Search

The paper analyzes the application of the numerical findings of the program, which is becoming increasingly difficult for civil and structural design. Since, as in many other countries, the verification of design using a software model is now required by current Italian codes as well. Given this, the structural engineer must provide a technical report using a licensed software tool, attached to other project documents to get the Seismic Authorization at the local Civil Engineering Department offices. Following a brief explanation of structural analysis methodologies, this study presents a criterion for assessing the applicability of numerical findings obtained using any structural software. Three case studies of this criterion are shown to demonstrate how to check them using simple manual calculations: (i) the normal stress in RC columns subjected to gravity loads; (ii) the periods of vibration, participating masses, and seismic base shear derived from dynamic modal analysis; and (iii) the main parameters characterizing the pushover curves of existing buildings. Finally, this work underlines the significance of confirming the application of numerical results obtained by software in civil and structural design. The offered criteria and scenarios exhibit realistic techniques to ensure accuracy and reliability in structural performance assessment, according to the structural requirements imposed by current codes in Italy and similar countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A close relationship between civil protection organizations and scientific community is widely recognized today at international and European level as being of paramount importance for the effectiveness of research products in their application for disaster risk management. In this perspective, European research projects on risks are more and more focused on application oriented outcomes, requiring the involvement of civil protection organizations, and creating a well-structured knowledge network within a European civil protection framework. For about forty years, the Italian civil protection has been relying upon the contribution of the scientific community to find the best solutions based on the most advanced and consolidated knowledge, for activities that concern the management of the entire disaster risk cycle. The interactions between civil protection and scientific community in Italy are mainly based on the so-called Competence Centers, i.e. the scientific operational partners of the Civil Protection Department (DPC), and on the Major Risks Commission, i.e. the technical-scientific advisory body of DPC. They both work with an interdisciplinary, multisectoral and, when necessary, multi-hazard risk approach. This paper aims to describe how Competence Centers presently operate, in a way that has evolved over the years. The focus will be on scientific activities and products related to the earthquake and structural engineering science, emphasizing the way of operating and collaborating of Competence Centers, consistently with the principles of the Italian Civil Protection Code. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]