Search

Isotope dilution techniques (IDT) and sequential extraction procedures (SEPs) were compared to apprehend the differences between two techniques in determining metal exchangeability and vulnerability to pollute the urban groundwater. For this purpose, soil (n = 2), "soakaway" sediment deposited in the artificial infiltration facilities (AIF) (n = 4), and road dust (n = 2) were sampled from Tokyo metropolitan. Sorption coefficients of four metals (Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb) were assessed through isotopic exchangeability (E-value) and potential mobile pool i.e. addition of exchangeable, reducible and oxidizable fraction obtained by Community Bureau of Reference (BCR)-procedures. The E-value for the three samples were found smaller than the potential mobile pool but were higher than BCR-exchangeable fractions. The use of strong extractants are likely to play an active role in the disagreement between SEPs and IDT. IDT accounts for the isotopic exchangeability while BCR provides information of vulnerability of metals associated with different fractions that can leach under different environmental conditions. Sorption coefficients measured in soakaway sediment was found comparable to soil thus likely to retain metals. However, as variability in environmental conditions is likely to affect Kd, the soakaway sediment may become an active metal source in future rather than acting as the permanent sink. The study concludes that there is the possibility of errors while predicting metal vulnerability to groundwater with both techniques and thus a model compliance integrating the virtue of both techniques will be a way forward. Image 1 • Better compliance amid isotope dilution and sequential extraction for high metal loading. • Isotopic exchangeability (E-value) was smaller than extracted potential mobile pool. • Coupling of IDT with BCR provide better estimate of leaching vulnerability for metals. • IDT accounts for actual exchangeability while SEPs provide leaching vulnerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]