Search

• An innovative slim decentralised plug-and-play tank is proposed for DHW production. • Model calibration is performed by experimental data in charge/discharge process. • Retrofit solution cuts required annual energy in half of which 82% is RES quota. • Optimised charging scheme reduces the total annual electrical energy by 5.2 %. • A degree increment in draw-off temperature increases annual CO 2 emission by 103 kg. The present study deals with a multi-objective analysis of an innovative decentralised system to produce and store domestic hot water (DHW), emphasising on the combined effects of the technological aspect, control strategy and user's behaviour. The proposed system, by relying on thermal energy storage, decouples energy production and demand while shaves peaks in the energy demand and, at the same time, provides more autonomy to users through local storages. To identify subtle interactions in components of DHW system, dynamic simulations are carried out by establishing a coupled TRNSYS-MATLAB code, calibrated and validated by experimental measurements. The energy analysis implies that the proposed system cuts the required annual electrical energy in half, of which up to 82% of needed primary energy is supplied from renewable sources, compared to previous electrical-decentralised system. The optimisation of the results through applying control strategies indicates that adopting a three-time charging scheme is advantageous in terms of providing a more stable temperature profile as well as a higher hot water temperature. Compared to an available-by-demand operation, this scheme reduces the required total annual electricity by 5.2 % and enhances total thermal loss from components up to 4.0%. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis on the results emphasises the striking role of the user behaviour in electrical energy consumption either via draw-off temperature or adjusting the pre-defined temperature for activation of the built-in auxiliary heater. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• European-scalable method to simulate rainfall erosivity from gridded rainfall data. • Monthly power-law models link rainfall depth to erosivity with European coverage. • EMO-5 shows the best potential to simulate rainfall erosivity events. • Gridded datasets perform better in Northern over Southern Europe. • Future upscaling and regional bias correction may overcome current limitations. Soil erosion is time compressed into a number of episodic erosive rainfall events with an associated potential to detach and transport soil particles (rainfall erosivity), each possessing unique spatial and temporal characteristics. Rainfall erosivity events in Europe follow extreme value distributions in which a limited number of rainstorms dominate the long-term budget of available erosive energy. To combat soil erosion in Europe in a targeted manor, timely erosion mitigation measures should derive from dynamic model simulations that incorporate spatially and temporally distributed estimations of rainfall erosivity. Rain gauge measurements from singular points are typically used to quantify rainfall erosivity, however the spatial uniqueness of rainfall presents a key limitation to dynamically model rainfall across broad spatial scales with a limited number of point measurements. Discretised gridded precipitation datasets with a widespread (e.g. continental) spatial coverage potentially offer an opportunity to adequately replicate the dynamics of rainfall erosivity events, however their performance remains poorly tested in the pan-European context. This study builds upon the comprehensive Rainfall Erosivity Database at European Scale (REDES) archive of over 300,000 events from 1181 gauge stations to develop a two-step modelling process: 1) firstly, optimal monthly models were fitted and evaluated between gauge-recorded rainfall depth and rainfall erosivity (EI 30) across European climatic regions to develop a European-scale parameter surface, 2) secondly, three datasets (EMO-5 (6-hr), E-OBS (24-hr), UERRA MESCAN-SURFEX (24hr)) were directly evaluated via a grid-to-point analysis based on their ability to simulate the station-specific event rainfall erosivity timeseries at a random selection of 32 locations. EMO-5 (Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency mean = 0.24) outperformed other tested gridded datasets, showing the capability to adequately replicate the event number, timing, and their average magnitude. A higher model performance in Northern compared with Southern European climatic regions, in which characteristically higher and spatially-complex event rainfall erosivity magnitudes are found, was symptomatic of a poor ability of grid-based simulations to replicate the magnitudes of events in the outer extents of the frequency-magnitude spectrum. The absence of a clear global systematic predictive bias amongst simulated locations suggests the need for future upscaling of this analysis to the entire European REDES dataset to fully understand and correct for the method-derived bias in a climate region-specific way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Existing approaches to EPCs in Europe reviewed. • Limitations to current and future applications highlighted. • New forms of modelling for future EPCs documented. • A framework of criteria for evaluating new assessment approaches proposed. As our need for energy information of buildings evolves, and the tools and methods at our disposal increase in scale and complexity, it is perhaps reasonable to expect a similar level of change in the way energy in buildings is assessed within national energy compliance frameworks. By comparing the available opportunities for building energy modelling with the current methodologies underlying Energy Performance Certificates, this study proposes future directions for standardised energy assessment of residential buildings and the impact this could have on different facets of energy policy. In carrying out this exercise, a number of criteria are proposed that could be used to appraise methodologies that align with future requirements of energy assessment, with two potential candidates for future energy assessment considered as part of this appraisal. An argument is thus proposed for better aligning future forms of standardised energy assessment with directions and requirements of future low-carbon energy policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]