1. Ruolo della doxofillina rispetto alla teofillina nel paziente asmatico: risultati dello studio DOROTHEO 1.
- Author
-
Rogliani, Paola, Calzetta, Luigino, Ora, Josuel, Puxeddu, Ermanno, Laitano, Rossella, Matera, Maria Gabriella, and Cazzola, Mario
- Abstract
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate the impact of DOxofylline compaRed tO THEOphylline (DOROTHEO 1 study) on functional and clinical outcomes in asthma. Patients with asthma ≥ 16 years of age (with Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second [FEV1] ≥ 50% and < 80% and with ≥ 15% post-bronchodilator increase in FEV1) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive doxofylline 200 mg, doxofylline 400 mg, theophylline 250 mg, or placebo. All double-blind treatments were taken orally with immediate release formulations and three times daily for 12 weeks. Data evaluating the effect of doxofylline 400 mg, theophylline 250 mg and placebo on peak FEV1, asthma events rate, use of salbutamol as rescue medication and Adverse Events (AEs) were investigated. The analysis of 263 patients demonstrated that both doxofylline 400 mg and theophylline 250 mg significantly increased peak FEV1, reduced the rate of asthma events and use of salbutamol to relieve asthma symptoms compared to placebo (p < 0.05). No significant differences were detected between doxofylline 400 mg and theophylline 250 mg. Doxofylline 400 mg did not significantly (p > 0.05) increase the risk of AEs compared to placebo, conversely in patients treated with theophylline 250 mg the risk of AEs was significantly (p < 0.05) greater than in those that received placebo. The analysis on doxophylline 200 mg is ongoing for non-inferiority vs. theophylline 250 mg, and will be reported in a further publication. Doxofylline offers a promising alternative to theophylline with similar efficacy and superior safety profile in the management of patients with asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019