Search

Aims We sought to explore the latent classifications of psychosocial adaptation in young and middle-aged patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and analyse the characteristics of different profiles of AMI patients. Methods and results A cross-sectional study was performed in 438 Chinese young and middle-aged patients with AMI. The investigation time was 1 month after discharge. Three different self-report instruments were distributed to the participants, including the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Social Support Rating Scale. The seven dimensions of the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale were then used to perform a latent profile analysis. All participants signed informed consent forms in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Finally, a total of 411 young and middle-aged AMI patients were enrolled. Three distinct profiles were identified, including the 'well-adapted group' (44.8%), 'highlight in psychological burdens group' (25.5%), and 'poorly adapted group' (29.7%). The influencing factors included stress perception, social support, occupational type, and marital status (P < 0.05). Conclusion The psychosocial adaptation of young and middle-aged AMI patients can be divided into three profiles. Clinical nurses can carry out individualized psychological interventions according to the characteristics of patients in different potential profiles to improve the psychosocial adaptation of patients and the prognosis of their disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Publicized adverse events after vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) raised concern among patients with coronary atherosclerosis disease (CAD). We sought to study the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and long-term clinical outcomes including ischaemic and bleeding events among patients with CAD. Methods and results Inpatients diagnosed with CAD by coronary angiography, without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, were included between 1 January and 30 April 2021, and underwent follow-up until 31 January 2022. Two doses of inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, BBIBPCorV, or WIBP-CorV) were available after discharge, and the group was stratified by vaccination. The primary composite outcomes were cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularization, ischaemic stroke, venous thrombo-embolism, or peripheral arterial thrombosis. The bleeding outcomes were Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding. Cox regression models with vaccination status as a time-dependent covariate were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for the outcomes. A propensity score matching method was used to reduce confounding biases. This prospective cohort study included 2078 individuals with CAD, 1021 (49.1%) were vaccinated. During a median follow-up of 9.1 months, 45 (4.3%) primary composite outcomes occurred in the unvaccinated group, and 33 (3.2%) in the vaccinated group. In Cox regression, the adjusted HR was 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–1.93]. The adjusted HR for the bleeding outcomes associated with vaccination was 0.81 [95% CI 0.35–1.19]. After matching, the adjusted HR for the primary composite outcomes associated with vaccination was 1.06 [95% CI 0.57–1.99] and for the bleeding outcomes was 0.91 [95% CI 0.35–2.38]. Similar results were found in the seven prespecified subgroups. No grade 3 adverse reactions after vaccination were recorded. Conclusion Our results indicated no evidence of an increased ischaemic or bleeding risk after vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among Chinese patients with CAD, with limited statistical power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Within this context, Xu I et al i .[9] provide new data from the FAVOR III China trial, which sought to determine whether the peri-procedural use of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to guide lesion selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might improve clinical outcomes, compared with angiography-guidance alone. Accordingly, a greater proportion of lesions with QFR <= 0.80 was treated in the QFR-guided group than in the angiography-guided group [1990 (96.7%) of 2058 lesions vs. 1843 (91.1%) of 2023 lesions]. Keywords: Fractional flow reserve; Quantitative flow ratio; Non-invasive physiological assessment; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Major adverse cardiovascular events EN Fractional flow reserve Quantitative flow ratio Non-invasive physiological assessment Percutaneous coronary intervention Major adverse cardiovascular events e78 e80 3 09/01/22 20220701 NES 220701 Pressure wire-based physiological assessment with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) more accurately identifies flow-limiting lesions than angiographic assessment alone. [Extracted from the article]