Search

Purpose or objective: Oligoprogression (OPD) is defined as a condition where limited progression (1-3 metastases) is observed in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment. Local treatment of OPD might delay systemic therapy line switch, which could be beneficial in patients experiencing prolonged global disease control with novel targeted or immune therapies. In this study we investigated the impact on outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with OPD from metastatic lung cancer. Materials and methods: Data from a cohort of consecutive patients treated with Cyberknife and Linacbased SBRT between June 2015 and August 2021 were collected. All extracranial metastatic sites of OPD from lung cancer were included. Dose regimens consisted of 24 in 2 fractions, 30-51 Gy in 3 fractions, 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions, 52.5 Gy in 7 fractions and 44-56 Gy in 8 fractions. Dose was expressed as Biological Effective Dose for α/β=10 (BED10). Kaplan-Meyer method was used to calculate Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC) and Disease Progression-free Survival (DPFS) from the start date of SBRT to event. Results: Sixty-three patients, 34 female and 29 male were included. Median age was 75 years (range 25–83). All patients received concurrent systemic treatment before the start of the SBRT: 19 chemotherapy (CT) alone (30%), 26 CT plus immunotherapy (IT) or plus Tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) (41%) and 18 IT/TKI alone (29%). SBRT was delivered to lung (n=29), mediastinal node (n=9), bone (n=7), adrenal gland (n=19), other visceral metastases (1) and other node metastases (n=4). A median BED10 of 104 (range 39-151) Gy10 was delivered. After a median follow up of 20 months (range 1-48), median overall survival was median OS was 23 months (figure 1). LC was 93% at 1 year and 87% at 2 years. DPFS was 7 months. At univariate analysis, age, type of systemic treatment, metastatic site receiving SBRT and BED were not significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusion: SBRT in lung cancer patients for oligoprogression resulted in a long median OS of 23 months. One-year LC was 93%. Median DPFS was 7 months, translating into continuation of effective systemic treatment as other metastases grow slowly. SBRT could be useful to postpone the change of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. More research is needed to select OPD patients eligible for SBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose or objective: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is widely used for treatment of uncomplicated spine metastases to palliate symptoms and prolong disease control. However, criteria for patient selection are not available. The aim of this study is to identify determinants of local failure and progression-free interval in patients treated with SBRT to spinal metastases. Materials and methods: Data from consecutive patients treated with Cyberknife-based spine SBRT between January 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively collected. Dose was expressed as Biological Effective Dose for α/β=10 (BED10). Kaplan-Meyer method was used to calculate Local Control (LC) and Disease Free Survival (DFS) from date of SBRT to event. Univariate (UVA) and Multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed using log-rank and Cox model, respectively. Results: Sixty-two patients accounting for 70 spinal metastases were included. Median age was 66 (range 32- 87) years. Disease was metastatic at diagnosis in 21 patients (34%) : an active primary tumor was present in 17 patients (27%). Among treated sites, most represented primary malignancies were prostate (n=28, 40%) and breast (n=21, 30%). Dose regimens consisted of 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions and 21-30 Gy in 3 fractions in respectively 61 (87%) and 9 (13%) cases, resulting in a median BED of 43.2 (range 37.5-60) Gy10. Concurrent chemotherapy (including cytotoxic or targeted agents) was administered in 43% of cases (n=30). After a median follow up of 10 months (range 1-24 months), 9 local relapses and 40 distant progressions were observed. One year LC was 87% (Fig.1): nonprostate primary tumor (p=0.003, Fig.2) and concurrent chemotherapy (p=0.006, Fig.3) were associated to poorer LC at UVA, and an independent correlation was confirmed at MVA (respectively p=0.017 and p=0.024). One-year DFS was 43% (Fig.4). UVA showed a correlation between impaired DFS and active primary tumor (p=0.003), metastatic dissemination at diagnosis (p=0.02) and nonprostate primary tumor (p=0.009), although only an active primary tumor site was independently associated to DFS at MVA (p=0.007, Fig.5). Only G2 acute pain or nausea were observed. No late toxicity, in particular vertebral fracture, was reported. Conclusion: Spine SBRT results in high LC rates and durable progression-free survival with low incidence of mild toxicity. Clinical nomograms based on patient-related characteristics may help to select candidates for this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]