Search

We aimed to explore both the dietary-related behavior change techniques (BCTs) adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) described to enact themselves and the BCTs they perceived their dietitians to enact within consultations. Qualitative study involving semistructured telephone interviews with adults who consulted with a dietitian after their T2D diagnosis. Participants shared their experience of dietary behavior change and interactions with dietitians. Telephone-based interviews from an Australian university setting. Twenty-one adults (12 females and 9 males) aged 36–75 years were self-selected and invited by email. Dietary behavior changes reportedly enacted after a T2D diagnosis by participants and their dietitians. Transcripts were analyzed through thematic content analysis according to the BCT taxonomy. Participants described several BCTs such as problem-solving and self-monitoring (behavior), which helped their dietary behavior change. Participants perceived their dietitians to use BCTs, including goal setting (outcome), self-monitoring (behavior), and instruction on how to perform the behavior. These participants who had consulted with a dietitian reported additional techniques than those prescribed in the consultation process. Adults with T2D undertake a variety of BCTs to support dietary behavior change. Dietitians can draw on behavior change taxonomies to support behavior change in clients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gabapentinoid medications are increasingly being used in chronic pain management, yet very little is known about the experiences of those using them. The aim of this study was to address this gap in the literature by qualitatively exploring the lived experiences of patients using gabapentinoids for chronic pain. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 adults prescribed a gabapentinoid medication – either pregabalin or gabapentin – for chronic pain in Australia. Interviews were conducted in May 2022 via telephone or online video chat. Audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The Medication Adherence Model was used as a framework for synthesising the data and organising themes. For participants in this study, the initial decision to use gabapentinoids for chronic pain was driven by a level of desperation for pain relief, a perceived lack of pain management alternatives, and a belief that the medication was safer and easier to access than opioids. However, once using gabapentinoids, experiences varied considerably with some viewing the medication as effective and safe, and others viewing it as useless or harmful. Some participants expressed concern that they were not adequately informed by their prescribers about the risks of gabapentinoid use. These findings emphasise the importance of patient-provider communication and taking a patient-centred approach to gabapentinoid prescribing and de-prescribing. Future qualitative research in this area should involve primary care providers to gain a better understanding of factors driving increased gabapentinoid prescribing in chronic pain management as well as barriers to patient education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigates laughter by General Practitioners (GPs) in response to patient laughter in lifestyle behaviour consultations. We examined video-recorded consultations involving 44 patients of four GPs in Australia. After identifying 33 cases of patient laughter, we examined whether GPs laughed in response. We used Conversation Analysis to explore the appropriateness of GP laughter and non-laughter by investigating the talk before and after the occurrence of patient laughter. GP reciprocal laughter was found in thirteen occasions when patients unsolicitedly mentioned their behaviours, laughed and displayed their evaluative stances (whether the behaviours were positive or negative). On twenty occasions, patients laughed in response to GP enquiries, which worked to problematise particular behaviours. In this context, patient laughter was not usually reciprocated (19/20 cases) because reciprocal laughter may risk being interpreted as laughing at the patient, as evidenced by one deviant case. GP reciprocal laughter may be problematic when the behaviour issues are raised by GPs and patients' evaluative stances regarding their behaviour have not yet been revealed. To decide when it is appropriate to reciprocate laughter, GPs should consider the contexts that lead to patient laughter and patients' evaluative stances. • Conversation Analysis is a robust empirical research approach for investigating laughter in lifestyle behaviour consultations. • When patients do not indicate whether the behaviours are positive or negative, GPs' reciprocal laughter may have negative effect. • When patients make jokes about their behaviours, GPs' reciprocal laughter may work to build the patient-doctor relationship. • When the behaviour issue is raised by the patient, GP laughter is less likely to be interpreted as laughing at the patient. • When the issue is raised by the GP, GP laughter is more at risk of being interpreted as laughing at. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]