Search

Inequalities in service provision: an examination of institutional influences on the provision of district nursing care to minority ethnic communities This paper reports on the selected findings from a larger ethnographic study of the provision of district nursing care to patients from different ethnic backgrounds. The two-stage study was undertaken in an English community National Health Service (NHS) trust serving an ethnically diverse population. The first stage comprised an organizational profile in order to analyse the local policy context, including specific responses to ethnic diversity. Data were collected by means of in-depth interviews with managers. The second stage entailed a participant observational study focusing on six district nursing teams. Purposive sampling was used to identify four teams with high minority ethnic caseloads and two teams with predominately white ethnic majority caseloads. Interview transcripts and field-notes were analysed by drawing upon the principles of dimensional analysis. The paper focuses upon institutional influences on the provision of care to minority ethnic communities. An analysis of the allocation of district nursing resource to different general practitioner (GP) practices identified marked inequalities in the district nursing provision which impacted upon the services provided to minority ethnic patients. Single-handed, inner city GP practices with a large minority ethnic practice population received a much smaller allocation of nursing staff than single group practices serving a smaller and predominately white practice population. The reasons why this situation existed are explored and an explanation offered as to why it had not been rectified. Observation of caseload management indicated that despite differences in the size of the practice populations served by the respective teams, all patients referred for nursing care received it. However, several covert processes appeared to limit the caseload size of those teams with large practice populations so that it remained manageable within the limited nursing resource available. It is concluded that although nurses at an individual level did not appear overtly to disadvantage minority ethnic patients, institutional forces conspired to perpetuate the disadvantage experienced by minority ethnic communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: This paper is a report of a survey to provide an overview of nurse independent prescribing and nurse supplementary prescribing across the United Kingdom. BACKGROUND: Evidence examining the frequency of prescribing by nurses is conflicting, and it is evident that several factors hamper prescribing practice. As of May 2006, legislative changes gave appropriately qualified nurses virtually the same independent prescribing right as doctors. However, there is currently no evidence available about the prescribing practices of these nurses. METHOD: A random sample of 1992 qualified Nurse Independent/Nurse Supplementary Prescribers registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council was sent a postal questionnaire in 2006. A total of 1400 (70%) questionnaires were returned, of which 1377 were completed. FINDINGS: Eight hundred and ninety-one (65%) respondents worked in primary care, and 333 (24.3%) worked in secondary care. Three quarters of the sample had more than 5-year clinical experience in the area in which they prescribed prior to entering the prescribing programme. One thousand one hundred and seven (87%) participants had used nurse independent prescribing and 568 (44.6%) nurse supplementary prescribing. Restriction of local arrangements, implementation of the Clinical Management Plan and access to doctors hampered or prevented prescribing. CONCLUSION: The adoption of prescribing by nurses in the United Kingdom has increased patient choice with regard to access to medicines. A number of factors which hamper or prevent prescribing require further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this paper is to show the way in which the decision trail of a qualitative research process can be maintained. It is argued that the trustworthiness (rigour) of a study may be established if the reader is able to audit the events, influences and actions of the researcher. The actual study containing the recording of this decision trail aimed to express the concerns of older patients who were admitted to the acute care sector. The study took place in two care of the elderly wards in a 1000-bed National Health Service hospital in the UK, in 1991. Eventually, 14 patients were interviewed, each on several occasions, and their concerns are expressed in themes, namely: routine geriatric style of care, depersonalization, care deprivation and geriatric segregation. I describe the preparations that were undertaken before patient interviews could commence. The literature recording the process of the interviewer's experience as data in qualitative research is scarce. I show the researcher's participation in making the data as part of an existential phenomenological research process. Existential phenomenology relies on recording influences while generating data such as significant literature, media reports, my value position and journal data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

clouder l. & sellars j. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 46(3), 262–269 Reflective practice and clinical supervision: an interprofessional perspective In the United Kingdom, the drive to encourage reflective practice through clinical supervision, as a means of ensuring quality of provision in nursing and other health care professions, is now well-embedded, not only in policy but also in practice. However, debate and critique of these concepts is limited. The aim of this paper is to draw on research, conducted with undergraduate occupational therapy students and qualified physiotherapists, in order to contribute to the debate about the functions of clinical supervision and reflective practice in nursing and other health care professions. Upholding the notion that clinical supervision has the potential to constitute a form of surveillance, we counter the assumption that it is inevitably confessional in nature. A social constructionist perspective is used to illustrate how clinical supervision might involve a complex interplay of factors that dispel notions of predictability, control and rationality. Despite acknowledging tensions, we argue that clinical supervision is both necessary and beneficial. It can be advantageous to individual practitioners and professional groups in enhancing practice and accountability, and promoting professional development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, patient advocacy has been claimed as an integral part of the nurse's role in health care delivery in the United Kingdom (UK). Support from the nursing leadership/elite is seen as important in the promulgation and diffusion of any 'new' role in nursing. This paper explores the perceptions and attitudes of nurse leaders in the UK to the adoption of the patient advocate role as an 'innovation' in nursing. Using a qualitative methodology, semi-structured interviews with six of nursing's 'elite' were conducted over a period of 5 months. Results revealed contradictions and paradoxes within the views of the elite. Although leaders recognized patient advocacy as a role integral to the moral value system in nursing enhanced by the nurse-patient relationship, they objected to the professionalization of the role, seeing an exclusive claim to patient advocacy as intensifying interprofessional conflicts in health care. It is argued that unless professionalized, the individual nurse will continue this potentially risky activity without adequate authority or support systems. The results overall question the role of the nursing leadership in the diffusion of innovations in nursing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]