Search

Cellular networks are important for the success of modern communication systems, which support billions of mobile users and devices. Powered by artificial intelligence techniques, cellular networks are becoming increasingly smarter, and cellular traffic prediction is an important basis for realizing various applications that have originated from this trend. In this survey, we review the relevant studies on cellular traffic prediction and classify the prediction problems as the temporal and spatiotemporal prediction problems. The prediction models with artificial intelligence are categorized into statistical, machine learning, and deep learning models and then compared. Various applications based on cellular traffic prediction are summarized along with their current progress. The potential research directions are pointed out for future research. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first comprehensive survey on cellular traffic prediction. • Artificial intelligence for cellular traffic prediction is reviewed comprehensively. • Cellular traffic prediction problems, models, and evaluation metrics are classified. • The potential applications and directions for future research are pointed out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Confident itemsets are used to discretize the whole model into subspaces. • Concise instance-wise explanations approximate the behavior of the black-box. • Class-wise explanations approximate the black-box's behavior in different subspaces. • Confident itemsets explanations improve the fidelity by 9.3% over other methods. • Confident itemsets explanations improve the interpretability by 8.8% Black-box Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, e.g. deep neural networks, have been widely utilized to build predictive models that can extract complex relationships in a dataset and make predictions for new unseen data records. However, it is difficult to trust decisions made by such methods since their inner working and decision logic is hidden from the user. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) refers to systems that try to explain how a black-box AI model produces its outcomes. Post-hoc XAI methods approximate the behavior of a black-box by extracting relationships between feature values and the predictions. Perturbation-based and decision set methods are among commonly used post-hoc XAI systems. The former explanators rely on random perturbations of data records to build local or global linear models that explain individual predictions or the whole model. The latter explanators use those feature values that appear more frequently to construct a set of decision rules that produces the same outcomes as the target black-box. However, these two classes of XAI methods have some limitations. Random perturbations do not take into account the distribution of feature values in different subspaces, leading to misleading approximations. Decision sets only pay attention to frequent feature values and miss many important correlations between features and class labels that appear less frequently but accurately represent decision boundaries of the model. In this paper, we address the above challenges by proposing an explanation method named Confident Itemsets Explanation (CIE). We introduce confident itemsets, a set of feature values that are highly correlated to a specific class label. CIE utilizes confident itemsets to discretize the whole decision space of a model to smaller subspaces. Extracting important correlations between the features and the outcomes of the classifier in different subspaces, CIE produces instance-wise and class-wise explanations that accurately approximate the behavior of the target black-box. Conducting a set of experiments on various black-box classifiers, and different tabular and textual data classification tasks, we show that our CIE method performs better than the previous perturbation-based and rule-based explanators in terms of the descriptive accuracy (an improvement of 9.3%) and interpretability (an improvement of 8.8%) of the explanations. Subjective evaluations demonstrate that the users find the explanations of CIE more understandable and interpretable than those of the other comparison methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]