Search

The problem of finding a maximum size matching in a graph (known as the maximum matching problem) is one of the most classical problems in computer science. Despite a significant body of work dedicated to the study of this problem in the data stream model, the state-of-the-art single-pass semi-streaming algorithm for it is still a simple greedy algorithm that computes a maximal matching, and this way obtains 1 / 2 -approximation. Some previous works described two/three-pass algorithms that improve over this approximation ratio by using their second and third passes to improve the above mentioned maximal matching. One contribution of this paper continues this line of work by presenting new three-pass semi-streaming algorithms that work along these lines and obtain improved approximation ratios of 0.6111 and 0.5694 for triangle-free and general graphs, respectively. Unfortunately, a recent work Konrad and Naidu (Approximation, randomization, and combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and techniques, APPROX/RANDOM 2021, August 16–18, 2021. LIPIcs, vol 207, pp 19:1–19:18, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.19) shows that the strategy of constructing a maximal matching in the first pass and then improving it in further passes has limitations. Additionally, this technique is unlikely to get us closer to single-pass semi-streaming algorithms obtaining a better than 1 / 2 -approximation. Therefore, it is interesting to come up with algorithms that do something else with their first pass (we term such algorithms non-maximal-matching-first algorithms). No such algorithms were previously known, and the main contribution of this paper is describing such algorithms that obtain approximation ratios of 0.5384 and 0.5555 in two and three passes, respectively, for general graphs. The main significance of our results is not in the numerical improvements, but in demonstrating the potential of non-maximal-matching-first algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Randomized search heuristics such as evolutionary algorithms are frequently applied to dynamic combinatorial optimization problems. Within this paper, we present a dynamic model of the classic weighted vertex cover problem and analyze the runtime performances of the well-studied algorithms randomized local search and (1 + 1) EA adapted to it, to contribute to the theoretical understanding of evolutionary computing for problems with dynamic changes. In our investigations, we use an edge-based representation based on the dual form of the Linear Programming formulation for the problem and study the expected runtime that the adapted algorithms require to maintain a 2-approximate solution when the given weighted graph is modified by an edge-editing or weight-editing operation. Considering the weights on the vertices may be exponentially large with respect to the size of the graph, the step size adaption strategy is incorporated, with or without the 1/5-th rule that is employed to control the increasing/decreasing rate of the step size. Our results show that three of the four algorithms presented in the paper can recompute 2-approximate solutions for the studied dynamic changes in polynomial expected runtime, but the (1 + 1) EA with 1/5-th rule requires pseudo-polynomial expected runtime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the generalized minimum Manhattan network (GMMN) problem: given a set P of pairs of points in the Euclidean plane R 2 , we are required to find a minimum-length geometric network which consists of axis-aligned segments and contains a shortest path in the L 1 metric (a so-called Manhattan path) for each pair in P . This problem commonly generalizes several NP-hard network design problems that admit constant-factor approximation algorithms, such as the rectilinear Steiner arborescence (RSA) problem, and it is open whether so does the GMMN problem. As a bottom-up exploration, Schnizler (2015) focused on the intersection graphs of the rectangles defined by the pairs in P , and gave a polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithm for the GMMN problem whose input is restricted so that both the treewidth and the maximum degree of its intersection graph are bounded by constants. In this paper, as the first attempt to remove the degree bound, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for the star case, and extend it to the general tree case based on an improved dynamic programming approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study two-stage robust variants of combinatorial optimization problems on undirected graphs, like Steiner tree, Steiner forest, and uncapacitated facility location. Robust optimization problems, previously studied by Dhamdhere et al. (Proc. of 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05), pp. 367-378, ), Golovin et al. (Proc. of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), ), and Feige et al. (Proc. of the 12th International Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference, pp. 439-453, ), are two-stage planning problems in which the requirements are revealed after some decisions are taken in Stage 1. One has to then complete the solution, at a higher cost, to meet the given requirements. In the robust k-Steiner tree problem, for example, one buys some edges in Stage 1. Then k terminals are revealed in Stage 2 and one has to buy more edges, at a higher cost, to complete the Stage 1 solution to build a Steiner tree on these terminals. The objective is to minimize the total cost under the worst-case scenario. In this paper, we focus on the case of exponentially many scenarios given implicitly. A scenario consists of any subset of k terminals (for k-Steiner tree), or any subset of k terminal-pairs (for k-Steiner forest), or any subset of k clients (for facility location). Feige et al. (Proc. of the 12th International Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference, pp. 439-453, ) give an LP-based general framework for approximation algorithms for a class of two stage robust problems. Their framework cannot be used for network design problems like k-Steiner tree (see later elaboration). Their framework can be used for the robust facility location problem, but gives only a logarithmic approximation. We present the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for the robust k-Steiner tree (with exponential number of scenarios) and robust uncapacitated facility location problems. Our algorithms are combinatorial and are based on guessing the optimum cost and clustering to aggregate nearby vertices. For the robust k-Steiner forest problem on trees and with uniform multiplicative increase factor for Stage 2 (also known as inflation), we present a constant approximation. We show APX-hardness of the robust min-cut problem (even with singleton-set scenarios), resolving an open question of (Dhamdhere et al. in Proc. of 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05), pp. 367-378, ) and (Golovin et al. in Proc. of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]