Search

Turing (1937) introduces a model of code that is followed by other pioneers of computing machines (such as Flowers 1983, Eckert, Mauchly, Brainerd 1945 and others). One of them is John von Neumann, who defines the concept of optimal code in the context of the conception of EDVAC. He later uses it to build on in his theoretical considerations of the universal constructor (von Neumann 1966). Von Neumann (1963) further presents one of the first neural network models, in relation to the work of McCulloch and Pitts (1943), for both theoretical purposes (von Neumann probe) and practical applications (computer architecture of EDVAC). The aim of this paper is (1) to describe the differences between Turingʼs and von Neumannʼs conceptualizations of code and the mechanical computing model. Between von Neumann's abstract technical conception (von Neumann 1963 and 1966) and Turingʼs more concrete biochemical conception (Turing 1952). Furthermore, (2) we want to answer the question why these influential models of mechanisms (predominantly in computer science) have so far been ignored by philosophers of the new mechanism (Machamer, Darden, Craver 2000, Glennan 2017). We will show that these classical models of machines are not only compatible with the new mechanism, but moreover complement it, since they represent a completely separate type of model of mechanism, alongside producing, maintaining and underlying (Zámečník 2021). The final (3) and main goal of our paper will be an attempt to relate von Neumannʼs and Turingʼs notion of mechanism to Barbieriʼs notion of extended mechanism (Barbieri 2015). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper proposes a technique, called Evolving Probabilistic Neural Network (), that presents many interesting features, including incremental learning, evolving architecture, the capacity to learn continually throughout its existence and requiring that each training sample be used only once in the training phase without reprocessing. A series of experiments was performed on data sets in the public domain; the results indicate that is superior or equal to the other incremental neural networks evaluated in this paper. These results also demonstrate the advantage of the small architecture and show that its architecture is more stable than the other incremental neural networks evaluated. thus appears to be a promising alternative for a quick learning system and a fast classifier with a low computational cost. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In an earlier paper [Fukushima, K., & Tohyama, K. (2005). Analysis of optic flow: a neural network model. In ICONIP 2005, International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 312–317); Tohyama, K., & Fukushima, K. (2005). Neural network model for extracting 98 optic flow. Neural Networks, 18(5–6), 549–556], we proposed a neural network extracting optic flow based on vector field hypothesis. We started discussion there, however, from the stage where local velocities of visual objects have already been extracted. This paper proposes a new mechanism of extracting local velocity from retinal images, and adds it to the previous network. The network has a hierarchical multilayered architecture. X- and Y-cells of the retina extract spatial and temporal contrast of brightness. The network contains several types of V1 cells, namely, S- C- and V-cells. S- and C-cells extract orientated edges. V-cells extract local velocities, based on the signals from Y- and S-cells. MT cells extract relative velocities between adjoining small visual fields. MST cells add the responses of MT cells to extract a specific optic flow, such as rotation and expansion/contraction. The difference in type of optic flow extracted by MST cells can be created simply by the difference in relative locations of inhibitory to excitatory areas in the receptive fields of MT cells. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The temporal character of the input is, generally, not taken into account in the neural models. This paper presents an extension of the FasArt model focused on the treatment of temporal signals. FasArt model is proposed as an integration of the characteristic elements of the Fuzzy System Theory in an ART architecture. A duality between the activation concept and membership function is established. FasArt maintains the structure of the Fuzzy ARTMAP architecture, implying a static character since the dynamic response of the input is not considered. The proposed novel model, dynamic FasArt (dFasArt), uses dynamic equations for the processing stages of FasArt: activation, matching and learning. The new formulation of dFasArt includes time as another characteristic of the input. This allows the activation of the units to have a history-dependent character instead of being only a function of the last input value. Therefore, dFasArt model is robust to spurious values and noisy inputs. As experimental work, some cases have been used to check the robustness of dFasArt. A possible application has been proposed for the detection of variations in the system dynamics. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper presents architectures for comparator trees capable of finding the minimum value of a large number of inputs. Such circuits are of general applicability although the intended application for which the circuits were designed is the winner-take-all function of a digital implementation of a neural network based on the self organising map. Mechanisms for reducing delay based on look-ahead logic within individual comparators and mechanisms based on multiplexor architectures of a comparator are compared for both propagation delay and area. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]