Search

The ratio of the meteoric cosmogenic nuclide 10 Be, precipitated from the atmosphere, to the stable nuclide 9 Be, released by silicate weathering, was measured in suspended sediment of the Ganga River basin to determine denudation rates, degrees of weathering, and sediment storage in the floodplain. The 10 Be precipitated and the 9 Be released are carried to ca. 90% by amorphous and to 10% by crystalline Fe-hydroxides, as revealed by chemical extractions, whereas the dissolved Be transport is negligible due to the river pH of 8. Resulting 10 Be/ 9 Be ratios increase from 0.75 × 10 − 9 for the northern and Himalaya-draining rivers to 1.7 × 10 − 9 in the downstream basin. The increase in 10 Be/ 9 Be ratios results from two compounding effects: with 1) average denudation rates decrease from 0.5 mm yr −1 in the Himalayas to 0.17 mm yr −1 for the Ganga main stem in the lowlands, 2) the southern tributaries draining the low-relief craton contribute sediment with a ratio of 2.0 × 10 − 9 , corresponding to a denudation rate of 0.03 mm yr −1 . We find that at the spatial scale of the entire basin, the atmospheric delivery flux of 10 Be equals its sedimentary export flux. Hence fluxes can be considered to be at steady state and radioactive decay of 10 Be during sediment storage is not discernible. The lack of a resolvable increase in 10 Be concentration during sediment transfer along the floodplain stretch furthermore suggests that the sediment transfer time is indeed short. We also cannot resolve any additional release of silicate-bound 9 Be there, testifying to the lower degree of weathering there. When multiplied with the basin area the 10 Be/ 9 Be-derived denudation rate of 0.14 mm yr −1 corresponds to a sediment flux of 350 Mt yr −1 which is in good agreement with gauging-derived sediment fluxes (ca. 400 Mt yr −1 ). Because they integrate over the entire basin, denudation rates from 10 Be/ 9 Be are lower than floodplain-corrected denudation rates from in situ cosmogenic 10 Be that reflect the rates of the sediment-producing mountain areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been proposed that at short timescales of 102–105 yr, climatic variability can explain variations in sediment flux, but in orogens with pronounced climatic gradients rate changes caused by the oscillating efficiency in rainfall, runoff, and/or sediment transport and deposition are still not well-constrained. To explore landscape responses under variable climatic forcing, we evaluate time windows of prevailing sediment aggradation and related paleo-erosion rates from the southern flanks of the Dhauladhar Range in the western Himalaya. We compare past and present 10Be-derived erosion rates of well-dated Late Pleistocene fluvial landforms and modern river sediments and reconstruct the sediment aggradation and incision history based on new luminescence data. Our results document significant variations in erosion rates ranging from 0.1 to 3.4 mm/yr over the Late Pleistocene. We find that, during times of weak monsoon intensity, the moderately steep areas (hillslope angles of 27 ± 13°) erode at lower rates of 0.1–0.4 mm/yr compared to steeper (>40°) crestal regions of the Dhauladhar Range that erode at 0.8−1.3 mm/yr. In contrast, during several millennia of stronger monsoon intensity, both the moderately steep and high slope areas record higher erosion rates (>1-3.4 mm/yr). Lithological clast-count analysis shows that this increase of erosion is focused in the moderately steep areas, where Lesser Himalayan rocks are exposed. Our data thus highlight the highly non-linear response of climatic forcing on landscape evolution and suggest complex depositional processes and sedimentary signals in downstream areas. • Paleo-erosion rates in the Himalaya are modulated by climate forcing. • Erosion rates are higher during episodes of strong monsoon. • Topographic response to climate change is non-linear. • Rapid erosion during short-lived strong monsoon phases result in valley aggradation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide concentrations in fluvial deposits allow estimation of paleo-erosion rates and reconstruction of the response of landscapes to climatic perturbations. In partly ice-covered landscapes, however, incorporation of subglacially-derived sediments that were shielded by ice from cosmic can lead to erroneous erosion rate calculations. Here, we combine in situ -produced 10Be-derived erosion rates, based on sand and pebbles from a fluvial fill terrace and the modern riverbed in the upper Yamuna catchment, with numerical ice flow modelling to quantify this bias. New luminescence and surface exposure ages suggest that aggradation of the exposed deposits occurred between 29.9 ± 2.5 ka and 14.8 ± 2.8 ka. During most of the deposition, glaciers probably covered ∼19% of the catchment. 10Be concentrations of terrace sand samples differ from those of pebble samples. We obtained the lowest erosion rates from quartzite pebbles, which stem from low elevations, and the highest erosion rates from crystalline pebbles, which stem from high elevations in the Yamuna catchment. We explain these different erosion rates by differences in the steepness of the source areas, an effect that prevails throughout the entire aggradation period despite significant former ice-cover. Sand samples, which are thought to be derived from all elevation parts of the catchment, however show lower 10Be concentrations during the aggradation compared to present-day. We argue that this difference is due to a substantial subglacial origin of the sand during the aggradation period, and not necessarily related to enhanced erosion. We conclude that aggradation of the valley fill in the Yamuna catchment is most likely due to reduced discharge, and only marginally related to higher erosion rates during the late Pleistocene. • Paleo-erosion rates from a ∼135-m high river terrace in the Yamuna catchment. • New luminescence and surface exposure ages from the river terrace. • Aggradation occurred during marine isotope stage 2, when discharge was reduced. • Lower 10Be] in terrace sand compared to river sand can be explained by ice cover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]