Search

The AusAEM airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey is one of the main components of the Exploring for the Future program. This Australian Government initiative is aimed at enhancing the geoscientific information available, to support resource exploration and to showcase Australia as a destination for investment opportunities. Regional geophysical mapping programs are the basis for informed mineral exploration and have enabled the building of a continental-scale inventory of Australia's potential resource endowment. They also provide elements of the scientific backing for decision-making and answering a range of different geoscientific questions. The latest of these airborne initiatives AusAEM is composed of a series of wide line-spaced studies targeting acquisition of data for regional mapping in area of new frontiers; it is gathering data and unveiling information on extents never previously attempted by AEM surveys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents the application of a novel trans-dimensional sampling approach to a time domain airborne electromagnetic (AEM) inverse problem to solve for plausible conductivities of the subsurface. Geophysical inverse field problems, such as time domain AEM, are well known to have a large degree of non-uniqueness. Common least-squares optimisation approaches fail to take this into account and provide a single solution with linearised estimates of uncertainty that can result in overly optimistic appraisal of the conductivity of the subsurface. In this new non-linear approach, the spatial complexity of a 2D profile is controlled directly by the data. By examining an ensemble of proposed conductivity profiles it accommodates non-uniqueness and provides more robust estimates of uncertainties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The characterisation of the thickness and geology of cover sequences significantly improves targeting for mineral exploration in buried terrains. Audio-frequency Magnetotelluric (AMT) data is applicable to characterise cover sequences, where their conductivity (inverse resistivity) can be differentiated. We present a regional study from the under-cover East Tennant region in the Northern Territory (Australia) where we have applied deterministic and probabilistic inversion methods to derive 2D and 1D resistivity models. We integrated these models with information of co-located basement penetrating boreholes (lithological and geophysical logs) to ground-truth and validate the models and to improve geophysical interpretations. In the East Tennant region, borehole lithology and wireline logging demonstrate that the modelled AMT response is largely controlled by the mineralogy of the cover and basement rocks. The bulk conductivity is due primarily to bulk mineralogy and the success of using the AMT models to predict cover thickness is shown to be dependent on whether the bulk mineralogy of cover and basement rocks are sufficiently different to provide a detectable conductivity contrast. Our investigation of a range of geological scenarios that differ in thickness, complexity and geology of the cover and basement rocks suggests that in areas where there is sufficient difference in bulk mineralogy and where the stratigraphy is relatively simple, AMT models predict the cover thickness with high certainty. In more complex scenarios interpretation of AMT models may be more ambiguous and requires integration with other data (e.g. drilling, wireline logging, potential field modelling). Overall, we conclude that the application of the method has been validated and the results compare favourably with borehole stratigraphy logs once geological (i.e. bulk mineralogical) complexity is understood. This demonstrates that the method is capable of identifying major litho-stratigraphic units with resistivity contrasts. Our results have assisted with the planning of regional drilling programs and have helped to reduce the uncertainty and risk associated with intersecting targeted stratigraphic units in covered terrains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]