Search

Abstract: The adaptation of a national/continental-scale model of carbon uptake to the local-scale using highly detailed airborne discrete lidar and hyperspectral data was investigated at a boreal forest mixedwood site in northern Ontario. Spatially explicit maps of canopy chlorophyll concentration and the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy (FPAR) under direct and diffuse radiative conditions were developed for five time periods in 2004 (i.e., winter (January 1–May 31), leaf-out (June 1–20), summer (June 21–July 31 and August 1–31) and senescence (September 1–30)). The maps were used in conjunction with meteorological measurements, such as incident total and diffuse PAR, global solar radiation, and air temperature, taken on a flux tower which is located at the center of the study. Distinct spatial patterns in FPAR, a result of changes in canopy chlorophyll concentration, are increasingly evident throughout the season because of the variation in species groupings within the 1-km radius surrounding the flux tower. In general, the model shows a good correlation to flux-tower-measured gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) (r 2 =0.70 for 10-day averages throughout the year), with the largest deviations occurring in June–July. Species-level data shows the influence of a large homogenous patch of black spruce on the tower measured GEP and demonstrates the contribution of white birch, by far the most dominant species, to the total GEP for the area. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The spatial variability of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy (fPAR) was characterized for a heterogeneous boreal mixedwood forest site located in northern Ontario, Canada, based on relationships found between fPAR and light detection and ranging (lidar) data over different canopy architectures. Estimates of fPAR were derived from radiation measurements made above the canopy at a flux tower and below-canopy radiation was measured across a range of species compositions and canopy architectures. Airborne lidar data were used to characterize spatial variability of canopy structure around the flux tower and a map of mean canopy chlorophyll concentration was derived from airborne hyperspectral imagery. Different volumes of lidar points for the locations directly above each photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) sensor were examined to determine if there is an optimal method of relating lidar returns to estimated fPAR values. The strongest correlations between mean lidar height and fPAR occurred when using points that fell within a theoretical cone which originated at the PAR sensor having a solid angle α =55°. For diffuse conditions, the correlation (r) between mean lidar height versus fPAR×chlorophyll was stronger than between mean lidar height versus fPAR by 8% for mean daily fPAR and from 10 to 20% for diurnal fPAR, depending on solar zenith angle. For direct light conditions, the relationship was improved by 12% for mean daily fPAR and 12–41% for diurnal relationships. Linear regression models of mean daily fPAR×chlorophyll versus mean lidar height were used in conjunction with gridded lidar data and the canopy chlorophyll map to generate maps of mean daily fPAR for direct and diffuse sunlight conditions. Site average fPAR calculated from these maps was 0.79 for direct light conditions and 0.78 for diffuse conditions. When compared to point estimates of mean daily fPAR calculated on the tower, the average fPAR was significantly lower than the point estimate. Subtracting the direct sunlight fPAR map from the diffuse sunlight fPAR map revealed a distinct spatial pattern showing that areas with open canopies and relatively low chlorophyll (e.g., black spruce patches) have a higher fPAR under direct sunlight conditions, while closed canopies with higher chlorophyll (e.g., deciduous species) absorb more PAR under diffuse conditions. These findings have implications for scaling from point measurements at flux towers to larger resolution satellite imagery and addressing local scale heterogeneity in flux tower footprints. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]