Search

Micellization of several surfactants in water−organic solvent mixtures has been investigated. Only solvents localized mainly in the bulk phase of the micellar solutions (they do not incorporate into the micelles) were studied, with either higher or lower permittivity than that of pure water. Results show that the influence of organic solvent addition on the aggregation process can be approximately accounted for by considering the changes in the bulk phase cohesive energy density, described by the Gordon parameter, G. To our knowledge, this is the first time that, for a given surfactant, the Gibbs energies of micellization, Δ GM°, obtained in several water−organic solvent mixtures have been fitted together. It is worth noting that data from different research groups have been considered. The Δ GM° versus Gcorrelation will permit the estimation of the variations in the Gibbs energy of micellization upon addition of known quantities of a given polar organic solvent. Speaking in a general way, organic solvent addition results in the bulk phase becoming a better solvent for the surfactant molecules. This would make the hydrophobic tail transfer from the bulk phase into the micelles less favorable and, as a consequence, Δ GM° increases (becomes less negative), making the aggregation process less spontaneous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The micellization and micellar growth of cationic dimeric surfactant propanediyl---bis(dodecyldimethylammonium) bromide, 12-3-12,2Br-, have been studied in several water−organic solvent mixtures. The organic solvents were ethylene glycol, glycerol, 1,2-propylene glycol, 1,3-propylene glycol, acetonitrile, dioxane, formamide, and N,N-dimethylformamide. Results showed that the aggregation process was less favored in the binary mixtures than in pure water, which was explained by considering the influence of the solvophobic effect on micellization. The addition of organic solvents was accompanied by a diminution in the average aggregation number, Nagg, of the dimeric micelles. This diminution was due to the decrease in the interfacial Gibbs energy contribution, %@mt;sys@%%@ital@%G%@rsf@%%@sx@%interfacial%@be@%o%@sxx@%%@mx@%, to the Gibbs energy of micellization caused by the decrease in the hydrocarbon/bulk-phase interfacial tension. As a result of the micelle size diminution, the concentration at which the sphere-to-rod transition occurred, C, was higher in the mixtures than in pure water. Micelle size reduction is accompanied by a decrease in the ionic interactions and in the extra packing contribution to the deformation of the surfactants tails, making the formation of cylindrical micelles less favorable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]