Search

Abstract: The formation of beach megacusps along the shoreline of southern Monterey Bay, CA, is investigated using time-averaged video and simulated with XBeach, a recently developed coastal sediment transport model. Investigations focus on the hydrodynamic role played by the bay''s ever-present rip channels. A review of four years of video and wave data from Sand City, CA, indicates that megacusps most often form shoreward of rip channels under larger waves (significant wave height (H s )=1.5–2.0m). However, they also occasionally appear shoreward of shoals when waves are smaller (H s ~1m) and the mean water level is higher on the beach. After calibration to the Sand City site, XBeach is shown to hindcast measured shoreline change moderately well (skill=0.41) but to overpredict the erosion of the swash region and beach face. Simulations with small to moderate waves (H s =0.5–1.2m) suggest, similar to field data, that megacusps will form shoreward of either rip channels or shoals, depending on mean daily water level and pre-existing beach shape. A frequency-based analysis of sediment transport forcing is performed, decomposing transport processes to the mean, infragravity, and very-low-frequency (VLF) contributions for two highlighted cases. Results indicate that the mean flow plays the dominant role in both types of megacusp formation, but that VLF oscillations in sediment concentration and advective flow are also significant. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: A 2DH numerical, model which is capable of computing nearshore circulation and morphodynamics, including dune erosion, breaching and overwash, is used to simulate overwash caused by Hurricane Ivan (2004) on a barrier island. The model is forced using parametric wave and surge time series based on field data and large-scale numerical model results. The model predicted beach face and dune erosion reasonably well as well as the development of washover fans. Furthermore, the model demonstrated considerable quantitative skill (upwards of 66% of variance explained, maximum bias −0.21m) in hindcasting the post-storm shape and elevation of the subaerial barrier island when a sheet flow sediment transport limiter was applied. The prediction skill ranged between 0.66 and 0.77 in a series of sensitivity tests in which several hydraulic forcing parameters were varied. The sensitivity studies showed that the variations in the incident wave height and wave period affected the entire simulated island morphology while variations in the surge level gradient between the ocean and back barrier bay affected the amount of deposition on the back barrier and in the back barrier bay. The model sensitivity to the sheet flow sediment transport limiter, which served as a proxy for unknown factors controlling the resistance to erosion, was significantly greater than the sensitivity to the hydraulic forcing parameters. If no limiter was applied the simulated morphological response of the barrier island was an order of magnitude greater than the measured morphological response. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Cross-shore profile response to energetic wave events is challenging to predict because the physics are poorly understood and wave and topographic data are often sparse or unknown. Six events with varying duration, wave intensity and beach slopes are used to calibrate and assess two process-based cross-shore models, CShore and XBeach, at two southern California beaches. Model performance is quantitatively evaluated using high resolution spatiotemporal survey observations along with Brier Skill Scores (BSS) and a Beach Elevation Change Error (BECE) metric that evaluates alongshore-averaged upper beach volume predictions. XBeach is tested with default and site-calibrated parameters. Calibration improved skill for all profiles and events, however XBeach skill scores often remained low and in no case correctly predicted the offshore bar formation. Notably, XBeach is sensitive to the beach profile's calibration depth extent. Upper beach calibration produced significantly different skill than when the full profile was considered. CShore was tested using both the 'Atlantic' and 'Pacific' parameters. Both models predict profile change with limited skill. In their present forms, CShore and XBeach are unable to accurately predict beach profile change on these typical southern California beaches, but when calibrated may provide qualitatively useful beach face erosion estimates. • XBeach and CShore are calibrated and evaluated at two southern California beaches. • Model performance is assessed using the Brier Skill Score and a 'Beach Elevation Change' fit measure. • CShore and XBeach did not accurately predict beach profile change in moderate events. • XBeach calibration is sensitive to beach profile depth extent. • Generally, CShore 'Pacific' parameters produced lower skill scores than 'Atlantic'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]