Search

This study analyzes rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure. The crash potential index (CPI) was modified to reflect driver’s reaction time and estimated by types of lead and following vehicles (car or heavy vehicle). CPIs were estimated using the individual vehicle trajectory data from a segment of the US-101 freeway in Los Angeles, U.S.A. It was found that the CPI was generally higher for the following heavy vehicle than the following car due to heavy vehicle’s lower braking capability. This study also validates the CPI using the simulated traffic data which replicate the observed traffic conditions a few minutes before the crash time upstream and downstream of the crash locations. The observed data were obtained from crash records and loop detectors on a section of the Gardiner Expressway in Toronto, Canada. The result shows that the values of CPI were consistently higher during the traffic conditions immediately before the crash time (crash case) than the normal traffic conditions (non-crash case). This demonstrates that the CPI can be used to capture rear-end collision risk during car-following maneuver on freeways. The result also shows that rear-end collision risk is lower for heavy vehicles than cars in the crash case due to their shorter reaction time and lower speed when spacing is shorter. Thus, it is important to reflect the differences in driver behavior and vehicle performance characteristics between cars and heavy vehicles in estimating surrogate safety measures. Lastly, it was found that the CPI-based crash prediction model can correctly identify the crash and non-crash cases at higher accuracy than the other crash prediction models based on detectors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microscopic traffic simulation models require the calibration of car-following (or vehicle-following) models. The parameters of vehicle-following models control individual driver’s spacing, time gap, speed variation and acceleration during different driving conditions. In recent studies, these parameters have been determined for different vehicle classes separately since heavy vehicles generally keep longer spacing and time gap than light vehicles. These parameters have been commonly estimated based on the observed macroscopic traffic flow data such as average volume and speed. However, these data cannot reflect actual vehicle-following behavior of individual vehicles. Also, the effect of the lead vehicle class on the following vehicle’s behavior has been neglected in the parameter estimation. Thus, this study estimates the driving behavior parameters for cars and heavy vehicles in the Wiedemann 99 vehicle-following model. For the estimation, 2169 vehicle trajectories were obtained from a 640-m segment of US-101 in Los Angeles, California during the morning peak hours. Separate parameters were estimated for three vehicle classes (cars, heavy vehicles, and motorcycles) and three vehicle-following cases (car following car, car following heavy vehicle, and heavy vehicle following car). From the comparison of the driving behavior parameters between cars and heavy vehicles, it was found that heavy vehicles keep longer spacing and time gap with the lead vehicle, are less sensitive to the lead car behavior, and apply smaller acceleration when they start from stationary position compared to cars. It was also found that the parameters significantly varied across different vehicle pairs even for the same vehicle class and the same vehicle-following case. The estimated parameters were also validated as the VISSIM simulation with the estimated parameters better reflected the observed cumulative average speed and acceleration distributions than the simulation with the default parameters. The results indicate that differences in the parameters among different vehicle-following cases and the variability of parameters for different vehicle pairs must be considered in the fixed parameters for each vehicle class currently used in the Wiedemann’s model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes driver's injury severity in single- and two-vehicle crashes and compares the effects of explanatory variables among various types of crashes. The study identified factors affecting injury severity and their effects on severity levels using 5-year crash records for provincial highways in Ontario, Canada. Considering heteroscedasticity in the effects of explanatory variables on injury severity, the heteroscedastic ordered logit (HOL) models were developed for single- and two-vehicle crashes separately. The results of the models show that there exists heteroscedasticity for young drivers (≤30), safety equipment and ejection in the single-vehicle crash model, and female drivers, safety equipment and head-on collision in the two-vehicle crash models. The results also show that young car drivers have opposite effects between single-car and car-car crashes, and sideswipe crashes have opposite effects between car-car and truck-truck crashes. The study demonstrates that separate HOL models for single-vehicle and different types of two-vehicle crashes can identify differential effects of factors on driver's injury severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]