Search

Electrochemotherapy is now in routine clinical use to treat cutaneous metastases of any histology, and is listed in national and international guidelines for cutaneous metastases and primary skin cancer. Electrochemotherapy is used by dermatologists, surgeons, and oncologists, and for different degrees and manifestations of metastases to skin and primary skin tumours not amenable to surgery. This treatment utilises electric pulses to permeabilize cell membranes in tumours, thus allowing a dramatic increase of the cytotoxicity of anti-cancer agents. Response rates, often after only one treatment, are very high across all tumour types. The most frequent indications are cutaneous metastases from malignant melanoma and breast cancer. In 2006, standard operating procedures (SOPs) were written for this novel technology, greatly facilitating introduction and dissemination of the therapy. Since then considerable experience has been obtained treating a wider range of tumour histologies and increasing size of tumours which was not originally thought possible. A pan-European expert panel drawn from a range of disciplines from dermatology, general surgery, head and neck surgery, plastic surgery, and oncology met to form a consensus opinion to update the SOPs based on the experience obtained. This paper contains these updated recommendations for indications for electrochemotherapy, pretreatment information and evaluation, treatment choices, as well as follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the advent of multimodality therapy, the overall five-year survival rate from childhood cancer has improved considerably now exceeding 80% in developed European countries. This growing cohort of survivors, with many years of life ahead of them, has raised the necessity for knowledge concerning the risks of adverse long-term sequelae of the life-saving treatments in order to provide optimal screening and care and to identify and provide adequate interventions. Childhood cancer survivor cohorts in Europe. Considerable advantages exist to study late effects in individuals treated for childhood cancer in a European context, including the complementary advantages of large population-based cancer registries and the unrivalled opportunities to study lifetime risks, together with rich and detailed hospital-based cohorts which fill many of the gaps left by the large-scale population-based studies, such as sparse treatment information. Several large national cohorts have been established within Europe to study late effects in individuals treated for childhood cancer including the Nordic Adult Life after Childhood Cancer in Scandinavia study (ALiCCS), the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (BCCSS), the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG) LATER study, and the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS). Furthermore, there are other large cohorts, which may eventually become national in scope including the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (FCCSS), the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study for Leukaemia (LEA), and the Italian Study on off-therapy Childhood Cancer Survivors (OTR). In recent years significant steps have been taken to extend these national studies into a larger pan-European context through the establishment of two large consortia - PanCareSurFup and PanCareLIFE. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the current large, national and pan-European studies of late effects after childhood cancer. This overview will highlight the strong cooperation across Europe, in particular the EU-funded collaborative research projects PanCareSurFup and PanCareLIFE. Overall goal. The overall goal of these large cohort studies is to provide every European childhood cancer survivor with better care and better long-term health so that they reach their full potential, and to the degree possible, enjoy the same quality of life and opportunities as their peers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. From March 1994 to March 1998, breast cancer patients (an estimated relapse risk with 70% or more within five years with standard therapy) were randomised to treatment with tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) therapy or FEC followed by marrow-supported high dose therapy in the Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study. The aim of the present paper was to investigate differences in toxicity and eight health-related quality of life (HRQoL) variables (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, nausea-vomiting, and global quality of life) between women in the six dose steps used in the tailored and granulocyte colony stimulating factor supported FEC-arm at the assessment point 16 weeks after random assignment to treatment. Methods. The European Organization and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 were mailed to the patients. Results. A total of 157 (87%) in the tailored FEC-group responded to the questionnaire within the time frame 16 weeks after inclusion in the study. Overall, toxicity was low, reaching grade 1--2 also in the higher dose steps. There were no overall differences between the dose steps on any of the tested HRQoL variables. Patients at dose step 4 scored statistically significantly higher on physical functioning than patients at dose step 1 (p == 0.022) and compared to those at dose step 2 (p == 0.014). Patients at dose steps −−2 and −−1 (combined to one group) reported statistically significantly higher mean scores on cognitive functioning than patients at dose step 1 (p == 0.022). Conclusion. Patients who received higher doses, based on the tailored dosing strategy, did not seem to have worse HRQoL than those who had lower doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The First Nordic Conference on Chemoresistance in Cancer Treatment was held in the Danish town of Helsingør on October 9th and 10th, 1997, under the auspices of the Nordic Cancer Chemoresistance Group (NCCG). The meeting focused on biochemical chemoresistance in a multidisciplinary approach. There were 19 oral and 15 poster presentations documenting recent advances in experimental and clinical research of drug transport mechanisms, DNA repair systems, detoxifying enzymes, drug target regulation, in vitro sensitivity tests, apoptosis inhibition, and strategies to circumvent chemoresistance. In the present paper we review the main issues that were addressed and discuss the findings with reference to the current literature in the field. The meeting demonstrated the plurality and the complexity of chemoresistance, which is a major obstacle to successful chemotherapy in cancer patients. The new insights to mechanisms of drug resistance and sensitization represent a useful basis for further development of strategies to circumvent chemoresistance in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]