sample is used in making the final decision. A table is included which is a tabulation of the rejection and acceptance points for various sample sizes and alpha = .05 and alpha = .01. Additional tables are included which give some power values and expected sample sizes for the new test and Owen's test. These power values are compared with power values of various single sample t tests. Conclusions about desirable sample sizes are presented for both the new test and Owen's test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an earlier paper [5] the authors compared the power of the BLUS test with the probability of a correct decision of the Durbin-Watson bounds test. A method to compute the distribution of the Von Neumann ratio under the null hypothesis and under the alternative hypothesis was given. In the present paper the latter method is used to tabulate the BLUS-test statistic and to compute the exact significance points of the Durbin-Watson test for several examples. Powers of both tests are computed and compared. It appears that, for the cases considered, the power of the exact Durbin-Watson test exceeds that of the BLUS procedure, while the latter is greater than the probability of a correct decision in the Durbin-Watson bounds test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The problem of iterated tests of hypotheses has been treated from the standpoint of multiple decision theory. Under the assumption that there is a UMP test (not necessarily similar) for each component hypothesis, a procedure has been developed which ensures an upper bound for various probabilities of misclassification and which maximizes the probabilities of correct classification in some class. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Explores the use of statistical tests for decision-making in regional geographical construction in the United States. Chi square; Variance analysis; Relationship between regional constructs and the areal dispersion of selected traits within regional frames.