Search

Purpose: Nature has been found to improve and promote health and prevent disease. Nature-based rehabilitation (NBR) delivered as part of neurorehabilitation is a developing approach. Yet to date the research is sparse. Following an acquired brain injury (ABI), people often experience impairments that cause limitations in activity and participation in daily life, which can impact the quality of life long-term. NBR delivered in neurorehabilitation has previously been explored from the perspective of occupational therapists and physiotherapists, however, to date patients' experiences are yet to be explored. This study aims to explore patients' experiences and perspectives of NBR delivered as part of standard neurorehabilitation. Methods: This qualitative study had a constructivist and phenomenological design. Semi-structured focus group interviews were carried out across three healthcare settings in Denmark with 17 participants. Data was analysed using content analysis. Results: The analysis generated three categories: 1. Outdoor versus indoor environment, 2. The natural environment as a co-therapist, and 3. Interrelatedness. Conclusion: The study provides insight into participants' experiences of NBR. They reported that interacting with the natural environment as part of neurorehabilitation enhanced activity. Moreover, being in nature increased their self-efficacy, sense of autonomy, community spirit, cooperation, and joy, and led to a feeling of peace. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Nature-based rehabilitation (NBR) delivered as part of neurorehabilitation provides an alternative to indoor rehabilitation. The natural environment offers multisensory stimulation, sensory-motor training, and opportunities for mental restoration. NBR promotes social engagement, cooperation, and feelings of being in the same boat and may increase autonomy, self-efficacy, activity, and participation. NBR can be designed and delivered in a way where the natural environment and the intervention promote individual and group rehabilitation. The benefits of NBR in neurorehabilitation for patients appear to be an underexposed topic, and the intervention may provide an opportunity for improving rehabilitation for patients with acquired brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMethodsResultsConclusions\nIMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONPost-stroke sequelae among elderly often lead to a more inactive life while carrying a risk of overburdening close relatives. The objective of the present study was to determine if a novel self-management neuro-rehabilitation intervention added to usual treatment for people with stroke over the age of 65 years improved their self-efficacy.This randomised controlled trial included participants two weeks before discharge from subacute rehabilitation. All participants received usual treatment. The intervention entailed an add-on of six to eight self-management sessions lasting 45–60 min within a period of nine months after discharge. This novel neuro-rehabilitation intervention focused on promoting growth, development and self-efficacy by facilitating the participants’ self-management strategies regarding their activities and social network. All participants were assessed at baseline, three months and nine months after discharge. The primary outcome was self-efficacy measured by the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.Sixty-nine individuals with stroke aged > 65 years were randomised. Their mean(SD) age was 76(6) years; 32 (46%) were female. No significant difference was found between the groups at baseline. Improvement recorded in the intervention group did not significantly differ from that of the control group with regard to primary outcome or secondary outcomes.This novel self-management intervention had no significant effect measured by the primary outcome self-efficacy or quality of life. Furthermore, no impact was observed on participation and autonomy compared with usual treatment.Clinical trial registration—URL: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03183960. Registered on 12 June 2017. The present study testing a novel self-management neuro-rehabilitation intervention for people with stroke aged more than 65 years failed to improve self-efficacy, quality of life, and impact on participation and autonomy.Post hoc analyzes showed a lower caregiver burden at three and nine months in the intervention group as compared to the control group.The approach of perceiving the stroke individual and the informal caregiver as one unit (dyad), involving both in decisions regarding everyday activities and roles in everyday life especially within their shared part of life, appears important and warrants further development.The present study testing a novel self-management neuro-rehabilitation intervention for people with stroke aged more than 65 years failed to improve self-efficacy, quality of life, and impact on participation and autonomy.Post hoc analyzes showed a lower caregiver burden at three and nine months in the intervention group as compared to the control group.The approach of perceiving the stroke individual and the informal caregiver as one unit (dyad), involving both in decisions regarding everyday activities and roles in everyday life especially within their shared part of life, appears important and warrants further development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This scoping review explores the characteristics of a meaningful life appraised by adults living with an acquired neurological impairment. Introduction: Limitations in function, activity or participation following a neurological injury or disease imposes comprehensive changes on the every-day life of the affected person and close relatives. Including patients' perception of a meaningful life is pivotal to facilitate motivation and individualize rehabilitation efforts to address the patients' wishes, hopes, needs, and preferences. Surprisingly, only little research has been devoted to illuminating what a meaningful life is from the impaired person's perspective. Hence, a scoping review of existing knowledge is needed to facilitate person-centered high-quality rehabilitation and research initiatives. Inclusion criteria: All studies, published in English or Scandinavian languages describing a meaningful life as experienced by adult persons with neurological impairment were included. No search date range filter was selected. Methods: This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews according to a published protocol. A three-step search strategy was conducted in the databases PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Embase. At least two independent researchers conducted inclusions and exclusions, data extraction, and analyses. Covidence software was used to manage the information. Findings: We identified 307 studies. Of these, 20 were included and quality assessed. Findings are reported in accordance with the PRISMA- SCR checklist and descriptively presented mapped in three main domains and 10 ten sub-domains. Conclusion: Current literature conveys no clear definition or perception of what a meaningful life is. However, across the 20 included studies, the following main characteristics were stepped forward as particularly significant for adults living with an acquired neurological impairment in regard to achieving a meaningful life: i) to be part of meaningful relationships and meaningful activities; ii) to become confident with one's perceived identity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the perception of "relatives" during the rehabilitation of young adults with severe acquired brain injury (SABI). This longitudinal qualitative study followed eight young adults with a SABI from hospital discharge to a year and a half after discharge. The design encompassed professional records, interviews, and surveys, including a name generator list completed by the young adults and focus group interviews with both their families and professionals. We apply a sociological theoretical framework concerning friendship, and we employ social network analysis (SNA) methodology to capture, visualise, and analyse the young adults' significant social relations. Social relations engaged as relatives during rehabilitation are to a large extent determined by the perceptions of professionals and the parents of the young adult. These perceptions contain a limited number of social relations, with priority given to biological and juridical ties. This might reflect the reduced social support available for the young adult, who initially had a much larger social network. The authors suggest a professional rethinking of who "relatives" are as well as considering these social ties as dynamic. Rehabilitation professionals must be aware of and pay attention to differing perceptions that exist as to who qualifies as significant social relations in order to reconsider the practical implementation of relative involvement. The perception of who relatives are during the rehabilitation process should be reconsidered and extended to include who the young adult perceive as significant social relations. Relatives are not a fixed entity and should be considered dynamically throughout the rehabilitation process. Social relations of the young adult must to a larger extent be considered during rehabilitation to prevent social isolation in the long run. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nature-based rehabilitation (NBR) is increasingly used within neurorehabilitation. The theoretical base is rooted in traditional neurorehabilitation professions, especially physiotherapy and occupational therapy, and relate to nature-based approaches. Objective: The objective was to explore the therapists' experiences of and rationale for applying NBR in neurorehabilitation when providing NBR to patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Patients with ABI often experience severe consequences impacting their rehabilitation, activity, participation and quality of life. Qualitative focus group interviews with therapists were conducted at two Danish rehabilitation hospitals, Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Center (HNRC) (Hospital 1) and Vejlefjord Rehabilitation (VFR) (Hospital 2). These are highly specialized neurorehabilitation hospitals for patients in the acute-subacute and subacute-chronic phases. HNRC has several sensory gardens and VFR has a park and an inlet nearby. Content analysis was employed to analyze the interviews. An occupational perspective of health was a frame to analyze and conceptualize the results. The analysis produced two main categories: What does nature offer – approach and rationale; Therapeutic rationale for conducting NBR. The therapists applied known theories and methods; they perceived the natural environment as an extended room for training and activity, as a means for targeted rehabilitation and beneficial to the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inequalities in illness, service provision, and outcomes are well documented in the Nordic universal welfare state. The ways in which inequalities are produced during illness recovery trajectories remain largely unknown. Long-term brain injury rehabilitation in this context provides a window into veiled aspects of inequality and the underlying mechanisms. We examine inequality empirically by combing framing field structures with the classed abilities of families to mobilise capital after a severe acquired brain injury (severe ABI). Using a Bourdieuan theoretical framework, informed by the concepts of field, doxa, cultural health capital (CHC), and rehabilitation capital (RC), we designed a longitudinal case study encompassing professional records, observations, and interviews that tracked and analysed subjects' trajectories. We found that families' consistent accumulation and conversion of capital was crucial after a severe ABI because of the multifaceted rehabilitation process involving many different field specific agendas and doxas. This study supplements previous concepts (CHC and RC) developed in a health care context by including other rehabilitation contexts. These disparities in forms of capital amongst social classes result in winners and losers and were reflected in the rehabilitation trajectories of the young adults, characterised by continuity on one extreme and broken trajectories on the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This scoping review explores the constitution of a meaningful life as perceived by adults with acquired neurological impairment following an injury or a disease. Introduction: A neurological injury or disease imposes extensive life changes on the affected person and his or her close relatives. Including the patients' perception of a meaningful life is crucial to facilitate adjustment of any rehabilitation initiatives to the patients' wishes, hopes, needs, and preferences. Even so, the descriptions and common traits of a meaningful life from the impaired person's perspective are scarcely covered in the literature. Hence, a scoping review of existing knowledge is needed to facilitate quality rehabilitation and research initiatives. Inclusion criteria: All studies, regardless of their design, are included provided they describe a meaningful life as considered or experienced by persons aged 18 years or more with neurological impairment. Methods: A PICo framework defines the search algorithms used in the databases MEDLINE, Cinahl, PsycINFO and Embase. Using Covidence, the scoping review systematically organizes the identified articles to provide a broad description of the study phenomenon. Furthermore, titles, abstracts, and full-text articles are screened independently by two reviewers to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. In case of disagreement, a third and fourth reviewer are consulted. The scoping will be reported according to the PRISMA- SCR checklist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke has been described as a rupture of current life, causing changes in the patient's identity. This has important consequences for the patient's life after stroke. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of science on the subject and also a lack of consistency in how to confront this in rehabilitation. Aim: The aim of this study is to explore how interaction between patient and physiotherapist is conducted and how an approach inspired by phenomenology might support and develop identity. Design and Methods: A qualitative study based on empirical data consisting of 146 short videos of physiotherapist and patient interactions as well as observations and interviews of physiotherapists and patients. Twelve patients were included, and data was constructed throughout their rehabilitation process (on average 2.5 years). Data was analyzed using an analytical model for multimodal interaction. Result: Four themes emerged: 1) feedback as a bodily knowledge; 2) control of the process; 3) adjustment; and 4) the bodily approach. The results revealed the importance of approaching the patient body as both an object and a subject in order to interact with the patient's bodily knowledge. Conclusion: A phenomenological approach to the patient can support the patient's embodied knowledge, and can thereby support and develop the patient's identity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rehabilitation process after a stroke transits through different treatment options organised in different settings, which thereby structure the patient's possibilities for constructing identity. To investigate how physiotherapy located in hospitals, municipal rehabilitation, and private clinics during rehabilitation after stroke provide different practices related to the patient body and how this creates different and opposed positions for construction identity after stroke. A qualitative longitudinal study based on empirical data that followed 12 patients with stroke through their rehabilitation, consisted of observations of interactions between physiotherapists and patients, as well as individual in-depth interviews with physiotherapists and patients. Building on Bourdieu's notions of field, capital, and habitus, different bodily habitus seemed to work as capital throughout the rehabilitation process. Positions available for habitus were around the disembodied body, the malfunctioning body, the defective body, the remodelled body, and the body altered. These different bodies interwove and shifted across the different sites and phases of the patient's rehabilitation. The relations between patients, physiotherapists and field constructed different bodily positions in the physiotherapeutic practice, where some bodies were included while other bodies were excluded. This shaped varying practices and different potentials for the patients' identity reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]