Search

• Proposing an iterative approach to optimize the grid topology and redispatch. • Redispatch and topology optimization are decoupled to reduce complexity. • Linearized models are used to meet the computation time requirements. • The results show that useful topological actions can be selected. • The approach shows promising computation times for use in congestion management. The selection of Remedial Actions (RA) to ensure system security is a highly complex task performed by Transmission System Operators (TSOs). Phase shifting transformer (PST) tap changes and active power changes of generation units (redispatch) are some RA available in Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow (SCOPF) simulations within the operational planning processes. Topological RA are not part of these SCOPF yet, as the optimization thereof adds high complexity to the existing optimization problem. To overcome this complexity, this paper introduces an iterative approach that decouples topology optimization from redispatch & PST optimization. Linearized models of RA are used to meet computation time requirements. Exemplary investigations of the presented method were performed based on modified IEEE 39-Bus, 118-Bus and PEGASE-1354-Bus grid models. Within the scope of these investigations, the method shows good results and a great potential for the reduction of congestions and required redispatch through topological RA. In order to eliminate inaccuracies of the approach and to further improve its suitability for use in grid operation, a need for future investigations and possible further developments were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Energy System Optimization Models are applied to inform decision making processes and therefore must account for the uncertainty as it exists in the real world. In the recent decade, Modeling to Generate Alternatives gained popularity for considering structural uncertainty in Energy System Optimization Models. Modeling to Generate Alternatives finds numerous near-optimal alternatives, which could give the impression that all alternatives are comparably good. However, if one could compare near-optimal shadow prices of energy demand, certain alternatives would be superior to other solutions. Nevertheless, shadow prices of near-optimal solutions reflect the effort of being different and no approach to calculate expedient shadow prices of near-optimal solutions (comparable to the optimal one) has been presented. A simple approach is suggested and discussed with its implications, using an example scenario. The obtained shadow prices further differentiate the quality of solutions in the near-optimal solution space. Deeper analysis reveals regional or temporal bottlenecks of solutions and can help identify better search directions for alternative solutions. To some extent, the shadow prices highlight effects of parametric uncertainty, even though the proposed method cannot counteract this uncertainty. • Energy System Optimization Modeling benefits from analysis of near-optimal solutions. • Approach to enable expedient comparison of near-optimal shadow prices is presented. • Numerous near-optimal solutions are evaluated using said shadow prices. • Shadow prices differentiate the quality of Modeling to Generate Alternatives' solutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]