Search

Lithium (Li)‐rich transition metal oxide cathodes with a cation disordered rock salt structure (DRX) are increasingly gaining popularity for advanced Li batteries as they offer high capacity and cost benefits over the commonly used layered Li transition metal oxide cathodes. However, the performance of DRX cathodes and their applications are limited by severe side reactions between the cathode and the state‐of‐the‐art carbonate‐based electrolytes at high voltage of 4.8 V, transition metal dissolution, and structural instability of the cathode particles. In this work, an advanced localized high‐concentration electrolyte (LHCE) is developed to form a stable cathode‐electrolyte interphase and mitigate structural instability of the Li1.13Mn0.66Ti0.21O2 (LMTO) DRX during electrochemical cycling. Li||LMTO half cells with the LHCE demonstrate increased capacity, cycling stability, and superior rate capability compared with cells containing a conventional carbonate electrolyte. For instance, the Li||LMTO cells cycled in LHCE show a higher initial capacity of 205.2 mAh g−1 and a better capacity retention of 72.5% after 200 cycles at a current density of 20 mA g−1 than those with the conventional electrolyte (initial capacity of 187.7 mAh g−1 and capacity retention of 19.9%). This work paves the way to the development of practical DRX cathode‐based high‐energy Li batteries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recharging battery‐powered electric vehicles (EVs) in a similar timeframe as those used for refueling gas‐powered internal combustion vehicles is highly desirable for rapid penetration of the EV market. It is well known that the electrolyte in a battery plays a critical role in fast‐charging capability of the battery because it determines the rate of ion transport together with its derived electrode/electrolyte interphases on both cathode and anode of the battery. In this study, the effects of contents of salt, coordinating solvent, and noncoordinating diluent on salt dissociation degree and electrolyte ionic conductivity are investigated, and a controlled solvation structure electrolyte is developed to improve the lithium ion mobility and conductivity in the electrolyte and to enhance the kinetics and stability of the electrode/electrolyte interphases in the battery. This electrolyte enables fast‐charging capability of high energy density lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) at up to 5 C rate (12‐min charging), which significantly outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art electrolyte. The controlled solvation structure sheds light on the future electrolyte design for fast‐charging LIBs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) based on five different types of solvents were systematically studied and compared in lithium (Li)‐ion batteries (LIBs). The unique solvation structure of LHCEs promotes the participation of Li salt in forming solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on graphite (Gr) anode, which enables solvents previously considered incompatible with Gr to achieve reversible lithiation/delithiation. However, the long cyclability of LIBs is still subject to the intrinsic properties of the solvent species in LHCEs. Such issue can be readily resolved by introducing a small amount of additive into LHCEs. The synergetic decompositions of Li salt, solvating solvent and additive yield effective SEIs and cathode electrolyte interphases (CEIs) in most of the studied LHCEs. This study reveals that both the structure and the composition of solvation sheaths in LHCEs have significant effect on SEI and CEI, and consequently, the cycle life of energetically dense LIBs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) based on five different types of solvents were systematically studied and compared in lithium (Li)‐ion batteries (LIBs). The unique solvation structure of LHCEs promotes the participation of Li salt in forming solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on graphite (Gr) anode, which enables solvents previously considered incompatible with Gr to achieve reversible lithiation/delithiation. However, the long cyclability of LIBs is still subject to the intrinsic properties of the solvent species in LHCEs. Such issue can be readily resolved by introducing a small amount of additive into LHCEs. The synergetic decompositions of Li salt, solvating solvent and additive yield effective SEIs and cathode electrolyte interphases (CEIs) in most of the studied LHCEs. This study reveals that both the structure and the composition of solvation sheaths in LHCEs have significant effect on SEI and CEI, and consequently, the cycle life of energetically dense LIBs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been widely assumed that the flammability of the liquid electrolyte is one of the most influential factors that determine the safety of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs). Following this consideration, a completely nonflammable electrolyte is designed and adopted for graphite||LiFePO4 (Gr||LFP) batteries. Contrary to the conventional understanding, the completely nonflammable electrolyte with phosphorus‐containing solvents exhibits inferior safety performance in commercial Gr||LFP batteries, in comparison to the flammable conventional LiPF6‐organocarbonate electrolyte. Mechanistic studies identify the exothermic reactions between the electrolyte (especially the salt LiFSI) and the charged electrodes as the "culprit" behind this counterintuitive phenomenon. The discovery emphasizes the importance of reducing the electrolyte reactivity when designing safe electrolytes, as well as the necessity of evaluating safety performance of electrolytes on a battery level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this work, localized high concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) based on tetramethylene sulfone (TMS) were designed. Similar to LHCEs based on other solvents, TMS-based LHCEs can achieve excellent compatibility with high energy density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) when combined with a proper additive. The unique solvation structure of LHCEs facilitates the synergetic decomposition of anion, solvent and additive in the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation. Proper combinations of the three constituents of the solvation sheaths in LHCEs can promote the formation of highly effective SEI on graphite negative electrode. The absence of LiPF 6 in LHCEs also suppresses the degradation of positive electrode materials in LIBs. The superior interphasial properties of LHCEs are the key to realizing the long lifespan of high energy density LIBs. • Tetramethylene sulfone (TMS) based LHCEs with different additives were studied. • Additive-free TMS-LHCE outperforms conventional electrolyte in Gr.||Ni-rich LIBs. • Proper additives in TMS-LHCE can further boost performance of Gr.||Ni-rich LIBs. • Electrolyte solvation structure/content govern interphase and battery performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]