Search

Background: Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) to peanut and its components may influence the clinical reactivity to peanut. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy is known for modifying both IgE and IgG4. Peanut oral immunotherapy may influence these serological parameters. Methods: Exploratory analyses of serological data from participants receiving peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder‐dnfp (PTAH) and placebo in the double‐blind, randomized, phase 3 PALISADE trial were conducted to evaluate potential relationships between peanut‐specific and peanut component–specific (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6, Ara h 8, and Ara h 9) IgE and IgG4 levels and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 269 participants (PTAH, n = 202; placebo, n = 67) were analyzed. No relationship was observed between specific IgE and IgG4 levels at screening and maximum tolerated peanut protein dose during screening or response status during exit double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). In PTAH‐treated participants, no relationship was observed between IgE and IgG4 levels at screening and maximum symptom severity during exit DBPCFC. Postscreening ratios (ie, postscreening/screening) in the PTAH group were significant at the end of updosing and exit visit for most components. Postscreening changes in specific IgE levels were more pronounced with PTAH versus placebo for most components. Conclusions: Specific IgE and IgG4 levels at screening are not correlated with screening or exit DBPCFC results, and are not predictive of clinical response to PTAH. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder‐dnfp contains the relevant and immunodominant allergens, inducing immunological changes with the treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02635776. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) is significantly and substantially reduced in individuals with peanut allergy due to many factors associated with unanticipated or potentially fatal reactions. Further insight on the impact of peanut oral immunotherapy in managing peanut allergy on HRQoL is needed. The aim of this analysis was to assess effects of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder‐dnfp (PTAH), a biologic drug for peanut oral immunotherapy, on HRQoL from three phase 3 and two follow‐on trials of PTAH. Methods: HRQoL assessments from participants aged 4–17 in the PALISADE (ARC003), ARC004 (PALISADE follow‐on), ARTEMIS (ARC010), RAMSES (ARC007), and ARC011 (RAMSES follow‐on) trials were included in this analysis. Responses on the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (FAQLQ) and Food Allergy Independent Measure (FAIM) were evaluated by age group and respondent (self or caregiver proxy). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Student t tests. Results: Baseline FAQLQ and FAIM total scores appeared comparable between PTAH‐ and placebo‐treated participants. Self and caregiver proxy‐reported total scores on the FAQLQ for PTAH‐treated participants generally improved at trial exit versus baseline; FAIM total scores improved throughout all trials. The tendency for improvement in FAQLQ total scores from baseline for PTAH appeared larger in self versus caregiver proxy‐reports. Between treatment groups, PTAH was generally favored in the PALISADE and ARTEMIS trials; differences varied in the RAMSES trial based on age and respondent types. Conclusions: PTAH for the management of peanut allergy in children appeared to have a beneficial effect on HRQoL in trials. Improvements were seen despite rigors of trial participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]