Search

Expansive soils are extremely susceptible to swelling and shrinkage associated with seasonal changes in their moisture content. This can cause serious damage to structures constructed on expansive soils. Stabilization using additives is widely used to mitigate the concerns of expansive soils by controlling the changes in volume, thereby increasing the strength and durability of the soils. Multistabilizers, including a low percentage of conventional additives with nonconventional additives, can reduce the costs of stabilization. The performance of the stabilized soil can be enhanced by admixture optimization to ascertain that the agent's ratios are quite adequate to meet the optimal levels of modification. Unfortunately, despite the development of advanced techniques for investigating the stabilization of expansive soil, limited studies are devoted to the optimization of admixture to soils. Hence, in this research, an approach based on rough set theory, a mathematical data mining approach, is presented for multiagent optimization for efficient treatment of expansive soils. The multiadditives used in this study are almond shell ash (ASA), volcanic rock dust (VRD), and portland cement (PC). The differential free swell test, the California bearing ratio test, and the unconfined compressive strength test were applied for assessing the characteristics of the stabilized soil specimens. The obtained results and the confirmatory tests demonstrated that a combination of 20% ASA and 20% VRD with 8% PC provides the optimum results in the properties of expansive soil. The microstructural analysis denoted an enhanced modification of the soil engineering properties. The outcomes of this research confirm that the rough set optimization procedure is highly suitable for application in multiagent optimization for the efficient treatment of expansive soils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The results of the unconfined compressive strength tests provided in the paper under discussion show the highest shear strength obtained with the geotextile layer placed at a similar depth. On the other hand, from the results shown in the figure, it appears that the direct shear test consisted of only one layer of geotextile located at midheight in the shear box mainly to determine the resistance it afforded. Apart from tests reported as having been done thrice in relation to the direct shear box test, no mention is made whether the same scheme was used for the swelling and unconfined compressive strength tests. Is it to be interpreted as the result for the unreinforced sample added to the result for the geotextile layer, or is it to be interpreted as the result for only the geotextile layer?. [Extracted from the article]

The original paper explicitly reports that large direct shear tests were performed to quantify the shear strength of geotextile-reinforced expansive soil subgrade. The writers agree with the discusser about the critical soil mechanics of geotextile-reinforced and unreinforced expansive soil; however, in the original scope of work was limited to and focused on assessing the interface efficiency of geotextile-reinforced expansive soil. 6(b-d), which compared different configurations of the geotextile layer test sections with the unreinforced expansive soil test section. [Extracted from the article]

This paper presents, by way of comparison, the effect of fly ash on the volume change of two different types of clay, one a highly plastic expansive clay and the other a nonexpansive clay, also of high plasticity. Expansive clays swell on absorbing water and shrink on drying. Nonexpansive clays undergo large compression at high water contents. The effect of fly ash content on free swell index, swell potential, and swelling pressure of expansive clays was studied. Compression index and secondary consolidation characteristics of both expansive and nonexpansive clays were also determined. Swell potential and swelling pressure, when determined at constant dry unit weight of the sample (mixture), decreased by nearly 50% and, when determined at constant weight of clay, increased by nearly 60% at 20% fly ash content. Compression index and coefficient of secondary consolidation of both the clays decreased by 40% at 20% fly ash content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]