Search

Winter wheat–summer maize cropping system in the North China Plain often experiences droughtinduced yield reduction in the wheat season and rainwater and nitrogen (N) fertilizer losses in the maize season. This study aimed to identify an optimal interseasonal water- and N-management strategy to alleviate these losses. Four ratios of allocation of 360 kg N ha-1 between the wheat and maize seasons under one-time presowing root-zone irrigation (W0) and additional jointing and anthesis irrigation (W2) in wheat and one irrigation after maize sowing were set as follows: N1 (120:240), N2 (180:180), N3 (240:120) and N4 (300:60). The results showed that under W0, the N3 treatment produced the highest annual yield, crop water productivity (WPC), and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN). Increased N allocation in wheat under W0 improved wheat yield without affecting maize yield, as surplus nitrate after wheat harvest was retained in the topsoil layers and available for the subsequent maize. Under W2, annual yield was largest in the N2 treatment. The risk of nitrate leaching increased in W2 when N application rate in wheat exceeded that of the N2 treatment, especially in the wet year. Compared to W2N2, the W0N3 maintained 95.2% grain yield over two years. The WPC was higher in the W0 treatment than in the W2 treatment. Therefore, following limited total N rate, an appropriate fertilizer N transfer from maize to wheat season had the potential of a ‘‘triple win” for high annual yield, WPC and PFPN in a water-limited wheat–maize cropping system [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil CO 2 emissions respond differently to different tillage practices. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) on soil CO 2 emissions and the primary controlling factors or processes. The goal of this study is to derive the relationship of soil CO 2 emissions with soil physicochemical properties from differently tilled soils in a typical winter wheat summer maize rotation system. We hypothesized that soil tillage practices would impact the soil carbon cycle by modifying soil physical and chemical properties, which would in turn affect the soil CO 2 emissions. The study was conducted from 2018 to 2022 with two tillage practices using a randomized complete block design with three replicates. A leading international real-time monitoring system in situ was used to collect soil CO 2 emission data. Cumulative soil CO 2 emissions were reduced by 28.7% in maize and increased by 9.0% in wheat under NT as compared to CT. On an annual scale, the cumulative CO 2 emissions were decreased by 20.5% in NT as compared to CT. Maize season accounted for 70% 78% of soil CO 2 emissions. NT improved the aboveground biomass by 7.74% and 6.44%, and grain yields by 10.2% and 4.49% for maize and wheat, respectively. The soil CO 2 emission intensity of maize was reduced by 35.9% under NT as compared to CT. No significant differences were discovered under the two tillage practices for soil CO 2 emission intensity of wheat. For maize, NT increased the bulk density, subsequently decreasing soil temperature and increasing soil moisture. NT also led to higher soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content, ultimately resulting in a significant reduction in soil CO 2 emissions. For wheat, NT increased soil bulk density, further increasing soil moisture and lowering soil pH. NT thus resulted in lower soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content, ultimately leading to enhanced soil CO 2 emissions. Some of these observations might not be consistent with theoretical predictions, which indicated that the unconsidered factors of actual field conditions might have much significant effects. Overall, NT can be extensively used as an eco-friendly cropland tillage practice based on its positive effects of reducing CO 2 emissions and increasing crop yields. [Display omitted] • CO 2 emission variations by tillage were evaluated by the structural equation model. • No-tillage (NT) decreased CO 2 emissions by 28.7% in maize and increased by 8.99% in wheat. • Annual CO 2 emissions were decreased by 20.5% under NT than conventional tillage (CT). • Maize season accounted for 70% 78% of soil CO 2 emissions. • CO 2 emission intensity of maize was reduced by 35.9% under NT compared with CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to identify whether nitrogen (N) use efficiency in a summer-maize/winter-wheat double-cropping system of the North China Plain (NCP) could be increased by adjusting N supply to crop N demand, and through the use of alternate N fertilizers and application strategies. In a static experiment conducted on a farmers’ field six reduced N treatments were compared to farmers’ practice (FP: 550 kg (N) ha −1 a −1 ) and a control treatment (CK). With few exceptions of single treatments in single cropping-seasons, the optimized fertilization of N did not lead to a yield reduction of either summer-maize or winter-wheat. The grain yield of summer-maize ranged between 5.8 and 7.1 Mg ha −1 . The grain yield of wheat ranged between 4.4 and 6.2 Mg ha −1 . For the first two vegetation periods of summer-maize, the recovery efficiency (RE N : 0.09–0.30 kg kg −1 ) and agronomic efficiency of N (AE N ) were mainly affected by the yield achieved in the control treatment (5.7 and 5.9 Mg ha −1 ), which was not significantly reduced compared to most fertilized treatments. In the third vegetation period of summer-maize, an increase of RE N of the reduced treatments (0.37–0.58 kg kg −1 ) was determined compared to FP (0.21 kg kg −1 ). In both vegetation periods of wheat RE N of the reduced treatments (0.34–1.0 kg kg −1 ) was significantly higher compared to FP (0.26 and 0.27 kg kg −1 ). The highest cumulated AE N , as well as cumulated grain yields were observed when ammonium sulphate nitrate + 3,4-dimethylpyrazolephosphate (ASN DMPP ) was applied according to crop N demand and residual soil mineral N. The highest RE N was observed when urea ammonium nitrate was applied in a shallow, banded depot (UAN DEP ). This research demonstrates that N application rates in a maize/wheat double cropping system may be significantly reduced compared to common farmers’ practice, without negatively affecting grain yield, thereby increasing N use efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Adjusting fertilization to the crop requirements reduces the N balance in a farmer's field. [•] N mineralized in spring is only utilized by the following summer-crop. [•] N application above crop requirements increases the amount of cycling N and apparent N loss. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Wheat–maize double cropping is the most important cropping system on the Hebei Plain and is one of the most important cropping systems in China. In a scenario of greater food demand, and increasing water and rural labour scarcity, it is critical that the annual productivity of the system is improved in water-energy-cost efficient and low carbon ways. Based on farm surveys, this paper benchmarked the performance of wheat–maize double crops on the Hebei Plain during the 2004–2005 season. These farm yields were assessed both against experimental yields collected from on-farm maximum yield trials conducted during the same 2004–2005 season and relative to simulated estimates of the climate-driven potential productivity of the region. The survey of 362 farms in six counties of the Hebei Plain during the 2004–2005 season found wheat yields ranging from 3375kgha−1 to 9000kgha−1 with an overall average yield of 6556kgha−1. Maize yields averaged 7549kgha−1 and ranged from 3375kgha−1 to 11,250kgha−1. The aggregate production for the wheat–maize double crops grown in the 2004–2005 season averaged 14,105kgha−1 across the six counties. This was 72% of the average production (19,586kgha−1) recorded from on-farm trials conducted in each of the six counties and 60% of the simulated average production potential (24,147kgha−1) for the Hebei Plain in the 2004–2005 season. Thus, the annual productivity of the current cropping system could be increased with currently available technologies by 28%, while a yield increase of 42% is possible if farm yields approach the simulated yield potential. Based on farmer interviews and field observations, a number of real and perceived reasons for the current yield gaps in farmers’ fields were recognised. For instance, irrigation at stem-elongation of wheat is a current recommendation, yet only a proportion of the surveyed farmers were able to follow this strategy due to lack of access to shared irrigation facilities. Improving the region''s infrastructure to enable more timely irrigation of crops will be a necessary prerequisite to improved productivity. The results from the farm surveys and on-farm trials indicate that, with current recommended practices, farmers can improve their annual farm productivity and close the current yield gaps. However, the survey identified that increasing system performance and efficiency will require a focus on both agronomic and socio-economic issues. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The objective of this study was to evaluate plant-available N pools and the role of N management index (NMI) in the surface (0-20 cm) of a fluvo-aquic soil after 18 years of fertilization treatments under a wheat-maize cropping system in the North China Plain. The experiment included seven treatments: (1) NPK, balanced application of chemical fertilizer NPK; (2) OM, application of organic manure; (3) 1/2OMN, application of half organic manure plus chemical fertilizer NPK; (4) NP, application of chemical fertilizer NP; (5) PK, application of chemical fertilizer PK; (6) NK, application of chemical fertilizer NK; and (7) CK, unfertilized control. Total organic N (TON), microbial biomass N (MBN), labile N (LN), inorganic N (ION, including ammonium (NH)-N and nitrate (NO)-N) contents, net ammonification rate (NAR), net nitrification rate (NNR), net N mineralization rate (NNMR), and NMI in the fertilized treatments were higher than in the unfertilized treatment. Application of chemical fertilizer N (NPK, NP, and NK) increased ION in soils, compared with application of organic N or control. Nitrate N prevailed over exchangeable NH-N in all treatments. Nitrogen storage of the OM- and 1/2OMN-treated soils increased by 50.0% and 24.3%, respectively, over the NPK-treated soil, which had 5.4-22.5% more N than NP-, PK-, and NK-treated soils. The MBN, LN, and ION accounted for 1.7-2.4%, 25.7-34.2%, and 1.4-2.9% of TON, respectively, in different fertilization treatments. The surface soils (0-20-cm layer) in all treatments mineralized 43.6-152.9 kg N ha year for crop growth. Microbial biomass N was probably the better predictor of N mineralization, as it was correlated significantly ( P < 0.01) with NNMR. The OM and 1/2OMN treatments were not an optimal option for farmers when the crop yield and labor cost were taken into consideration but an optimal option for increasing soil N supply capacity and N sequestration in soil. The NPK treatment showed the highest crop yields and increased soil N fractions through crop residues and exudates input, and thus, it may be considered as a sustainable system in the North China Plain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]