Search

With figures such as Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Feuerbach, Marx, Engels, and Nietzsche, the nineteenth century was a dynamic time of philosophical development. The period made lasting contributions to several fields of philosophy. Moreover, it paved the way for the development of the social sciences at the turn of the twentieth century. This volume is dedicated to exploring the rich tradition of nineteenth-century Continental philosophy in its different areas with the main purpose of highlighting the importance of this tradition in the development of the leading streams of thought of the twentieth and twenty-first century.

Książka stanowi monografię filozofii politycznej Hegla ujmowanej w perspektywie dwóch zjawisk granicznych dla jego systemu: wojny i motłochu. Oba fenomeny społeczno-historyczne nie pozwalają gładko się wpisać w Heglowską teorię polityczną: są jej ślepą plamką, która stawia opór i otwiera na niedające się opanować sprzeczności. Myśliciel czyniący ze sprzeczności podstawową zasadę swojej filozofii zostaje tym samym zaskoczony sprzecznościami, których nie potrafi skutecznie pojednać. To napięcie pomiędzy filozoficzną teorią antagonizmu a rzeczywistym antagonizmem społecznym – zewnętrznym w wojnie pomiędzy narodami oraz wewnętrznym w eksplozji motłochu w społeczeństwie kapitalistycznym – jest centralnym zagadnieniem książki. Autor, rekonstruując myśl polityczną Hegla, prowadzi także dyskusję z najważniejszymi komentarzami i interpretacjami niemieckiego filozofa, od Karola Marksa począwszy, przez Alexandre'a Kojève'a i György'a Lukácsa, na Marku Siemku i Slavoju Žižku skończywszy. „Może przesadzam, ale mówię to z najgłębszego przekonania, tekst pracy wygląda jak Luwr. W każdej sali – rozdziale, podrozdziale czy podpunktach – stajemy przed kolejnymi obrazami. I trudno zatrzymać wzrok przy jednym, gdyż autor – wciągając czytelnika do lektury – prowadzi do kolejnego obrazu”. [z recenzji Profesora Wojciecha Kaute] „Zamysł radykalnego i pogłębionego odczytania w filozofii Hegla zasady antagonizmu jako fundującej nowoczesną polityczność, a także ukazania wojny i motłochu jako ‘granic', ‘ograniczeń'i ‘przeszkód'w rozwoju systemu etyczności i społeczeństwa obywatelskiego (…) zrealizowano w sposób przemyślany, udokumentowany, przekonujący i oryginalny”. [z recenzji Profesor Ewy Nowak] Bartosz Wójcik (ur. 1990), filozof i historyk idei. Adiunkt w Instytucie Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk. W 2022 roku obronił tam doktorat poświęcony wojnie i motłochowi w filozofii Hegla. W latach 2017−2022 realizował w ISP PAN projekt badawczy Filozofia negatywności Hegla i Žižka finansowany ze środków Narodowego Centrum Nauki. Jest redaktorem naczelnym czasopisma naukowego „Praktyka Teoretyczna”. Publikował liczne artykuły i recenzje naukowe, na łamach min. „Civitasu”, „Kronosa”, „Tekstów Drugich”, „Widoku”, „FA-artu” i „Athenaeum”.

This book brings together philosophical approaches to explore the relation of recognition and poverty. This volume examines how critical theories of recognition can be utilized to enhance our understanding, evaluation and critique of poverty and social inequalities. Furthermore, chapters in this book explore anti-poverty policies, development aid and duties towards the (global) poor. This book includes critical examinations of reflections on poverty and related issues in the work of past and present philosophers of recognition. This book hopes to contribute to the ongoing and expanding debate on recognition in ethics, political and social philosophy by focusing on poverty, which is one highly important social and global challenge.“If one believed that the theme of “recognition” had been theoretically exhausted over the last couple of years, this book sets the record straight. The central point of all the studies collected here is that poverty is best understood in its socialcauses, psychic consequences and moral injustice when studied within the framework of recognition theory. Regardless of how recognition is defined in detail, poverty is best captured as the absence of all material and cultural conditions for being recognized as a human being. Whoever is interested in the many facets of poverty is well advised to consult this path-breaking book.” Axel Honneth, Columbia University.

How did science come to have such a central place in Western culture? How did cognitive values—and subsequently moral, political, and social ones—come to be modelled around scientific values? In Civilization and the Culture of Science, Stephen Gaukroger explores how these values were shaped and how they began, in turn, to shape those of society. The core nineteenth- and twentieth-century development is that in which science comes to take centre stage in determining ideas of civilization, displacing Christianity in this role. Christianity had provided a unifying thread in the study of the world, however, and science had to match this, which it did through the project of the unity of the sciences. The standing of science came to rest or fall on this question, which the book sets out to show in detail is essentially ideological, not something that arose from developments within the sciences, which remained pluralistic and modular. A crucial ingredient in this process was a fundamental rethinking of the relations between science and ethics, economics, philosophy, and engineering. In his engaging description of this transition to a scientific modernity, Gaukroger examines five of the issues which underpinned this shift in detail: changes in the understanding of civilization; the push to unify the sciences; the rise of the idea of the limits of scientific understanding; the concepts of'applied'and'popular'science; and the way in which the public was shaped in a scientific image.

In Singularities at the Threshold: The Ontology of Unrest, Bruno Gullì calls into question the concept of the independent and sovereign individual of the liberal (and neoliberal) tradition from the standpoint of the ontology of singularity, that is, the plural constitution of what appears to be an individual. Singularity is not the result of a process of individuation, but the process itself. He argues that the process of individuation—whereby at each stage everything appears to be individuated as such, to be an individual thing—is in reality always already plural, a process of transindividuation, or better, trans-dividuation. Gullì further examines why singularity is usually confused with individuality; what comes after the sovereign and independent individual, after the subject; and what the role of subversive and liberated singularities is in bringing about a new ethos and a better world.

Hegel war einer der ersten Theoretiker, der die soziale Bedeutung der zu Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts entstehenden Marktgesellschaft reflektierte. Er betont dabei die Gefahren dieser Vergesellschaftungsform, aber auch deren emanzipative Potenziale. Letztere entfalten sich für ihn mit Hilfe der Institution der Korporation. In korporativen Vereinigungen verwandelt sich das zweckorientierte Gegeneinander der Marktakteure in wechselseitige Solidarität. Hegel nennt die Korporation daher auch die eigentliche ‚sittliche Wurzel‘ der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Im vorliegenden Band wird Hegels Korporationslehre rekonstruiert und auf ihre Aktualität hin befragt. Dafür werden Anschlüsse aus der Wirtschaftsphilosophie, der Sozialphilosophie sowie der politischen Philosophie diskutiert.

Explores the core of Balibar’s work since 1980This collection explores Balibar’s rethinking of the connections between subjection and subjectivity by tracing the genealogies of these concepts in their discursive history. The 12 essays provide an overview of Balibar’s work after his collaboration with Althusser. They explain and expand his framework; in particular, by restoring Arabic and Islamic thought to the conversation on the citizen subject. The collection includes two previously untranslated essays by Balibar himself on Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes. Key FeaturesThe first English-language edited collection to focus on BalibarPresents and explains Balibar’s key contributions to political theory and the history of political philosophyIncludes two essays by Balibar himself on Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes:'Schmitt’s Hobbes, Hobbes’s Schmitt'and'The Mortal God and his Faithful Subjects: Hobbes, Schmitt and the Antinomies of Secularism'Contributors include Étienne Balibar, Nancy Armstrong, Giorgos Fourtounis, Mohamed Moulfi

The Science of Freedom completes Peter Gay's brilliant reinterpretation begun in The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism. In the present book, he describes the philosophes'program and their views of society. His masterful appraisal opens a new range of insights into the Enlightenment's critical method and its humane and libertarian vision.