Search

Summary: Stomatal optimization models can improve estimates of water and carbon fluxes with relatively low complexity, yet there is no consensus on which formulations are most appropriate for ecosystem‐scale applications. We implemented three existing analytical equations for stomatal conductance, based on different water penalty functions, in a big‐leaf comparison framework, and determined which optimization principles were most consistent with flux tower observations from different biomes.We used information theory to dissect controls of soil water supply and atmospheric demand on evapotranspiration in wet to dry conditions and to quantify missing or inadequate information in model variants. We ranked stomatal optimization principles based on parameter uncertainty, parsimony, predictive accuracy, and functional accuracy of the interactions between soil moisture, vapor pressure deficit, and evapotranspiration.Performance was high for all model variants. Water penalty functions with explicit representation of plant hydraulics did not substantially improve predictive or functional accuracy of ecosystem‐scale evapotranspiration estimates, and parameterizations were more uncertain, despite having physiological underpinnings at the plant level.Stomatal optimization based on water use efficiency thus provided more information about ecosystem‐scale evapotranspiration compared to those based on xylem vulnerability and proved more useful in improving ecosystem‐scale models with less complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We analyzed daily air temperature and soil moisture time series of 54 forest sites. • Moister soils supported cooler understory microclimates. • Temperature buffering was more sensitive to soil moisture in dry soils and on sunny slopes. • Forests can lose their temperature buffering function when soils become drier. Forest canopies can buffer the understory against temperature extremes, often creating cooler microclimates during warm summer days compared to temperatures outside the forest. The buffering of maximum temperatures in the understory results from a combination of canopy shading and air cooling through soil water evaporation and plant transpiration. Therefore, buffering capacity of forests depends on canopy cover and soil moisture content, which are increasingly affected by more frequent and severe canopy disturbances and soil droughts. The extent to which this buffering will be maintained in future conditions is unclear due to the lack of understanding about the relationship between soil moisture and air temperature buffering in interaction with canopy cover and topographic settings. We explored how soil moisture variability affects temperature offsets between outside and inside the forest on a daily basis, using temperature and soil moisture data from 54 sites in temperate broadleaf forests in Central Europe over four climatically different summer seasons. Daily maximum temperatures in forest understories were on average 2 °C cooler than outside temperatures. The buffering of understory temperatures was more effective when soil moisture was higher, and the offsets were more sensitive to soil moisture on sites with drier soils and on sun-exposed slopes with high topographic heat load. Based on these results, the soil–water limitation to forest temperature buffering will become more prevalent under future warmer conditions and will likely lead to changes in understory communities. Thus, our results highlight the urgent need to include soil moisture in models and predictions of forest microclimate, understory biodiversity and tree regeneration, to provide a more precise estimate of the effects of climate change. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]