1. Exact confidence limits compatible with the result of a sequential trial.
- Author
-
Lloyd, Chris J.
- Subjects
- *
CONFIDENCE intervals , *ACCEPTANCE sampling , *FALSE positive error , *ERROR rates - Abstract
Sequential (or adaptive) designs are common in acceptance sampling and pharmaceutical trials. This is because they can achieve the same type 1 and type 2 error rate with fewer subjects on average than fixed sample trials. After the trial is completed and the test result decided, we need full inference on the main parameter Δ. In this paper, we are interested in exact one-sided lower and upper limits. Unlike standard trials, for sequential trials there need not be an explicit test statistic, nor even p -value. This motivates the more general approach of defining an ordering on the sample space and using the construction of Buehler (1957). This is guaranteed to produce exact limits, however, there is no guarantee that the limits will agree with the test. For instance, we might reject Δ ≤ Δ 0 at level α but have a lower 1 − α limit being less then Δ 0. This paper gives a very simple condition to ensure that this unfortunate feature does not occur. When the condition fails, the ordering is easily modified to ensure compatibility. • For sequential tests, it is unclear how to define a p-value which can be inverted to a confidence limit. • Consequently, confidence limits can conflict with the results of a sequential test. • For discrete endpoints, standard approximate limits have poor accuracy so we seek exact limits. • Exact limits also need not agree with the results of an exact sequential test. • We give a simple easily checked condition that ensures agreement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF