Search

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a broad diagnosis unbound by aetiology and is based on a clinical examination demonstrating abnormalities of movement or posture. CP represents a static neurological condition, provided that neurodegenerative conditions, leukoencephalopathies and neuromuscular disorders are excluded. In paediatrics, the genetic conditions associated with CP are rapidly increasing, with primary and overlapping neurodevelopmental conditions perhaps better categorised by the predominant clinical feature such as CP, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder or epilepsy. Progress in molecular genetics may challenge what constitutes CP, but a genetic diagnosis does not negate the CP diagnosis. As clinicians working in the field, we discuss the changing tide of CP. Neuroimaging provides essential information through pattern recognition and demonstration of static brain changes. We present examples of children where a layered clinical diagnosis or dual aetiologies are appropriate. We also present examples of children with genetic causes of CP to highlight the challenges and limitations of neuroimaging to provide an aetiological diagnosis. In consultation with a geneticist, access to genomic testing (exome or genome sequencing) is now available in Australia under Medicare billing for children under the age of 10 with dysmorphic features, one or more major structural organ anomalies, (an evolving) intellectual disability or global developmental delay. We encourage the uptake of genomic testing in CP, because it can be difficult to tell whether a child has an environmental or genetic cause for CP. A specific genetic diagnosis may change patient management, reduce guilt and enable more distinctive research in the future to assist with understanding disease mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In paediatric migraine, ibuprofen, acetaminophen and triptans are safe, effective therapies but there is scant paediatric data informing second‐line emergency treatment. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with migraine at a tertiary children's hospital ED. Results: There were 207 children with migraine over a 1 year period. 46% received simple oral analgesia. 25% intravenous chlorpromazine, of whom 45% received further analgesia. Conclusions: While intravenous chlorpromazine as second‐line agent was mostly safe, it had unclear efficacy given the requirement for further treatment and hospital admissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]