Search

Background: Adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remain vulnerable to HIV infection. While pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV transmission as a daily or on-demand regimen, tailored approaches are necessary. The Combined HIV Adolescent PrEP and Prevention Study (CHAPS) is a mixed-methods research program investigating the acceptability and feasibility of implementing daily and on-demand PrEP among young people in SSA. It also aims to determine an on-demand dosing schedule for insertive sex. For this paper, we explored preferences for daily versus on-demand PrEP amongst adolescents as part of CHAPS. Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from Soweto and Cape Town (South Africa), Wakiso district (Uganda) and Chitungwiza (Zimbabwe). At the time of the study in 2018/2019, Uganda had not rolled out PrEP to the general population; in Zimbabwe, PrEP for young people was only available at selected sites with one located within the study recruitment area. In South Africa, PrEP was made available to selected high-risk groups. We conducted 60 in-depth interviews and 24 group discussions amongst young people aged 13–24 without HIV in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. All in-depth interviews and group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated to English. Data were analysed using framework analysis. The main themes were centered around preferences for daily and on-demand PrEP. Results: Reasons for on-demand preferences included stigma, pill fatigue, adherence and side effects. Reasons for daily PrEP preferences included factors related to sexual risk behaviour, continuous protection against incidents of unintentional exposure, and the increased efficacy of a daily dose. Participants at all sites preferring daily PrEP identified the same reasons, with more males than females citing inadvertent blood contact or perceived increased efficacy. Similarly, participants at all sites preferring on-demand PrEP gave the same reasons for their preferences for on-demand PrEP; the exception was South Africans who did not mention the hope of having fewer side effects by not taking daily PrEP. Additionally, more males than females cited intermittent sex as a reason for opting for on-demand PrEP. Conclusions: Our study is the first known to explore and describe youth preferences for daily versus on-demand PrEP. While the choice is clear-cut, the reasons cited in the different options provide invaluable insights into their decisions, and the actual and perceived facilitators and barriers to access to PrEP. Further education is needed amongst young people, not only about PrEP but also in other areas of comprehensive sexuality education. Exploring all options of HIV prevention is crucial to provide a tailored, one-size-does-not-fit-all approach to adolescent care in SSA to reduce and, the continued and increasing risk of this preventable infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HIV remains a leading contributor to the disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa, with adolescents and young people disproportionately affected. Optimising pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake has predominantly focused on women and adult men who have sex with men. We explore adolescent boys and young men's PrEP uptake preferences in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Methods: A cross-sectional sequential exploratory mixed-methods study amongst males aged 13–24 years was conducted between April and September 2019 as part of the CHAPS trial. Group discussions (GDs) and In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) focused on motivations and hindrances for HIV testing, PrEP preference, and reasons for the uptake of PrEP. A thematic approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. A quantitative survey following the qualitative work covered questions on demographics, HIV risk and PrEP preferences (on-demand vs. daily). For quantitative analysis, we fitted logistic regression models to determine factors associated with on-demand vs daily PrEP preference. Results: Overall, 647 adolescent boys and young men (median age 20, IQR: 17–22) were enrolled. Of these, 422 (65.22%) preferred on-demand PrEP (South Africa 45.45%, Uganda 76.80%, Zimbabwe 70.35%; p<0.001). Factors independently associated with on-demand PrEP included country (South Africa, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.19 [95%CI:0.1–0.3] compared to Uganda) and advanced planning of sex [>24 hours in advance aOR = 1.4 (0.9–2.3) compared to <2 hours]. Qualitatively, participants commonly believed they were not at risk of HIV acquisition most of the time and thought that on-demand PrEP would be suitable as they tend to plan sexual activity in advance. Conclusion: Preference for on-demand PrEP is high in young males. The qualitative data support a preference for on-demand PrEP in those who plan sex in advance. HIV intervention programs should offer both on-demand and daily PrEP to engage more adolescent boys and young men in HIV prevention practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HIV infection during pregnancy and breastfeeding has implications for maternal health. Between May- November 2018, we explored prospective acceptability of two novel HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) products, oral pills and vaginal rings, through focus group discussions with 65 pregnant and breastfeeding women in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe. Qualitative analysis was completed, guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). First, a deductive thematic analysis was applied to relevant coded data, into the seven TFA constructs (Affective Attitude; Burden; Ethicality, Intervention Coherence; Opportunity Costs; Perceived Effectiveness; Self-efficacy). Next, an iterative analysis was completed to generate themes within each of the TFA constructs. Women's positive attitudes towards daily oral PrEP highlighted the familiarity of taking pills, understanding the purpose of taking pills, and the perception that it is an effective method to protect mothers and babies from HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Women emphasized the ease of using the ring given its monthly duration that lowers burden on the user, its discreetness and invisibility once in place. The TFA analysis highlighted how acceptability of both methods could be enhanced by focusing on perceptions of the end users (i.e. the women) and not just the products themselves. This approach provided insights into how to refine the intervention materials and plans for implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]