Search

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22.q11.2 DS) is a genetic syndrome resulting from a microdeletion on chromosome 22. It has a diverse array of manifestations, and most cases are diagnosed early in childhood. We present the case of a 38-year-old female born in a developing country who presented to our clinic to establish care for a history of primary hypothyroidism. She was clinically and biochemically euthyroid on thyroid supplementation. She was also noted to have hypocalcemia in the setting of low PTH, for which the patient was previously prescribed calcitriol. Given a history of cleft palate, abnormal facial features, mild recurrent sinopulmonary infections, and her endocrine history (including short stature with height in the 6th percentile), genetic testing was obtained. She was diagnosed with a heterozygous whole gene deletion of the TBX1 gene. Additional genetic evaluation demonstrated a 2.6-Mb microdeleted segment of the 22a11.2 region encompassing 62 genes. The patient was referred to cardiology for evaluation of cardiac involvement given a history of tachyarrhythmia. This case highlights challenges in diagnosis and the implications of a delayed diagnosis of 22.q11.2 DS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) results in physical, cognitive, and behavioral issues. Although it is the most common microdeletion syndrome, there remains a high prevalence of delayed diagnosis. Its heterogeneous phenotypic presentation lead to differing considerations for early diagnostic identification. If initial symptomatology includes behavioral and cognitive disturbance, it is likely for such individuals to be referred first for neuropsychological testing before genetic testing. This case will expand upon diagnostic identification of 22q11DS. Method: A 12-year-old, 5-years educated, white female was seen for tele-neuropsychological evaluation due to COVID-19 restrictions in December 2020. Patient's mother reported concern regarding sudden and worsening behavioral changes including hallucinations, unusual affects, odd beliefs, academic decline, illegible handwriting, attention and memory issues, and behavioral problems in school to the point of removal. Results: Overall performance on the Meyers Neuropsychological Battery was severely impaired. See uploaded image file for specific test findings. Speech, affect, and behavior were notable during examination. Diagnoses included schizophrenia (provisional) and specific learning disorder with reading impairment (historical). Immediate neurology consultation was recommended. Later EEG, brain MRI, and CSF were unremarkable. Acute metabolic etiology was ruled out. Subsequent genetic testing revealed 22q11DS. Conclusions: Diagnostic identification of 22q11DS and resulting access to care management heavily depends on initial symptom presentation. In this specific case, the COVID-19 lockdown created barrier to sufficient services. This case expands upon knowledge of the cognitive profile of 22q11DS and calls upon increased awareness. Targeted improvement of neurocognition potentially protects against cognitive decline related to psychotic symptoms, and thus neuropsychologists play a vital role in referral to such resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction but adequately sized ventricles, the treatment of choice is biventricular repair. Several options have been proposed, including neonatal Yasui or Ross–Konno operation. However, each of these procedures carries a high mortality risk, especially in syndromic neonates. Here, we report the case of a patient with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and a diagnosis of interrupted aortic arch type B2, ventricular septal defect and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. As a means to avoid high-risk neonatal surgery in this patient, we pursued a strategy of delayed biventricular repair involving initial hybrid Norwood palliation followed by a Yasui-type operation at 3 months. Although this strategy turned out to be successful, proactive monitoring for the development of ductal stent stenosis during follow-up after the hybrid procedure remains crucial to prevent hemodynamic complications such as cardiac failure and systemic hypoperfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]