Search

This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of algal-based membrane bioreactors (AMBRs) and their potential for removing hazardous and toxic contaminants from wastewater. Through an identification of contaminant types and sources, as well as an explanation of AMBR operating principles, this study sheds light on the promising capabilities of AMBRs in eliminating pollutants like nitrogen, phosphorus, and organic matter, while generating valuable biomass and energy. However, challenges and limitations, such as the need for process optimization and the risk of algal-bacterial imbalance, have been identified. To overcome these obstacles, strategies like mixed cultures and bioaugmentation techniques have been proposed. Furthermore, this study explores the wider applications of AMBRs beyond wastewater treatment, including the production of value-added products and the removal of emerging contaminants. The findings underscore the significance of factors such as appropriate algal-bacterial consortia selection, hydraulic and organic loading rate optimization, and environmental factor control for the success of AMBRs. A comprehensive understanding of these challenges and opportunities can pave the way for more efficient and effective wastewater treatment processes, which are crucial for safeguarding public health and the environment. [Display omitted] • Algal-based MBRs effectively remove hazardous contaminants. • Challenges remain in biomass accumulation, nutrient limitation, and toxicity. • Mitigation strategies include system optimization and use of renewable energy. • Potential applications beyond wastewater treatment include biofuel and bioproduct production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The utilization of microalgae in treating wastewater has been an emerging topic focussed on finding an economically sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to treating wastewater. Over the last several years, different types of con microalgae and bacteria consortia have been experimented with to explore their potential in effectively treating wastewater from different sources. The basic features considered while determining efficiency is their capacity to remove nutrients including nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and heavy metals like arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and copper (Cu). This paper reviews the efficiency of microalgae as an approach to treating wastewater from different sources and compares conventional and microalgae-based treatment systems. The paper also discusses the characteristics of wastewater, conventional methods of wastewater treatment that have been used so far, and the technological mechanisms for removing nutrients and heavy metals from contaminated water. Microalgae can successfully eliminate the suspended nutrients and have been reported to successfully remove N, P, and heavy metals by up to 99.6 %, 100 %, and 13%–100 % from different types of wastewater. However, although a microalgae-based wastewater treatment system offers some benefits, it also presents some challenges as outlined in the last section of this paper. Performance in eliminating nutrients from wastewater is affected by different parameters such as temperature, biomass productivity, osmotic ability, pH, O 2 concentration. Therefore, the conducting of pilot-scale studies and exploration of the complexities of contaminants under complex environmental conditions is recommended. • Utilization of Microalgae is an environment-friendly method to treat the wastewater. • Microalgae removes the suspended nutrients and polluting compounds from wastewater. • The efficiency of microalgae-based wastewater treatment technology is presented. • Challenges of using microalgae in wastewater treatment is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biodiesel is a fuel that has numerous benefits over traditional petrodiesel. The transesterification process is the most popular method for biodiesel production from various sources, categorized as first, second and third generation biodiesel depending on the source. The transesterification process is subject to a variety of factors that can be taken into account to improve biodiesel yield. One of the factors is catalyst type and concentration, which plays a significant role in the transesterification of biodiesel sources. At present, chemical and biological catalysts are being investigated and each catalyst has its advantages and disadvantages. Recently, nanocatalysts have drawn researchers' attention to the efficient production of biodiesel. This article discusses recent work on the role of several nanocatalysts in the transesterification reaction of various sources in the development of biodiesel. A large number of literature from highly rated journals in scientific indexes is reviewed, including the most recent publications. Most of the authors reported that nanocatalysts show an important influence regarding activity and selectivity. This study highlights that in contrast to conventional catalysts, the highly variable surface area of nanostructure materials favours interaction between catalysts and substrates that efficiently boost the performance of products. Finally, this analysis provides useful information to researchers in developing and processing cost-effective biodiesel. Image 1 • Transesterification is the most efficient catalytic mechanism for biodiesel production. • Nanocatalysts show the important influence in selectivity in transesterification. • Nanocatalysts can be used at a lower temperature and speed up the reaction process. • Comparative benefits and challenges of nanocatalysts are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discharging microplastics into the environment with treated wastewater is becoming a major concern around the world. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) release microplastics into terrestrial and aquatic habitats, mostly from textile, laundry, and cosmetic industries. Despite extensive research on microplastics in the environment, their removal, and WWTP management strategies, highlighting their environmental effects, little is known about microplastics' fate and behaviour during various treatment processes. Microplastics interact with treatment technologies differently due to their diverse physical and chemical characteristics, resulting in varying removal efficiency. Microplastics removed from WWTPs may accumulate in soil and harm terrestrial ecosystems. Few studies have examined the cost, energy use, and trade-offs of large-scale implementation of modern treatment methods for the removal of microplastics. To safeguard aquatic and terrestrial habitats from microplastics' contamination, focused and efficient management techniques must bridge these knowledge gaps. This review summarizes microplastic detection, collection, removal and management strategies. A compilation of treatment process studies on microplastics' removal efficiency and their destiny and transit paths shows recent improvement. Bioremediation, membrane bioreactor (MBR), electrocoagulation, sol-gel technique, flotation, enhanced filtering, and AOPs are evaluated for microplastic removal. The fate and behaviour of microplastics in WWTPs suggest they may be secondary suppliers of microplastics to receiving ecosystems. Innovative microplastic removal strategies and technologies such as nanoparticles, microorganism-based remediation, and tertiary treatment raise issues. These new WWTP technologies are examined for feasibility, limitations, and implementation issues. Pretreatment modifies microplastic size, adsorption potential, and surface morphology to remove microplastics from WWTPs. Membrane bioreactors (MBR) can remove 99.9% of microplastics more efficiently than other approaches. MBR systems require membrane cleaning and fouling control, which raises operational and capital costs. To reduce MPs, plastic alternatives and strict controls, including microplastic waste transformation, should be prioritized. Microplastics must be controlled through monitoring policy execution and awareness. [Display omitted] • Discharging microplastics (MPs) via industrial wastewater is a pressing global issue. • MPs harm soil and ecosystems requiring a search for effective removal technologies. • Membrane bioreactor (MBR) showed effectiveness in removing more than 99.9 % of MPs. • Despite being expensive, bioremediation is demonstrated as an effective approach. • Plastic alternatives and stringent control approaches should be prioritized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corn stover (CS) is one of the most abundant agricultural wastes and is ubiquitous around the world that is left over after grain harvest and accounts for 47–50% dry mass of the total grain yield. The global CS yield is 1661.25 million tons/year, which is 27.2% of the total agricultural waste. CS consists of about 34.5% stems, 32.3% leaves, 14.3% husks, 12.3% cobs and 6.6% flowers, with up to 45% cellulose, 30% hemicellulose and 20% lignin. Due to its favorable economic and environmental potential, CS is considered an ideal raw material for producing biofuels and biobased chemicals, which can largely be divided into carbohydrate and lignin platforms. However, the techno-economic perspectives of CS-based biorefineries have remained questionable due to the inadequate supply chain logistics, lack of cost-effective conversion technologies, limited scale-up of the product-specific technologies, and lower competitiveness in the market compared to their counterparts, such as sugar and starch-based biorefineries. While CS is converted by thermochemical and biochemical approaches, the latter is considered to be more sustainable for its selective conversion under mild conditions using microorganisms. This review aimed to critically discuss the latest research and developments on the biochemical conversion of CS into biofuels and chemicals. In particular, this paper covers the market potential of biofuels and chemicals to which CS can make a significant contribution, technological developments in the microbial conversion of CS, major biofuels and chemicals produced from CS-derived carbohydrates and lignin, and the technoeconomic perspectives of CS-based biorefinery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Membrane technology has rapidly gained popularity in wastewater treatment due to its cost-effectiveness, environmentally friendly tools, and elevated productivity. Although membrane performance in wastewater treatment has been reviewed in several past studies, the key techniques for improving membrane performance, as well as their challenges, and solutions associated with the membrane process, were not sufficiently highlighted in those studies. Also, very few studies have addressed hybrid techniques to improve membrane performance. The present review aims to fill those gaps and achieve public health benefits through safe water processing. Despite its higher cost, membrane performance can result in a 36% reduction in flux degradation. The issue with fouling has been identified as one of the key challenges of membrane technology. Chemical cleaning is quite effective in removing accumulated foulant. Fouling mitigation techniques have also been shown to have a positive effect on membrane photobioreactors that handle wastewater effluent, resulting in a 50% and 60% reduction in fouling rates for backwash and nitrogen bubble scouring techniques. Membrane hybrid approaches such as hybrid forward-reverse osmosis show promise in removing high concentrations of phosphorus, ammonium, and salt from wastewater. The incorporation of the forward osmosis process can reject 99% of phosphorus and 97% of ammonium, and the reverse osmosis approach can achieve a 99% salt rejection rate. The control strategies for membrane fouling have not been successfully optimized yet and more research is needed to achieve a realistic, long-term direct membrane filtering operation. [Display omitted] • Strategies to improve membrane performance in wastewater treatment are reviewed. • Despite its increased cost, membrane performance can reduce flow degradation by 36%. • The fouling issue is identified as one of the key issues of membrane technology. • Mitigation techniques like nitrogen bubble scouring can reduce fouling rates by 60%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phase change materials (PCMs) have garnered significant attention as low-cost thermal energy storage systems that efficiently capture and store solar energy. Recent review works have largely focused only on thermal conductivity enhancement techniques, and/or applications of PCMs, while others have mainly discussed the performance enhancement of either heating, cooling, or clean energy storage systems integrating with PCMs. However, not enough studies recently reviewed all of these techniques/systems comprehensively to provide insights into them. This paper thus comprehensively reviews the integration of PCMs as an enhancement to most types of heating, cooling, and clean energy storage system performance, and the techniques to enhance thermal conductivity. The integration of PCMs with these systems has shown promising performance. For instance, an improvement of 13.5% is found in the efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) system when it is integrated with PCM/Al 2 O 3 nanoparticles. In addition, the solar air heater's daily energy efficiency reaches 17% on its own, but when combined with PCM, it reaches 33%. However, the major drawback of using PCM–TES (thermal energy storage) for cooling is that PCM does not entirely solidify at night. The literature also shows that the issues related to PCMs' low thermal conductivity, phase separation, and subcooling/supercooling, their poor compatibility with other materials, and the environmental hazards they pose hinder their application on a large scale. It is necessary to implement international standards for assessing the thermophysical properties of PCMs and compile data to better facilitate the utilization of PCMs by end-users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Cationic PAETAC & PAmPTAC were synthesized by UV-induced radical polymerization. • New polymers showed good flocculation performance of freshwater & marine microalgae. • Optimal doses of PAETAC were 50 and 4.8 mg/g for C. vulgaris & P. purpureum. • PAETAC and PAmPTAC produced stable flocs, supporting simple dewatering step. This study addresses the challenge of microalgae harvesting through the development of flocculants. Two positively charged cationic polymers including poly[2 (acryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride (PAETAC) and poly(3 acrylamidopropyl)trimethylammonium chloride (PAmPTAC) were synthesized using the UV-induced radical polymerization, for harvesting both freshwater and marine microalgae. The results show that the synthesized polymers have excellent flocculation performance for both freshwater green microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) and marine red microalgae (Porphyridium purpureum). PAETAC outperformed PAmPTAC for both Chlorella vulgaris and Porphyridium purpureum microalgae. The optimal PAETAC doses for Chlorella vulgaris and Porphyridium purpureum microalgae were 50 and 4.8 mg/g of dry biomass while the optimal PAmPTAC doses were 252 and 35 mg/g of dry biomass respectively. Additionally, the floc formation with the PAETAC was more stable than PAmPTAC, which supported the dewatering step via sieving. The superior performance can be attributed to the higher molecular weight of the PAETAC polymer when compared to the PAmPTAC polymer. In comparison to commercially available polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PolyDADMAC), the newly synthesised PAETAC and PAmPTAC polymers demonstrated superior flocculation efficiency at a lower dose. The findings of this study established a platform technology for designing and synthesising cationic flocculants for use in microalgae harvesting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The utilization of renewable lignocellulosic biomasses for bioenergy synthesis is believed to facilitate competitive commercialization and realize affordable clean energy sources in the future. Among the pathways for biomass pretreatment methods that enhance the efficiency of the whole biofuel production process, the combined microwave irradiation and physicochemical approach is found to provide many economic and environmental benefits. Several studies on microwave-based pretreatment technologies for biomass conversion have been conducted in recent years. Although some reviews are available, most did not comprehensively analyze microwave–physicochemical pretreatment techniques for biomass conversion. The study of these techniques is crucial for sustainable biofuel generation. Therefore, the biomass pretreatment process that combines the physicochemical method with microwave-assisted irradiation is reviewed in this paper. The effects of this pretreatment process on lignocellulosic structure and the ratio of achieved components were also discussed in detail. Pretreatment processes for biomass conversion were substantially affected by temperature, irradiation time, initial feedstock components, catalyst loading, and microwave power. Consequently, neoteric technologies utilizing high efficiency-based green and sustainable solutions should receive further focus. In addition, methodologies for quantifying and evaluating effects and relevant trade-offs should be develop to facilitate the take-off of the biofuel industry with clean and sustainable goals. • Fundamental and characteristic of microwave assisted pretreatment were introduced. • Effects of microwave irradiation on the lignocellulosic biomass reviewed. • Combination of microwave physicochemical methods obtained higher efficiency. • Energy and economic aspects of microwave-physicochemical methods evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bioresource valorization to obtain valuable phenolic compounds for medicinal, nutraceutical, food, and cosmetic applications are critical for a current and future sustainable and bio-based economy. Renewable, environmentally friendly, and non-toxic choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents are the newest and utmost environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional organic solvents for the pretreatment and extraction of phenolic compounds. Recently, numerous studies have focused on phenolic compound extraction using choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents as solvents or catalysts. Process variable optimization has been reported in terms of kinetic modeling and mechanisms involved in phenolic compounds extraction. This paper describes the cutting-edge methods used to extract phenolic compounds from different bio-based sources using choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents. In addition, the factors affecting, kinetic models, and mechanisms involved in phenolic compound extraction using choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents are thoroughly summarized. Moreover, future predictions, challenges, and anticipated growth in this field are addressed and can be used for biomass valorization. • Extraction of phenolic compounds using deep eutectic solvents is promising. • Extraction mechanism depends on the nature of the deep eutectic solvent components. • Scaling up should be optimized using experimental and computational approaches. • Recovery of phenolic compound from solvent is difficult due to low vapor pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]