Search

Background: We tested the coupling portion of a prototype intraluminal distraction enterogenesis device to allow flow-through of simulated enteric contents (SEC) in both pig and human jejunum. Materials and Methods: SEC was made using 80% corn syrup. Ten-cm pig and human intestinal segments had a spoke-shaped 2.2 cm coupling adaptor sutured in place, intraluminally. The adaptor had a flow-through area of 33.6 mm2. SEC was pumped into the proximal part of the intestinal segment at 0.083 mL/s. The times to first passage of SEC through the coupler (first drop), 10 mL, and 20mL of SEC eluted from the distal end were recorded. Results: Mean time to first drop elution was 155 ± 38 s with pig, and 149 ± 22 s with human bowel (P = 0.8). This corresponded to a hydrostatic pressure of 37.5 mmHg before the initial drop passed through. Mean flow rates were 0.094 mL/s in pig bowel and 0.084 mL/s in human bowel (P = 0.09). To account for occlusion from luminal debris, a 75% occlusion of coupler holes was studied in the smaller pig bowel to investigate if reductions in flow-through area could be tolerated. Mean time to first drop increased slightly to 171±15 s, but the elution rate stayed the same (P = 0.5). Conclusions: After a physiologic level of initial pressure buildup allowing the first drop of SEC to pass the coupling adaptor, our prototype intestinal coupling adaptor did not obstruct flow-through of SEC, even after a 75% decrease in flow-through area. This type of attachment represents a viable approach to placing a device in-continuity without obstructing flow of enteric contents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Distraction enterogenesis is a novel method for increasing small bowel length by the application of linearly directed forces. However, the magnitude of distractive forces that human and animal small bowel can safely withstand is unknown. Methods: Acute ex vivo force-displacement curves for human (n = 5) and pig (n = 6) small intestine (with and without mesentery) were made by applying increasing amounts of distractive forces to bowel immersed in normal saline (39°C). Progressive load was applied until gross disruption of the tissue was detected, or the applied force reached 1000 gram-force (gf). Histology was used to detect evidence of load-induced damage. In vivo blood flow to pig bowel with distractive loads (30–200 gf) was measured by laser Doppler. Results: The relationship between the level of force and degree of displacement was linear. The presence of a mesentery increased stiffness of pig bowel, but did not affect human bowel. Gross tissue disruption in pig and human tissue was seen at forces between 235 and 295 gf, respectively. However, in grossly undamaged areas, histology was unchanged even after application of higher loads. With in vivo testing, mesenteric blood flow was present up to 200 gf; however, blood flow to the bowel wall was reduced to undetectable levels at loads exceeding 100 gf. Conclusions: While whole bowel tissue may tolerate greater applied loads, blood flow to the bowel wall was compromised at loads over 100 gf, suggesting that any higher forces place the bowel at risk for ischemia. These measurements will help guide the clinical application of distraction enterogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postoperative (postop) management of pediatric perforated appendicitis varies significantly, and postop intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA) remain a significant issue. Between 2019 and 2020, our standardized protocol included routine postop labs after an appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. However, given the lack of predictive utility of these routine labs, we discontinued this practice in 2021. We hypothesize that discontinuing routine postop labs will not be associated with an increase in complication rates after an appendectomy for pediatric perforated appendicitis. A single-institution, retrospective review of all pediatric appendectomies for perforated appendicitis from January 2019 to December 2021 was conducted at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio. Data were collected on rate of complications (IAA development, re-admissions, bowel obstructions, superficial surgical site infections, intensive care unit transfers, Clostridium difficile infections, allergic reactions, and transfusions), postop imaging, postop interventions, and length of stay. Statistical analysis was completed using Fisher's exact test and Mann–Whitney U -test. A total of 109 patients (2019-2020 n = 61, 2021 n = 48) were included in the study. All 61 patients from 2019 to 2020 had postop labs compared to only eight patients in 2021. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in overall complication rates, but there was a decrease in IAAs reported in 2021 (P = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in other complications, postop imaging usage, or postop interventions. The median length of stay was 4.5 d in 2021 compared to 6.0 d in 2019-2020 (P = 0.009). Discontinuing routine postop labs is not associated with an increase in overall complications rates. Further studies are needed to determine whether routine postop labs can be safely removed in pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis, which would reduce patient discomfort and care costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) is a common morbidity in neonates requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Previous studies in infants with intestinal failure have shown a benefit of mixed lipid emulsion (MLE) in reducing PNAC. It is not known whether this benefit extends to a general neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population, where MLE is used on a selective basis. The objective of this study is to examine associations between MLE use and PNAC rate in the general NICU setting. This is a retrospective review of NICU patients who received TPN for 7 or more days. We compared patients born between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2015 (pre-MLE) to patients born between 7/1/2017 and 12/31/2018 (post-MLE). Fisher's exact test and two-sample t -test were used to compare the two groups. There were 353 patients in 2014-2015 and 271 patients in 2017-2018. Demographics were similar between the two groups, but there were more patients with congenital heart disease in the MLE era (P < 0.001). Mortality was similar (6.2% pre-MLE versus 6.3% post-MLE). There was no significant difference in PNAC rate between the pre-MLE (11.5%) and post-MLE (14.1%) patient cohorts (P = 0.342). Among patients receiving MLE (n = 38), 58% developed PNAC, while only 6.4% of the post-MLE cohort not receiving MLE developed PNAC. Of the patients coded with a surgical diagnosis, there was no significant difference in PNAC rates between pre-MLE and post-MLE groups. Discharge rates of PNAC did differ between pre-MLE surgical patients (13.0%) and post-MLE surgical patients (8.2%). In the subgroup of post-MLE surgical patients, PNAC rate differed significantly between those receiving MLE (43.5%) and not receiving MLE (15.4%). However, this difference was resolved by discharge (8.7% versus 7.7%). There were no significant differences in PNAC rates between the pre-MLE and post-MLE cohorts. However, in surgical patients, MLE was associated with reduced PNAC at discharge, with levels equivalent to those seen in neonates receiving TPN for 7 or more days, despite having a higher starting rate of PNAC. Further studies are needed to determine whether the general NICU population may benefit from MLE or certain selective subpopulations like surgical patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aim to evaluate the utility of postoperative labs in predicting the development of an intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) in pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis. We hypothesize that postoperative labs are not predictive of IAA development. This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study that included pediatric patients (n = 61) who underwent surgery for perforated appendicitis from January 1, 2019 to December 1, 2020. Patients were stratified into those who developed a postoperative IAA (n = 22) and those who did not (n = 39). Postoperative labs (white blood cell [WBC] count, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, C-reactive protein) were examined. Mann–Whitney U tests and chi-square tests were used to assess for differences between groups. There was extensive heterogeneity and overlap in postoperative lab values between patients who developed an IAA and those who did not. Almost all patients who developed an IAA had clinical signs that were indicative of abscess formation regardless of their postoperative WBC count or change in WBC count. While patients who developed an IAA had a higher postoperative median WBC count (10.8 versus 8.4, P = 0.003) and a smaller WBC count decrease (−4.9 versus −7.4, P = 0.01), no cutoff value for any of the examined lab values specifically predicted abscess formation. Postoperative median absolute neutrophil count (7.4 versus 4.0, P = 0.15), platelet count (360 versus 353, P = 0.98), and C-reactive protein (8.20 versus 5.32, P = 0.06) did not differ significantly. We conclude that postoperative labs have limited clinical utility in evaluating IAA development in children with perforated appendicitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]