Search

In today's crowded and water scarce world dispute regarding water sharing is ineluctable. Bangladesh and India, the two friendly neighboring countries of South Asia, are not an exception to it. Among the disputes between these two countries, the most important is the dispute concerning water sharing. They share 54 rivers between them and the main rivers are the Ganges, Brahmaputra, Meghna and Teesta. India as an upper riparian state always shows an unwillingness or reluctance to share the water of the rivers equitably and reasonably. Moreover, India follows the policy to control the natural flows of the international watercourse by constructing dams, installing power plants and by diverting the natural course of rivers without notifying the lower riparian country Bangladesh. As a result, there is a steady reduction of water flow in Bangladesh and during the lean season rivers become waterless. The aim of my paper is to assess these situations of water disputes under international law especially the water dispute concerning Teesta. The assessment will cover the principles of transboundary water resources management as envisaged in the customary international law; Helsinki Rules 1966; UN water Course Convention 1997 and judicial decisions in cases regarding international watercourses. In addition, the Ganges Water Treaty has also been taken into account. While concluding I have put my words for co-operation rather than confrontation to solve the Teesta water dispute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]